Interdependence of Political and Media Process in Russia: Current Problem State

  • Natalya Rinatovna BALYNSKAYA Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Russia

Abstract

This article examines the role of information in the political process. Patterns and interrelationships of these processes are analyzed, and the necessity of correct and timely information support of political events is revealed and grounded. It was found on the basis of the study that the information should be considered as a necessary condition underlying any political event. This implies that the political and media processes in Russia are closely interconnected. The author also raises the question of the subjects of political interactions, since the traditional Russian political science does not recognize an individuality as an independent subject: it is concluded that the subjects taking part in politics, as a rule, are a group (this presentation includes a political party), while an individual as an individuality is considered in political science only as a political leader. The author of the article concludes that this state of affairs in the mass-media era is changing, since an individual possessing information resource may also play an important role in politics. This is especially evident at the level of municipal government, where recognition of individuals is large, compared to the federal level. 

References

References
[1] Balynskaya, N.R. 2009. Specifics of participation of the media in political process of modern Russia: a monograph (pp.183). Yekaterinburg: Ural Academy of State Service.
[2] Balynskaya, N.R. 2014. Role of the media in creating the image of the territory: municipal level of administration (on the example of Magnitogorsk). Economics and Politics 1(2): 14 – 16.
[3] Balynskaya, N.R. and Kovaleva, M.M. 2014. Specifics of creating an image of authorities in the media in the context of information and technology progress (on the example of Chelyabinsk region). Governance Matters, 6(12).
[4] Birkland, T. 2005. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making (pp. 297). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
[5] Dimitriadi, D.N. 2004. Political advertising as a means of resolving contradictions reconciled in society. Sotsis, 3.
[6] Efron, E. 2014. Tendentious editorial policy. New York.
[7] Hartley, J. 2002. Understanding News. New York: Methuen; Lnd.
[8] Kalmykov, A.A. 2011. Differentiation of spaces of social cohesiveness // Metadiscourses of social communication and problems of social dialogue (pp. 30). Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the Polytechnic University.
[9] Kirichek, P.N. 2007. Media in the ‘state-society’ system (pp. 13). Moscow: RAGS.
[10] Kovalenko, V.I. 2009. Parliamentarism and direct democracy: contradictions and relationships. Democracy in the modern world: Collection of articles (Plyays, Ya.A., & Shatilov, A.B., Eds., pp. 49). Moscow.
[11] Kravtsov, V.V. 2005. Communication in the political field. Accents 2, 21.
[12] MacLuhan, M. 2006. Understanding Media: The Extention of Man (pp. 243). New York: Graw Hill.
[13] Naumenko, T.V. 2003. Mass communications in the political structure of the society. Bulletin of the Moscow University, Ser. 12, Political science, 3: 102-114.
[14] Nikovskaya, L.I. 2010. From the model of elite conflict to the model of interest groups conflict? Democracy. Authorities. Elites. Collection of articles (Plyays, Ya.A., Ed., pp. 77). Moscow.
[15] Panarin, I.N. 2006. Information war and geopolitics (pp. 163). Moscow: Generation.
[16] Parenti, M. 2008. Democracy for the few (pp. 24). Moscow.
[17] Siebert, F.S., Schramm, W. and Peterson, T. 1998. Four theories of the press (pp. 224). Moscow: National Institute Press, Publishing house ‘Vagrius’.
[18] Tsuladze, A.M. 2007. Political manipulation, or the Conquest of the crowd (pp. 145). Moscow.
[19] William, R. 2004. Media Math: Basic Techniques of Media Evolution (pp. 179). Chicago, Illinois: NTC Publishing Group.
[20] Yale, D.R. 2011. The publicity Handbook: how to maximise publicity for products, services and Organiszations (pp. 360). Chicago: NTC.
Published
2017-04-01
How to Cite
BALYNSKAYA, Natalya Rinatovna. Interdependence of Political and Media Process in Russia: Current Problem State. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 504-510, apr. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/918>. Date accessed: 22 apr. 2024.