Study on Governance Mechanisms and Modes of Ecosystem Services in Bulgarian Farms

  • Hrabrin BACHEV Institute of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria

Abstract




Agricultural ecosystems of different types and their specific “agro-ecosystem” services are among the most widespread in the world. Nevertheless, in Bulgaria, like in many other countries, there are few studies on the specific mechanisms, modes, factors, and efficiency of agro-ecosystem survives governance. This article tries to identify and assess the governance mechanisms and modes of diverse ecosystem services in Bulgarian farms. Firstly, it identifies the type, amount, and importance of various ecosystem services maintained and “produced” by agricultural holdings. The study has found out that country’s farms provide a great number of essential ecosystem services among which provisioning food and feed, and conservation of elements of the natural environment prevail.


Secondly, it identifies and assesses the efficiency and complementarities of specific modes and mechanisms of governance of ecosystem services used by farms. The study has found out that a great variety of private, market, collective, public and hybrid modes of governance of farm activity related to agro-ecosystem services are applied. There is significant differentiation of employed managerial forms depending on the type of ecosystem services and the specialization of holdings. Furthermore, management of agro-ecosystem services is associated with a considerable increase in production and transaction costs of participating farms as well as big socio-economic and environmental effects for holdings and other parties. The factors that mostly stimulate the activity of agricultural producers in Bulgaria for protection of (agro)ecosystems services are participation in public support programs, access to farmers' advice, professional training, available information, and innovation, received direct subsidies from EU and national government, personal conviction and satisfaction, positive experience of others, long-term and immediate benefits for the farm, and integration with suppliers, buyers, and processors.




References

[1] Adhikari, B. and Boag, G. 2013. Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 72–77.
[2] Allen, J., DuVander, J.Y., Kubiszewski, I., Ostrom., E. 2011. Institutions for Managing Ecosystem Services. Solutions. 2(6): 44-49.
[3] Bachev, H. 2009a. Governing of Agro-ecosystem Services. Modes, Efficiency, Perspectives, VDM Verlag.
[4] Bachev, H. 2009b. Mechanisms of Governance of Sustainable Development. Journal of Applied Economic Science, Vol. 4, 2, 169-184.
[5] Bachev, H. 2010. Governance of Agrarian Sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
[6] Bachev, H. 2011. Water governance in Bulgarian agriculture, Climate Change and its Effects on Water Re- sources, Springer, Dordrecht, 215-224.
[7] Bachev, H. 2014. Forms, Factors and Efficiency of Eco-management in Bulgarian Farms. Economic Thought, 5: 86-112.
[8] Bachev, H. and Ito, F. 2014. Implications of Fukushima Nuclear Disaster for Japanese Agri-food Chains. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2(1): 95-120.
[9] Bachev, H. 2014. Environmental management in agriculture, Economic Thought, 1: 56-79.
[10] Bachev, H. 2016. Defining and assessment of sustainability of farms. Economic Studies Journal, 158-188.
[11] Bachev, H. 2020. Defining, analyzing and improving the governance of agroecosystem services. Economic Thought, 4: 31-55.
[12] Bachev, H. 2018. The Sustainability of Farming Enterprises in Bulgaria, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[13] Bachev, H., Ivanov, B. and Sarov, A. 2020. Unpacking Governance Sustainability of Bulgarian Agriculture. Ikonomicheski Izsledvaniya – Economic Studies, 6: 106-137.
[14] Bachev, H. 2021. Modes of Governance for Ecosystem Services in Bulgarian Farms. Economic Studies, 30(8):145-174.
[15] Bachev, H. 2021. Mapping sources, types and importance of ecosystem services from Bulgarian agriculture. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 8(1): 1 - 24.
[16] Boelee, E. (Editor). 2013. Managing water and agroecosystems for food security. CABI.
[17] De Groot, R., Wilson, M., Boumans, R. 2002. A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions goods services. Ecol Econ, 41: 393–408.
[18] Fremier, A., DeClerck, F., Bosque-Pérez, N., Carmona, R., Hill, T., Joyal, L., Keesecker, P., Klos, A., Martínez- Salinas, R., Niemeyer, R., Sanfiorenzo, A., Welsh, K., Wulfhorst. J. 2013. Understanding Spatiotemporal Lags in Ecosystem Services to Improve Incentives. BioScience Volume 63, Issue 6.
[19] Gao, H., Fu, T., Liu, J., Liang, H. and Han. L. 2018. Ecosystem Services Management Based on Differentiation and Regionalization along Vertical Gradient, China. Sustainability, 10, 986.
[20] Garbach, K., Milder, J., Montenegroand, M. DeClerck, F. 2014. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Agroe- cosystems in Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, Volume 2, Chapter 13, DOI:10.1016/B978-0- 444-52512-3.00013-9
[21] Gemmill-Herren, B. 2018. Pollination Services to Agriculture Sustaining and Enhancing a Key Ecosystem Ser- vice, Routledge. ISBN 978-1138904408
[22] Habib T., Heckbert, S., Wilson, J., Vandenbroeck, A., Farr, D.J. 2016. Impacts of land-use management on ecosystem services and biodiversity: An agent-based modelling approach. PeerJ, 4:e2814. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2814
[23] Kanianska R. 2019. Agriculture and Its Impact on Land-Use, Environment, and Ecosystem Services, INTECH. DOI: 10.5772/63719
[24] Laurans, Y. and Mermet, L. 2014. Ecosystem services economic valuation, decision-support system or advo- cacy? Ecosystem Services, 7: 98-105.
[25] Lescourret, F., Magda, D., Richard, G., Adam-Blondon, A., Bardy, M., Baudry, J., Doussan, I., Dumont, B., Lefèvre, F., Litrico, I., Martin-Clouaire, R., Montuelle, B., Pellerin, S., Plantegenest, M., Tancoigne, E., Thomas, A., Guyomard, H., Soussana, J. 2015. A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001
[26] Marta-Pedroso, C., Laporta, L., Gama, I., Domingos, T. 2018. Economic valuation and mapping of Ecosystem Services in the context of protected area management, One Ecosystem, 3: e26722.
[27] Mykhailova, L., Stoyanets, N., Mykhailov, A., Kharchenko, T., Bachev. H. 2018. Sustainable development of the Ukrainian agrarian sector: Perspectives and challenges. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3): 28-39.
[28] Munang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., Liu, J. and Han. Z. 2013. The role of ecosystem services in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 47–52.
[29] Novikova, A., Rocchi, L., Vitunskienė, V. 2017. Assessing the benefit of the agroecosystem services: Lithuanian preferences using a latent class approach. Land Use Policy, 68: 277-286.
[30] Nunes P., Kumar, P., Dedeurwaerdere, T. 2014. Handbook on the Economics of Ecosystem Services and
Biodiversity, Edward Elgar (Ed.), Cheltenham, 608 pp. ISBN: 978 1 78195 150 7
[31] Petteri V., D’Amato, D., Forsius, M., Angelstam, P., Baessler, C., Balvanera, P., Boldgiv, B., Bourgeron, P., Dick, J., Kanka, R., Klotz, S., Maass, M., Melecis, V., Petrık, P., Shibata, H., Tang, J., Thompson, J. and Zacharias, S. 2013. Using long-term ecosystem service and biodiversity data to study the impacts and adap- tation options in response to climate change: insights from the global ILTER sites network. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 53–66.
[32] Power, A. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, Biological Sciences, 365(15554): 2959–2971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
[33] Scholes, R., Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Spierenburg, M. and Duriappah, A. 2013. Multi-scale and cross-scale as- sessments of social – ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 16–25.
[34] Tsiafouli, M., Drakou, E., Orgiazzi, A., Hedlund, K. and Ritz, K. 2017. Optimizing the Delivery of Multiple Eco- system Goods and Services in Agricultural Systems. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Volume 5, art. 9715.
[35] Van Oudenhoven, A. 2020. Quantifying the effects of management on ecosystem services. Available at:
https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Quantifying-the-effects-of-management-on-ecosystem-services.htm
[36] Wang, S., Fu, B., Wei, Y., Lyle, C. 2013. Ecosystem services management: An integrated approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5: 11–15.
[37] Wood, S., Karp, D., DeClerck, F., Kremen, C., Naeem, S., Palm, C. 2015. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1–9.
[38] Zhan, J. (Editor). 2015. Impacts of Land-use Change on Ecosystem Services, Springer Geography. Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48007-6, Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-48008-3
[39] Todorova K. 2017. Adoption of ecosystem-based measures in farmlands – new opportunities for flood risk management. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1): 152-157.
[40] Todorova К. 2017. Upravlenie na riska or navodneniya chres ecosistemni uslugi ot zemedelskite stopanstva, Disertazia, UNSS.
[41] Grigorova Y. and Kazakova Y. 2008. High Nature Value farmlands: Recognizing the importance of South East European landscapes, Case study report, Western Stara Planina, WWF (EFNCP).
[42] Yordanov J., D. Mihalev, V. Vasilev, S. Bratanova- Dončeva, K. Gočeva, N. Čipev. 2017. Metodika za ocenka i kartirane na sʺstojanieto na zemedelskite ekosistemi i tehnite uslugi v Bulgarija, IAOS
[43] Kazakova Ja. 2016. Zemedelie s visoka prirodna stojnost (obučenie, inovacii, znanija), UNSS.
[44] Nedkov S. 2016. KONCEPCIYA za Ekosistemni uslugi, Prezentacija, rabotna sreŝa 31 maj 2016g.
[45] Nikolov S. 2018. Ecosystem Services and their Evaluation. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society, Vol. 39, 51–54.
[46] Chiipev N., Sv. Bratanova - Dončeva, K. Gočeva, M. Žijanski, M. Mondeška, Ja. Jordanov, I. Apostolova, D. Sopotlieva, N. Velev, E. Rafailova, J. Uzunov, V. Karamfilov, Radka Fikova, St. Vergiev. 2017. Metodologična ramka za ocenka i kartirane na sʺstojanieto na ekosistemite i ekosistemnite uslugi v Bʺlgarija rʺkovodstvo za monitoring na sʺstojanieto i razvitieto na ekosistemite i ekosistemnite uslugi, IAOS.
[47] Williamson, O. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
*** EEA. 2015. Ecosystem Services in the EU. European Environment Agency.
*** FAO. 2016. Mainstreaming ecosystem services and biodiversity into agricultural production and management in East Africa. Technical guidance document, FAO.
*** MEA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Island Press, Washington, DC.
*** UN. 2005. The Millennium Development Goals Report. United Nations, New York.
*** WWF. 2019. Екосистемите и техните „услуги”, WWF.
*** EEA-ИАОС. 2020. Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services, Executive Environment Agency of Bulgaria.
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
BACHEV, Hrabrin. Study on Governance Mechanisms and Modes of Ecosystem Services in Bulgarian Farms. Journal of Advanced Research in Management, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 54 - 76, dec. 2021. ISSN 2068-7532. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarm/article/view/6730>. Date accessed: 02 oct. 2022.