The Category of ‘Unfairness’ in the Contract System Legislation in Russia and the USA: Some Interpretation Issues

  • Dinara Anvarovna MUSABIROVA Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
  • Radik Nakimovich HAMITOV Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation

Abstract

This article presents and defines the concept and the criteria for the content of the ‘unfairness’ category as a special evaluation concept, widely used in the legislation to satisfy the public needs in the Russian Federation and other countries, particularly in the USA. The clarification of its nature is of great importance for the application of this legal category in the law-making and law enforcement activities, first of all, to maximize the effectiveness of the legal regulations and compliance with the principle of fair competition in the negotiation and execution of contracts to meet the public needs. The features of the definition of ‘the register of unfair suppliers’ category and a similar institution in the contract system rules of the USA (the ‘unfair trade practices’) were defined. The theoretical studies of the scientists in this field, as well as the recent case law of Russia, are presented and analyzed. It is proposed to reform the Federal Law of the Russian Federation on the contract system.

References

[1] Andre, S. 2011. The Impact of Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure: Lights, Guash, Haven. World Bank.
[2] Bogdanova, E.E. 2014. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v dogovornykh otnosheniyakh v Rossiyskom i zarubezhnom prave [The Principle of Fairness in Contractual Relations in Russian and Foreign Law]. Actual problems of Russian law, 7: 1363-1369.
[3] Chistyakov, E.A. 2012. Federal'naya kontraktnaya sistema: mezhdunarodnyy opyt [Federal Contract System: International Experience]. Science and Society, 6: 50. Drabkin, D.A. and Thai, K.V. 2007. US Federal Government Procurement: Structure, Process and Current Issues. In Public Procurement: International Cases and Commentary. New York: Routledge.
[4] Gadzhiyev, G.A. 2002. Konstitutsionnye printsipy dobrosovestnosti i nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya sub’ektivnymi pravami [Constitutional Principles of Fairness and the Impossibility to Abuse the Subjective Rights]. State and Law, 7: 25-36.
[5] Gordon, D.I. 2012. Reflections on the Federal Procurement Landscape. Government Contractor, 54(7): 51.
[6] Kashanina, T.V. 1974. Rol' otsenochnykh ponyatiy v pravovom regulirovanii primeneniya sovetskogo prava [The Role of Evaluative Concepts in the Legal Regulation of the Application of the Soviet Law]. In Sbornik uchenykh trudov Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta [Collection of Scientific Papers of the Sverdlovsk Law Institute] (Issue 30). Sverdlovsk: Publishing house Sverdlov. jurid. Inst, pp. 122-127.
[7] Kosarev, K.V. 2013. Nekotorye problemy Federal'nogo zakona ‘O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd’ [Some Problems of the Federal Law ‘On Contract System in the Procurement of Goods, Works and Services for State and Municipal Needs’]. Law and Economics, 7: 6-8.
[8] Koval', A.V. 2010. K voprosu o pravovom regulirovanii razmeshcheniya zakazov na postavku tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd [On the Issue of Legal Regulation of Order Placement for Goods, Works and Services for State and Municipal Needs]. Bulletin of the Arbitration Court of Moscow, 2: 25-28.
[9] Muntyan, L.B., and Romanova, N.V. 2012. O praktike rassmotreniya FAS SZO del, svyazannykh s primeneniem Federal'nogo zakona ot 21.07.2005 No. 94-FZ ‘O razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd’, s uchastiem antimonopol'nykh organov (za period s 2008 goda po oktyabr' 2011 goda) [On the Practice of the FAS NWD Cases Related to the Application of the Federal Law dated 21.07.2005 No. 94-FZ ‘On Order Placement for Goods, Works and Services for State and Municipal Needs’, with the Participation of the Antimonopoly Authorities (for the Period from 2008 to October 2011)]. Arbitration disputes, 2: 18-22.
[10] Pilipenko, A.A. 2012. Kategoriya ‘dobrosovestnost'‘ v nalogovo-pravovoy sfere: nauchnye i prikladnye podkhody [The Category of ‘Fairness’ in the Tax and Legal Sphere: Scientific and Applied Approaches]. Financial Law, 5: 26-29.
[11] Robinson, K.D.C. 2009. U.S. Federal Government Procurement: Organizational Structure, Process, and Current Issues. In K.V. Thai (Ed.), International Handbook of Public Procurement. New York: CRC Press, pp. 291-306.
[12] Ryabov, A.A. 2012. Grazhdansko-pravovye osnovy izmeneniya kvalifikatsii sdelok v nalogovom prave [Civil-Legal Bases of Changes in the Qualification of Transactions in the Tax Law]. Tsivilist, 2: 30 40.
[13] Samoylov, E.Y. 2009. Dobrosovestnost' kak predposylka zashchity priobretatelya v grazhdanskom oborote [Fairness as a Prerequisite for the Protection of the Purchaser in the Civil Turnover]. Civil Law Bulletin, 3: 8-15.
[14] Sattarova, N.A. 2012. Sovremennye aspekty mezhotraslevykh svyazey finansovogo prava [Modern Aspects of Inter-Branch Relations in Financial Law]. Financial Law, 5: 11-14.
[15] Tasalov, F.A. 2014. Printsip razvitiya konkurentsii v kontraktnykh sistemakh Rossii i SShA: ponyatie, znachenie, garantii realizatsii [The Principle of Competition in the Contracting Systems of Russia and the United States: Concept, Value, Warranty of Implementation]. Law, 5: 146-152.
[16] Tatarnikov, A.V. 2010. Printsipy razumnosti i dobrosovestnosti v grazhdanskom prave Rossii [The Principles of Reasonableness and Fairness in the Russian Civil Law]. Dis. cand. jurid. Sciences. Moscow university ministry of the interior of Russia after V. Y. Kikot, Moscow.
[17] Verdiyan, G.V. 2012. Dobrosovestnost' v sisteme printsipov grazhdanskogo prava i osnovnykh nachal grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva [Fairness in the System of the Principles of Civil Law and the Basic Principles of Civil Law]. Russian justice, 11: 14-18.

*** Federal Acquisition Regulation. Title 48 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations. 1984. Available at: http://ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title48/48tab_02.tpl. (accessed September 9, 2016).
*** Obzor administrativnoy praktiki v sfere razmeshcheniya zakazov dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd. [Review of Administrative Practices in the Field of Order Placement for State and Municipal Needs]. 2011, April. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=CJI;n=55321. (accessed September 9, 2016).
*** Pis'mo Minekonomrazvitiya RF ot 2 maya 2007 g. No. 6121-ASh/D04 ‘O merakh po preduprezhdeniyu neblagopriyatnykh posledstviy ot deystviy nedobrosovestnykh postavshchikov (podryadchikov, ispolniteley) po gosudarstvennym i munitsipal'nym kontraktam’ [Letter of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Dated May 2, 2007 No. 6121-ASh/D04 ‘On measures to Prevent Adverse Effects on the Actions of Unfair Suppliers (Contractors, Executors) for State and Municipal Contracts’. 2007.
*** Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga po delu No. A40-44067/12-72-284 [Resolution of the FAS for Moscow District on the Case No. A40-44067/12-72-284]. 2013, January 31.
*** Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga po delu No. A40-57684/12-139-546 [Resolution of the FAS for Moscow District on the Case No. A40-57684/12-139-546]. 2013, February 12.
*** Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga po delu No. A29-3777/2012 [Resolution of the FAS for Volga-Vyatka District on the Case No. A29-3777/2012]. 2013, February 4.
Published
2017-03-05
How to Cite
MUSABIROVA, Dinara Anvarovna; HAMITOV, Radik Nakimovich. The Category of ‘Unfairness’ in the Contract System Legislation in Russia and the USA: Some Interpretation Issues. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 7, p. 1781-1788, mar. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/767>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2024.