Study on Corporate Social Responsability Activities regarding Small and Medium-Sisez Entreprises in Romania (2017-2018)
This article is meant to be an insight into the acceptance and implementation of CSR by romanian SMEs, witch is generally underestimated and poorly acknowledged, due to the fact that the internal organization of SMEs is largely informal and is mainly carried out under local or regional conditions. Social responsibility can not be seen only as a response to problems that appear during the company's development. Unless the company includes ethical concerns in it’s business strategy, social responsibility as a concept can not be integrated into it’s daily decision-making. That is why business strategy determines how the company uses the human and financial resources at its disposal to achieve its goals, and the value system of companies and stakeholders will have a profound effect on development. Measuring and evaluating CSR will not be an easy task for SMEs that do not have highly developed and reliable internal management, measurement and reporting systems (human resources, time and financial resources) and sophisticated management information systems, as the activity is difficult even for larger companies, which in many cases have these resources. In order to help companies, whether multinationals or SMEs, overcome these obstacles and have a clearer picture of CSR practices, in the paper we are going to present, we will provide not only part of what the questionnaire regarding socially responsible activities performed by the respondent companies in Romania showed, but our conclusions on it, as well.
 Barry, N. 2002. The Stakeholder Concept of Corporate Control is Illogical and Impractical, The Independent Review, Spring 6 (4): 541-554. Available at: http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_06_4_barry.pdf
 Bonsón, E., Bednárová, M. 2015. CSR reporting practices of Eurozone companies, Revista de Contabilidad, 18 (2): 182-193.
 Crişan-Mitra, C., Borza, A. 2015. Approaching CSR in Romania: An Empirical Analysis, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207: 546-552.
 Demirbaga, M., Dilshod, G., Makhmadshoev, D., Rymkevich, O. 2017. Varieties of CSR: Institutions and Socially Responsible Behaviour, International Business Review, 26 (6): 1064-1074.
 Elmualim, A. 2017. CSR and Sustainability in FM: Evolving Practices and an Integrated Index, Procedia Engineering, 180: 1577-1584.
 Gănescu, M.C. 2012. Limitations of principle, Theoretical and Applied Economics, Volume XIX, 11(576). Available at: http://www.ectap.ro/editorial/limitations-of-principle-marin-dinu/f92/
 Garay, L., Font, X. 2012. Doing good to do well? Corporate social responsibility reasons, practices and impacts in small and medium accommodation enterprises. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31 (2): 329-337.
 Gjølberg, M. 2009. Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (1): 10-22.
 Harnessa, D., Ranaweera, C., Karjaluoto, H., Jayawardhena, C. 2018. The role of negative and positive forms of power in supporting CSR alignment and commitment between large firms and SMEs, Industrial Marketing Management, in Press. Available online 26 March.
 Jucan, C.N. and Jucan M.S. 2010. Dimensions and challenges of social responsibility, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 12(1). Available at: http://www.oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/ 1220101/23.pdf
 Karaosmanoglu, E., Altinigne, N., GamzeIsiksal, D. 2016. CSR motivation and customer extra-role behavior: Moderation of ethical corporate identity, Journal of Business Research, 69 (10): 4161-4167.
 Lim, J.S., Greenwood, C.A. 2017. Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): Stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals, Public Relations Review, 43 (4): 768-776.
 Mantovani, D., Magalhães de Andrade, L., Negrão, A. 2017. How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Volume 36: 156-163. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316606520_How _mot ivations_for_CSR_and_consumer-brand_social_distance_influence_consumers_to_adopt_prosocial_ behavior
 Michelona, G., Pilonatob, S., and Ricceri, F. 2015. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33: 59–78. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
 Moravcikova, K., Stefanikova, L., Rypakova, M. 2015. CSR Reporting as an Important Tool of CSR Communication, Procedia Economics and Finance, 26: 332-338.
 Öbersedera, M.,Schlegelmilch, B.B., Murphy, P.E. 2013. CSR practices and consumer perceptions, Journal of Business Research, 66 (10): 1839-1851.
 Palihawadana, D., Oghazi, P., Liu, Y. 2016. Effects of ethical ideologies and perceptions of CSR on consumer behavior, Journal of Business Research, 69 (11): 4964-4969.
 Rasche, A., Morsing, M. and Moon, J. 2017. Corporate social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, ISBN-10: 1107535395, 554 pp.
 Șchiopoiu, Burlea, A. 2009. De la Responsabilitatea Socială a Întreprinderii la Responsabilitatea Socială Deschisă, Editura SITECH Craiova, ISBN-10: 606-530-802-2, 198 pp.
 Shahnaz I., Dima J. and Ozkan, M.K. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Developing Country Perspective, in Underwood, S., Blundel, R., Lyon, F., Schaefer, A. (ed.) Social and Sustainable Enterprise: Changing the Nature of Business, Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume 2, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 167-192 pp.
 Šontaitė-Petkevičienė, M. 2015. CSR Reasons, Practices and Impact to Corporate Reputation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213: 503-508.
 Southwell, C. 2004. Engaging SMEs in Community and Social Issues, in Spence, J.L., Habisch, A., Schmidpeter, R., Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, New York, ISBN-10: 140394315X, 96-111 pp.
*** Dinamica și Perspectiva domeniului CSR în România, ediția a V-a - CSRmedia.ro și Valoria 2017. Available at: https://www.csrmedia.ro/studii-csr/
*** Tendințe Și Realități CSR in România, ediția 2016 – EY România & CSRmedia.ro, 2016. Available at: https://www.csrmedia.ro/studii-csr/
*** Tendințe Și Realități CSR in România, ediția 2015 – EY România & CSRmedia.ro, 2015. Available at: https://www.csrmedia.ro/studii-csr/
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.