PROHIBITION OF PARALLEL IMPORTS AS A HARD CORE RESTRICTION OF ARTICLE 4 OF BLOCK EXCEPTION REGULATION FOR VERTICAL AGREEMENTS: EUROPEAN LAW AND ECONOMICS
Abstract
This paper attempts to highlight the main principles of Competition Law (regulatory and case law framework) covering the prohibition of parallel imports and to reveal the main effects of it on the competitive structure of the market. Especially, the regulatory framework relates Block Exception Regulation 330/2010 with Block Exception Regulation 461/2010 in order to determine whether prohibition of parallel imports constitutes a hardcore restriction or not, while the economic analysis evaluates it in a vertical market with few suppliers & buyers which sell goods to the final (domestic) consumers. The results indicate that the prohibition of parallel imports by upstream sellers cause vertical restraints to the domestic customers of the buyers. In any case, this paper focusing mainly on consumer welfare, does not necessarily link parallel imports with the notion of parallel trade and/or parallel exports as well as it does not provide the pros and cons of parallel trade.
References
[2] Case T–450/05, Peugeot/Commission. 2009. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriSer v/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005TJ0450:EN:HTML.
[3] Case C–551/03 P, General Motors. 2006. ECR I–3173. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62003J0551:EN:HTML.
[4] Case C–338/00 P, Volkswagen/Commission. 2003. ECR I–9189. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu /LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62000J0338:EN:HTML.
[5] Case No IV/M.1612, WAL–MART/ASDA. 1999. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/¬competition/-mergers/cases/decisions/m1612_en.pdf.
[6] Cases 25 and 26/84 Ford–Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc. v Commission. 1985. ECR 2725, Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬CELEX:¬61984J0025¬:EN:HTML.
[7] Case 319/82 Société de vente de ciments et bétons de l’Est. 1983. ECR 4173. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬CELEX:61982J0319:¬EN:¬HTML¬.
[8] Cases 96–102, 104, 105, 108 and 110/82, NV IAZ International Belgium and others v Commission of the European Communities. 1983. ECR 3369, [1984] 3 CMLR 276. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:¬61982¬J0096¬:¬EN:¬HTML.
[9] Case 120/78. 1979. ECR., 649 Cassis de Dijon. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/-LexUriServ.¬do¬?uri=CELEX:61978CJ0120:EN:HTML.
[10] Case 8/74. 1974. ECR, 837 Dassonville. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/¬Lex¬UriServ-/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61974J0008:EN:NOT.
[11] Clark, J., Simon, S. 2010. The New Legal Framework for Motor Vehicle Distribution: A Toolkit to Deal with Real Competition Breakdowns. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 1–13.
[12] COM. 2009. 388, COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION, The Future Competition Law Framework applicable to the motor vehicle sector, {SEC(2009) 1052}, {SEC(2009) 1053}, Brussels, 22.7.2009. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0388:FIN:EN:PDF.
[13] Commission Decision 2006/431/EC of 5 October 2005 in Cases F–2/36.623/36.820/37.275 — SEP et autres/Peugeot SA. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs /36820/36820_191_1.pdf.
[14] Commission Decision 2002/758/EC of 10 October 2001 in Case COMP/36.264 — Mercedes–Benz. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬OJ:¬L:2002:257:0001:0047:EN:PDF.
[15] Commission Decision 2001/146/EC of 20 September 2000 in Case COMP/36.653 — Opel. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:¬059:¬¬0001¬¬:0042:EN:PDF.
[16] Commission Decision 98/273/EC of 28 January 1998 in Case IV/35.733 — VW. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:1998:124:¬0060:0108¬:en:PDF.
[17] Dethmers, F., and Pier Posthuma de Boer, P. 2009. Ten years on: Vertical Agreements under article 81. European Competition Law Review, 30(9), 424–439.
[18] Fotis, P., Polemis, M. 2011. The use of Economic Tools in Merger Analysis: Lessons from US & EU experience. European Competition Journal, 7(2), 323–347.
[19] Fotis, P., Polemis, M., Zevgolis, N. 2011. Robust Event Studies from Derogation from Suspension of Concentrations in Greece during the Period 1995 – 2008. Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, 11, 67–89.
[20] Fotis, P., Polemis, M., Zevgolis, N. 2009. Stock price performance as an argument for derogation from suspension of concentrations: Reality or a myth? European Competition Law Review, 30(5), 216–222.
[21] Goyder, D.G. 2004. EC Competition Law. Oxford University Press, 4th ed.
[22] Karydis, G., Zevgolis, N. 2009. Regulation 1400/2002 and access to technical information: Necessity of convergent interpretation with the principles established by the relevant case law. European Competition Law Review, 30(2), 95–101.
[23] Korah, V., O’Sullivan, D. 2002. Distribution Agreements under the EC Competition Rules. Hart Publishing.
[24] Motta, M. 2009. Competition Policy Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
[25] Overvest, M.B. 2010. A note on collusion and resale price maintenance. European Journal of Law and Competition, doi: 10.1007/s1065701091480.
[26] O.J. L 123C/52, 28.05.2010, COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 461/2010, of 27 May 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬OJ:L:2010:129:0052:0057¬:EN:¬PDF.
[27] O.J. C130/01, 19.05.2010, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Guidelines on Vertical Restraints. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:¬2010:¬130¬:0001:0046:EN:PDF.
[28] O.J. L102/1, 23.4.2010, COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 330/2010, of 20 April 2010, on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:102:0001:¬0007:EN:¬PDF.
[29] OJ L168/05, 21.06.2006. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 907/2006 of 20 June 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on detergents, in order to adapt Annexes III and VII thereto. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:168:0005:0010:en:PDF.
[30] OJ L104/01, 08.04.2004. REGULATION (EC) No 648/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 31 March 2004 on detergents. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:104:0001:0035:en:PDF.
[31] O.J. L 203/30, 1.8.2002, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1400/2002, of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:2002:203:0030:0041:en:PDF.
[32] O.J. L336/21, 29.12.1999, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2790/1999, of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices. Available at http://eur–lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/¬LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:1999:336:0021:0025:en:PDF.
[33] OJ L 200/1, 30.07.1999. Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/¬LexUriServ¬/¬LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:¬31999L0045:en:¬NOT.
[34] OJ 196/1, 16.08.1967. Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬CELEX:¬-31967L0548:en:NOT.
[35] Simon, S. 2010. Die neue Kfz–GVO 461/2010, ÖZK (Österreichische Zeitschrift Fur Kartellrecht). Austrian Competition Journal, 3, 83–91.
[36] Tirole, J. 1998. The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
[37] Vezzoso, S. 2004. On the Antitrust Remedies to Promote Retail Innovation in the EU Car Sector. European Competition Law Review, 25(4), 190–204.
[38] Zevgolis, N., Fotis, P. 2009. Prohibition of parallel imports and application of Regulation on vertical agreements in the sector of detergents for domestic use. Business and Company Law, 11, 1184–1190 (in Greek).
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.