The Mechanism behind Product Differentiation: An Economic Model
Abstract
The strategy of product differentiation has been viewed as very important in the field of business administration, but it has not necessarily been viewed as an important source of large differences in firms’ profits in the field of economics. In this paper, this apparent contradiction is examined based on the concepts of “ranking preference and value.ʼ In the proposed model, if a product’s implicit rank is higher, households will purchase the product far more often than competing products even if their qualities are almost identical and the tastes of households are uniformly distributed. Even a slight difference in quality can result in a clear difference in implicit ranks and consequently large differences in firms’ profits. Therefore, the effects of differentiation are amplified by ranking preference, and product differentiation efforts are truly very important for firms.
References
[2] Adler, M. 2006. Stardom and Talent, in Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Volume 1, Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby (ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam. DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01025-8
[3] Baines, A., and Langfield-Smith K. 2003. Antecedents to Management Accounting Change: A Structural Equation Approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28: 675-698. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00102-2
[4] Bayly, K.L., Evans, C.S., and Taylor, A.J. 2006. Measuring Social Structure: a Comparison of Eight Dominance Indices, Behavioural Processes, 73(1): 1-12.DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.011
[5] Borghans, L., and Groot, L. 1998. Superstardom and Monopolistic Power: Why Media Stars Earn More Than Their Marginal Contribution to Welfare, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154(3): 546–571.
[6] Cannon, W.B. 1915. Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage, An Account of Recent Researches into the Function of Emotional Excitement, D. Appleton and Co., New York and London.
[7] De Meyer, A., Jinichiro Nakane, Miller, J.G., and Ferdows, K. 1989. Flexibility: the Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey, Strategic Management Journal, 10(2): 135-144.
[8] Fischer, N. 2002. Competitive Sport's Imitation of War: Imaging the Completeness of Virtue, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 29 (1): 16-37. DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2002.9714620
[9] Frank, R.H. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press, New York.
[10] Frank, R.H. 1991. Positional Externalities, in Strategy and Choice, Zeckhauser, R.J. (Ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[11] Frank, R.H., and Cook, P.J. 1995.The Winner-Take-All Society, The Free Press, New York.
[12] Gabszewicz, J., and Thisse, J. 1979. Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities, Journal of Economic Theory, 20(3): 340-359.
[13] [Gabszewicz, J., and Thisse, J. 1980. Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry, Journal of Economic Theory, 22(2): 327-338.
[14] Harashima. 2016. Ranking Value and Preference: A Model of Superstardom, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 74626.
[15] Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in competition, Economic Journal, 39: 41-57.
[16] James, William. 1910. The Moral Equivalent of War, in Writings: 1902– 1910, Bruce Kuklick (ed.), 1987, Library of America, New York.
[17] Kotha, Suresh, and Orne, D. 1989. Generic Manufacturing Strategies: A Conceptual Synthesis, Strategic Management Journal, 10: 211-231. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100303
[18] Kotha, Suresh, and Bhatt, L. Vadlamani. 1995. Assessing Generic Strategies: An Empirical Investigation of Two Competing Typologies in Discrete Manufacturing Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 16: 75-83.
[19] Landau, H.G. 1951. On Dominance Relations and the Structure of Animal Societies: I. Effect of Inherent Characteristics, The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13 (1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/BF02478336
[20] Lillis, A.M. 2002. Managing Multiple Dimensions of Manufacturing Performance - An Exploratory Study, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 497-529. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00032-0
[21] Miller, D. 1988. Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications, Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 280-308.
[22] Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
[23] Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.
[24] Rosen, S. 1981. The Economics of Superstars, American Economic Review, 71: 845–858.
[25] Salop, S.C. 1979. Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods, Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 141-156. DOI: 10.2307/3003323
[26] Santayana, G. 1972. Philosophy on the Bleachers, in Sport and the Body, Ellen Gerber (ed.), Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.
[27] Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, J. 1982. Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 3-14. DOI: 10.2307/2297136
[28] Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, J. 1983. Natural Oligopolies, Econometrica, 51: 1469-1483. DOI: 0012-9682(198309)51:5<1469:NO>2.0.CO;2-3
[29] Solnick, S.J., and Hemenway, D. 1998. Is More Always Better? A Survey on Positional Concerns, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37: 373 – 383. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00089-4
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.