Study on Corporate Social Responsability Activities regarding Small and Medium-Sisez Entreprises in Romania (2017-2018)

  • Mihnea Răzvan ȘTEFĂNESCU University of Craiova, Romania


This article is meant to be an insight into the acceptance and implementation of CSR by romanian SMEs, witch is generally underestimated and poorly acknowledged, due to the fact that the internal organization of SMEs is largely informal and is mainly carried out under local or regional conditions. Social responsibility can not be seen only as a response to problems that appear during the company's development. Unless the company includes ethical concerns in it’s business strategy, social responsibility as a concept can not be integrated into it’s daily decision-making. That is why business strategy determines how the company uses the human and financial resources at its disposal to achieve its goals, and the value system of companies and stakeholders will have a profound effect on development. Measuring and evaluating CSR will not be an easy task for SMEs that do not have highly developed and reliable internal management, measurement and reporting systems (human resources, time and financial resources) and sophisticated management information systems, as the activity is difficult even for larger companies, which in many cases have these resources. In order to help companies, whether multinationals or SMEs, overcome these obstacles and have a clearer picture of CSR practices, in the paper we are going to present, we will provide not only part of what the questionnaire regarding socially responsible activities performed by the respondent companies in Romania showed, but our conclusions on it, as well.


[1] Bernd Siebenhüner, Marlen Arnold, Klaus Eisenack and Klaus H. Jacob. 2003. Long-Term Governance for Social-Ecological Change, Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group, 312 pp.
[2] Barry, N. 2002. The Stakeholder Concept of Corporate Control is Illogical and Impractical, The Independent Review, Spring 6 (4): 541-554. Available at:
[3] Bonsón, E., Bednárová, M. 2015. CSR reporting practices of Eurozone companies, Revista de Contabilidad, 18 (2): 182-193.
[4] Crişan-Mitra, C., Borza, A. 2015. Approaching CSR in Romania: An Empirical Analysis, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207: 546-552.
[5] Demirbaga, M., Dilshod, G., Makhmadshoev, D., Rymkevich, O. 2017. Varieties of CSR: Institutions and Socially Responsible Behaviour, International Business Review, 26 (6): 1064-1074.
[6] Elmualim, A. 2017. CSR and Sustainability in FM: Evolving Practices and an Integrated Index, Procedia Engineering, 180: 1577-1584.
[7] Gănescu, M.C. 2012. Limitations of principle, Theoretical and Applied Economics, Volume XIX, 11(576). Available at:
[8] Garay, L., Font, X. 2012. Doing good to do well? Corporate social responsibility reasons, practices and impacts in small and medium accommodation enterprises. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31 (2): 329-337.
[9] Gjølberg, M. 2009. Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (1): 10-22.
[10] Harnessa, D., Ranaweera, C., Karjaluoto, H., Jayawardhena, C. 2018. The role of negative and positive forms of power in supporting CSR alignment and commitment between large firms and SMEs, Industrial Marketing Management, in Press. Available online 26 March.
[11] Jucan, C.N. and Jucan M.S. 2010. Dimensions and challenges of social responsibility, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 12(1). Available at: 1220101/23.pdf
[12] Karaosmanoglu, E., Altinigne, N., GamzeIsiksal, D. 2016. CSR motivation and customer extra-role behavior: Moderation of ethical corporate identity, Journal of Business Research, 69 (10): 4161-4167.
[13] Lim, J.S., Greenwood, C.A. 2017. Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): Stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals, Public Relations Review, 43 (4): 768-776.
[14] Mantovani, D., Magalhães de Andrade, L., Negrão, A. 2017. How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 36: 156-163. Available at: _mot ivations_for_CSR_and_consumer-brand_social_distance_influence_consumers_to_adopt_prosocial_ behavior
[15] Michelona, G., Pilonatob, S., and Ricceri, F. 2015. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33: 59–78. DOI
[16] Moravcikova, K., Stefanikova, L., Rypakova, M. 2015. CSR Reporting as an Important Tool of CSR Communication, Procedia Economics and Finance, 26: 332-338.
[17] Öbersedera, M.,Schlegelmilch, B.B., Murphy, P.E. 2013. CSR practices and consumer perceptions, Journal of Business Research, 66 (10): 1839-1851.
[18] Palihawadana, D., Oghazi, P., Liu, Y. 2016. Effects of ethical ideologies and perceptions of CSR on consumer behavior, Journal of Business Research, 69 (11): 4964-4969.
[19] Rasche, A., Morsing, M. and Moon, J. 2017. Corporate social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, ISBN-10: 1107535395, 554 pp.
[20] Șchiopoiu, Burlea, A. 2009. De la Responsabilitatea Socială a Întreprinderii la Responsabilitatea Socială Deschisă, Editura SITECH Craiova, ISBN-10: 606-530-802-2, 198 pp.
[21] Shahnaz I., Dima J. and Ozkan, M.K. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Developing Country Perspective, in Underwood, S., Blundel, R., Lyon, F., Schaefer, A. (ed.) Social and Sustainable Enterprise: Changing the Nature of Business, Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume 2, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 167-192 pp.
[22] Šontaitė-Petkevičienė, M. 2015. CSR Reasons, Practices and Impact to Corporate Reputation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213: 503-508.
[23] Southwell, C. 2004. Engaging SMEs in Community and Social Issues, in Spence, J.L., Habisch, A., Schmidpeter, R., Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, New York, ISBN-10: 140394315X, 96-111 pp.
*** Dinamica și Perspectiva domeniului CSR în România, ediția a V-a - și Valoria 2017. Available at:
*** Tendințe Și Realități CSR in România, ediția 2016 – EY România &, 2016. Available at:
*** Tendințe Și Realități CSR in România, ediția 2015 – EY România &, 2015. Available at:
How to Cite
ȘTEFĂNESCU, Mihnea Răzvan. Study on Corporate Social Responsability Activities regarding Small and Medium-Sisez Entreprises in Romania (2017-2018). Journal of Advanced Research in Management, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 27-36, nov. 2018. ISSN 2068-7532. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 jan. 2019. doi: