Market Power and the Incentive to Innovate: A Return to Schumpeter and Arrow
Abstract
Using a simple linear demand and marginal cost function, we demonstrate that both competition and monopoly have incentives to innovate since this increases their profit levels. However, our results show that perfect competition is more motivated to innovate since the increase in the profit is greater with the same cost reduction and the same innovation. We also conclude that a more drastic innovation brings greater rent to the monopolist and reduces the advantages of perfect competition over monopoly. It could be presumed that monopoly firms would be attracted to more substantive innovations rather than non-drastic ones.
References
[2] Buckley, P.J., and Casson, M.C. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1-349-50843-3
[3] Church, J.R., Ware, R. 2000. Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, ISBN: 978-0071166454. Available at: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/1663633/mod_resource/content/1/ ChurchWare.pdf
[4] Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16): 386-405.
[5] Galbraith, J.K. 1956. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. (Rev. ed.), Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978- 0395077078
[6] Galbraith, J.K. 1967. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 9780691131412
[7] Gilbert, R. 2006. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the Competition-Innovation Debate. In Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6: 159– 215, A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Stern, eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[8] Hennart, J-F. 1980. A Theory of the Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199241821.003.0005
[9] Holmes, T., Levine, D., Schmitz, J. 2012. Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(3): 1-33. DOI: 10.1257/mic.4.3.1
[10] Jewkes, J., Sawers, D., and Stillerman, R. 1969. The Sources of Invention. 2nd Ed., New York: Norton. ISBN: 978-1-349-00015-9
[11] Kang, R.C. 1990. The role of product-specific factors in intra-firm trade of US manufacturing multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2): 319-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490338
[12] Scherer, F.M. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd Ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978- 0395307267
[13] Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, London: Harper and Brothers. ISBN 9780415107624. Available at: https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/Schumpeter,%20 Capitalism,%20Socialism%20and%20Democracy.pdf
[14] Shapiro, C. 2012. Competition and innovation: Did Arrow hit the bull’s eye? Chapter in NBER book The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited, J. Lerner and S. Stern, eds., pp. 361-404, University of Chicago Press, NBER.
[15] Sutton, J. 1998. Technology and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262193993
[16] Sutton, J. 2007. Market structure: Theory and evidence. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3: 2301-2368, M. Armstrong and R. Porter, eds., Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03035-4
[17] Tirole, J. 1997. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2554286
[18] Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises. New York: Basic Books. ISBN: 978- 0582410480
[19] Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting, New York: The Free Press: A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.