Justice in Judicial and Non-Judicial Practice in the Administration of the Russian Labor Law: Problems and Prospects

  • Victoria V. VOLKOVA North Caucasian branch of the Federal State Budget Institution of Higher Education ‘Russian State University of Justice’, Krasnodar, Russia
  • Apollinariya A. SAPFIROVA Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education’ the Kuban State Agrarian University named IT Trubilin’, Krasnodar, Russia
  • Anna V. PETRUSHKINA North Caucasian branch of the Federal State Budget Institution of Higher Education ‘Russian State University of Justice’, Krasnodar, Russia

Abstract

Justice is an important component of a regulatory act. Unfortunately, issues related to legal justice and its duality in developing countries, such as Russia, are understudied. Therefore, this research investigates the regulations of the labor law from the perspective of justice and the practice of their administration. The research also analyzes the legislation of the Russian Federation and court rulings related to labor disputes. The conclusion is that the law can be unjust, but that does not mean that it loses its legal force; hence, justice cannot affect the subject of administration of law with a view to preferring justice to law in case of discrepancies between these two concepts. Theoretical recommendations are given regarding the reformation of the legal framework of the Russian Federation, which will reduce the number of lawsuits related to labor disputes.

References

[1] Abdikerimova, A.A. 2016. Contemporary Development Trends in Administrative-Legal Relations in the System of Administrative Justice. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11): 4782-4789.
[2] Alekseyev, S.S. 1999. Law: fundamentals – theory – philosophy: comprehensive research experience. Moscow: Statut, 336-337.
[3] Amangeldy, Sh.K. et al. 2016. Constitutional Law Fundamentals of the State Administration of the Social Sphere in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12): 5237-5249.
[4] Arkhipov, V.V. and Brilliantova, N.A. 2012. Freedom of employment and employment contract: short multifaceted analysis of labor legislation and the practice of its enforcement. GARANT system special. 96.
[5] Averin, A.V. 2007. The truth and legal judicial credibility (Problem statement). Saint Petersburg: Press Juridical Center, 35.
[6] Barnett, R.E. 2014. The structure of liberty: Justice and the rule of law. Oxford: CPI Group (UK) Ltd, 329.
[7] Baytin, M.I. 2001. The essence of law. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law, 99.
[8] Bergel, J.L. 2000. General theory of law. Moscow: NOTA BENE, 575.
[9] Bonner, A.T. 1992. Legitimacy and justice in law enforcement. Moscow: Russian Law, 35.
[10] Bugrov, L.Y. 1991. The principles of ‘non-law’ in the jurisdiction of soviet labor legislation. Soviet State and Law, 12: 54-60.
[11] Hayek, F.A. 2012. Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. London: Routledge, 245.
[12] Ilyin, I.A. 2008. The theory of law and state. Moscow: Zertsalo, 550.
[13] Kudryavtsev, Y. 1988. On the paths of legal reform: Contemplation of reader correspondence. Communist, 14: 78.
[14] Larsson, S. 2014. Justice ‘Under’ Law: The Bodily Incarnation of Legal Conceptions over Time. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 27(4): 613-626.
[15] Livshits, R.Z. 1989. Law in a socialist legal state. Soviet State and Law 3: 16.
[16] Livshits, R.Z. 1994. Theory of law: textbook. Moscow: BECK, 219.
[17] Lloyd, D. 1976. The idea of law. Moscow: Knigodel, 462.
[18] Lloyd, D. 1979. Introduction to jurisprudence. Moscow: Knigodel, 376.
[19] Marchenko, M.N. 1997. The theory of state and law: lecture course. Moscow: Zertsalo, 294.
[20] Morozova, L.A. 2005. The theory of state and law. Moscow: Yurist, 384.
[21] Mozolin, V.P. 2007. On further paths of development of civil law. Journal of Russian Law, 3(123): 15-25.
[22] Muromtsev, S.A. 2004. Definition and basic division of law. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publishing House, 224.
[23] Orlovsky, Y.P. 2012. Relevant problems of labor legislation under economic modernization: monograph. Moscow: Yustitsinform, 239.
[24] Rabin, A. 2012. Law and justice: A handbook of Anglo-Saxon studies. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 334.
[25] Rabtsevich, O.I. 2005. The right to a fair trial: international and national legal regulation. Moscow: Lex Kniga, 221.
[26] Tal, L.S. 1989. Essays of industrial labor law. Moscow: BECK, 233.
[27] Vostresova, O.A. 2006. Conventions and recommendations of the International Labor Organization as sources of labor law. PhD Abstract. Moscow: BECK, 20.
[28] Yegorova, O.A., and Bespalov, Y.F. 2013. Judge reference book for employment cases. Moscow: Prospekt, 156-157.
*** A combination of flexibility on the one hand and regimentation on the other hand constitute the specificity of labor law: Interview with A.V. Malyshkin, Chairman of the Vladimir Oblast Court. 2014. Judge 9: 13-16.
*** Appeal resolution of the Vladimir Oblast court dated 11.11.2014 on case No. 33-3781/2014 // ‘Consultant Plus’ Legal Reference System. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=SOJ;n=1053223; dst=0;ts=0839C0F9F6B2D3419E14E03F886EBF07;rnd=0.7981333450879902
*** Appellate ruling. 2013. Case No. 33-10825. Available at: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sverdlovskij-oblastnoj-sud-sverdlovskaya-oblast-s/act-107331963/
*** Archive of the Krasnodar Krai State Labor Inspection. 2013. Krasnodar. 364.
*** Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation ruling dated September 24, 1992 No.8-P ‘On the interpretation of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation ruling dated February 4, 1992 on the case ‘On the verification of the constitutionality of the law enforcement practice of employment contract termination on grounds. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=cilj
*** Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation ruling. 2001. ‘On the case of verification of the constitutionality of Paragraph 2 Article 1070 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation due to complaints. Available at: http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/010427r1.html
*** Federal Law ‘On Special Assessment of Working Conditions’ No. 426-ФЗ dated December 28, 2013, amended and supplemented. 2014. Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation, 52 (part 1): Article 6991; 26 (part I): Article 3366.
*** Labor Code of the Russian Federation. 2016. Available at: http://kzotrf.ru/
*** Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 16.11.2006 No. 52, amended and supplemented, ‘On the court enforcement of the legislation that regulates the employees’ liability for damages, inflicted to the employer’. 2007. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 1: 34-67.
*** Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated October 10, 2003 No. 5 ‘On the application by courts of general jurisdiction of generally accepted principles and regulations of international law and international agreements of the Russian Federation’, amended and supplemented. 2003. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 12: 23-54.
*** Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated December 11, 2012 No. 10237/04. 2013. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation 3: 12-24.
*** Resolution of the Primosrky Krai court Dated 21.04.2012 on case No. 33-3417. ‘Consultant Plus’ Legal Reference System. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=card;page=splus; ts=83AA7CA620B926DAD7C6805580A7B2FA
*** Supreme Court of the Russian Federation ruling dated May 24, 2002 No.02-375. 2002. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 4: 11-25.
Published
2017-03-06
How to Cite
VOLKOVA, Victoria V.; SAPFIROVA, Apollinariya A.; PETRUSHKINA, Anna V.. Justice in Judicial and Non-Judicial Practice in the Administration of the Russian Labor Law: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 7, p. 1891-1898, mar. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/783>. Date accessed: 03 may 2024.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 7 No 7 (2016): JARLE Volume 7, Issue 7(21), Winter 2016
Section
Articles

The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.