CHURCHES AND PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AS FACILITATOR OF MONEY LAUNDERING: THE CASE OF NIGERIA
Abstract
There is worldwide concern over the ways in which criminally acquired assets are being concealed, transferred and preserved. Many countries including Nigeria have enacted laws against money laundering; drugs trafficking; and, corruption. The study investigates the association of money laundering through the private schools and churches; and, four independent variables namely: Laws and Regulations, enforcement efficiency, banking compliance and corruption. The multiple regression models of Aldrich (2005), and Fisher (1922) are employed to investigate the association of the variables. The study hypothesize that money laundering in Nigeria is enhanced by the proliferation of churches and private educational institutions by which finances are largely unchecked by the authorities to such degree that defective banking regulations; lack of government control of the funds of private schools and faith groups; inadequate enforceability of anti–money laundering laws; and, corruption are the propelling factors. The study suggests that private schools and churches in Nigeria are facilitating money laundering, corruption and organised crimes. It finds that there are serious loopholes in Nigeria’s money laundering laws which enable criminal assets to be preserved and protected under the auspices of schools and church assets. The study concludes that there is urgent need for the overhaul of the national criminal laws and the regulation of the assets of private schools and churches in such ways that can deprive the criminal concealment of illegally acquired assets.
References
[2] Aldrich, J. 2005. Fisher and Regression. Statistical Science 20 (4): 401–417.
[3] Argentiero, A., Bagella, M., and Busato, F. 2008.Money Laundering in a Two Sector Model: Using Theory for Measurement. CEIS Tor Vergata Research Papers Series, Vol. 6, Issue 8, No. 128.
[4] Cook, K.J., and Powell, C. 2003.Christianity and punitive mentalities: A qualitative Study.Crime, Law & Social Change 39: 69–89
[5] Durbin, J., and Watson, G.S. 1951. Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression, II. Biometrika 38: 159–179
[6] Buscaglia, E., and van Dijk, J. 2003. Controlling Organized Crime and Corruption in the Public Sector. Forum on Crime and Society, Vol. 3, Nos. 1 and 2, December.
[7] Buscaglia, E. 2008. The Paradox of Expected Punishment: Legal and Economic Factors Determining Success and Failure in the Fight against Organized Crime. Review of Law & Economics Vol. 4 Issue 1
[8] Fisher, R.A. 1922.The goodness of fit of regression formulae, and the distribution of regression coefficient. J. Royal Statist, Soc. (Blackwell Publishing) 85 (4): 597–612.
[9] Guiora, A.N., and Field, B.J. 2007. Using and Abusing the Financial Markets: Money Laundering as the Achilles’ Hell of Terrorism, U. Pa. Journal of International Law, Vol. 29:1
[10] Hills, R.M. 2001.The Constitutional Rights of Private Government.University of Michigan Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 003. Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 01–002
[11] IMF. 2002. Caribbean Offshore Financial Centres: Past, Present, and Possibilities for the Future. prepared by Suss, Esther C./Williams, Oral H./ Mendis, Chandima, IWF Working Paper, Washington D.C. May 2002.
[12] IMF. 2005. The IMF and the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, online at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/aml.htm
[13] Lee, M.R. 2006. The Religious Institutional Base and Violent crime in Rural Areas. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45(3): 309–24.
[14] Masciandaro, D. 2000. The Illegal Sector, Money Laundering and Legal Economy: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Journal of Financial Crime, November (2): 103–112.
[15] Ogunleye, R.W. 2001. Sensitivity of Bank Stock Returns to Market and Interest Rate Risks: An Empirical Investigation. NDIC Quarterly, Vol. 11 (1 / 2): 57–77.
[16] Ogunleye, G.A. 1999. AA Review of Banking Activities and its Regulatory Framework inNigeria: The Past, Present and Future. NDIC Quarterly, Vol. 9 No. 4.
[17] Pettersson, T. 1991. Religion and Criminality: Structural Relationships between Church Involvement and Crime Rates in Contemporary Sweden. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion pp. 279–91.
[18] Schneider, F. 2008. Money Laundering and Financial Means of organized Crime: Some Preliminary Empirical Findings, Unversita Commerciale, Luigi Bocconi, Paolo Baffi Centre on Central Banking and Financial Regulation, Centre Research Paper Series No. 2008–16.
[19] Stack, S., and Kposowak, A. 2006. The Effect of Religiosity on Tax Fraud Acceptability: A Cross–National Analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45(3):325–51.
[20] UNODC Action against Corruption and Economic Crime, United Nations Convention against Corruption online at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/index.html
[21] Walker, J. 2007. Measuring Global Money Laundering. Paper presented at the conference ‘Tackling Money Laundering’, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, November.
[22] Walker, J. 1994. Estimates of the extent of money laundering in and through Australia, Paper prepared for the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysts Center, September 1994.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.