The Significance of Decentralisation and of Governance Quality for the Regional Development and the Absorption of the European Funds
Abstract
In Romania the significance of the administrative traditions and of the political management and the slow pace of the reforms from the public sector affected the development potential of some strong institutions. In consequence, 30 years from the fall of the communist system we can explain the weak management of the external aid referring to the socio-political circumstances and the weak institutions offering a significant handicap for Romania in this sense. Despite these, the strong variation among the countries in Central and Eastern Europe is still a problem to be identified referred to the global absorption of the funds from the point of view of the causes. Studying the way in which the administrative capacity can interact with the internal governance and the institutional and regional arrangements became an important field of study in order to understand the performance problems. Assessing the flow of ideas about the institutional and administrative effort for a new region, we pointed out the fact that this is useless if it not accompanied by a decentralization.
Therefore, the regions should not get the attributions of the centre, so that the main purpose of a new organization on regions to be decentralization and not only mapping new entities comprising a vaster territory than the one of the counties. The hypothesis we start from in our research is that the political and the administrative spheres impacts the various stages of the absorption process. Understanding the way in which the specific aspects of absorbing the EU funds might interact with the internal political factors helps us understand the way in which this influences the administrative capacity.
References
[2] Barca, F. 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, report prepared at the request of the EU Commissioner for Regional Policy DanutaHübner, Brussels: European Commission.
[3] Dotti, N.F. 2013. The unbearable instability of structural funds’ distribution. European Planning Studies, 21(4): 596–614.
[4] Filipescu, D. 2017. A forgotten topic: The reform of the administrative organization. Is it worth the effort? Available at: https://www.contributors.ro/
[5] Georgescu, G. 2008. Determinants of increasing EU funds absorption capacity in Romania. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 2(10):1–8.
[6] Knill, C. 1998. European policies: The impact of national administrative traditions. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1): 1-28
[7] Marinov, A. 2011. Problems in defining the administrative capacity concept. Public Policies Bulgaria, 2(1): 15-24.
[8] Milio, S. 2008. How political stability shapes administrative performance: The Italian case. West European Politics, 31(5): 915-936.
[9] Surubaru, N.C. 2016. Administrative and political embeddedness - How to improve the institutional environments dealing with the management and implementation of EU Structural and Investment Funds, Taylor & Francis, 171-186 pp.
[10] Zaman G., Cristea A. 2011. EU Structural funds absorption in Romania: Obstacles and issues. Romanian Journal of Economics, 32: 60-77.
[11] Zaman G., Georgescu G. 2009. Structural fund absorption: A new challenge for Romania? Journal for Economic Forecasting, 6(1): 136-154.
*** Assembly of European Regions, „From Subsidiarity to Success: The Impact of Decentralisation on Economic Growth”, Part I, May 2009. Available at: http://www.aer.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/PressComm/Publications/ AER_Study_on_decentralisation/Studies/BAKPart1-FINAL_cover.pdf
*** National Council of Private Small and Medium Enterprises in Romania, Impact of regionalization on the absorption of European funds in Romania, April 2013.
*** The Government of Romania. Decision no. 229/2017 regarding the approval of the General Decentralization Strategy; Articles 120-123 of the Constitution of Romania; Law no. 215/2001 regarding the Local Public Administration; The Law on Elections no. 35/2008; Law no. 151/1998, Law of regional development in Romania.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.