Measures of Procedural Coercion in the Criminal Procedural Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Brief Analysis)
Abstract
The article considers issues related to the lack of conformity between the general logic of the criminal process and the actual norms of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan governing a coercive institution of the criminal process. The authors discuss complex issues on the purposes of measures of restriction and other measures of procedural coercion, and certain regulatory elements of this institution. They are described in detail as part of the study. This study applies the deductive method of research. The article analyzes a broad range of measures of criminal procedural coercion, including measures of restriction and other measures of procedural coercion, and ends with the authors’ conclusions on the problems connected with the application of the criminal procedural norms governing measures of coercion, the imperfection of certain criminal procedural norms under consideration, and the need to make some changes and amendments to the normative regulation of certain articles of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan constituting a part of measures of restriction and procedural coercion. A structure of measures of procedural coercion and their purposes has been established.
References
[2] Akhpanov, A.N. 1997. Problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: dis. doktora yurid. nauk [Issues of Criminal Procedural Coercion at the Stage of Preliminary Investigation (Doctoral Thesis)]. Karaganda Higher School at the National Security Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Karaganda.
[3] Alexandrov, A.S., Tomin, V.T., Kovtun, N.N., and Polyakov, M.P. 2003. Ugolovniy protsess Rossii [Criminal Process in Russia]. Moscow: Yurayt.
[4] Almukhamedov, B., and Bulatov, B. 2003. Privod i denezhnoe vzyskanie [Bringing and Monetary Penalty]. Zakonnost', 3: 22-23.
[5] Anashkin, O. 2003. Ischislenie sroka soderzhaniya pod strazhey [Calculation of Holding in Custody Period]. Zakonnost', 8: 43-44.
[6] Bachurin, S.N. 2013. Nekotorye kriticheskie zamechaniya i predlozheniya po proektu Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan v redaktsii ot 30 aprelya 2013 goda [Certain Critical Remarks and Suggestions on the Draft of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan as amended on April 30, 2013]. In D.T. Kenzhetaev (Eds.), Relevant Issues of Modern Science: Materials of International Research and Practice Conference Devoted to the 90-th Birthday Anniversary of Barimbek Sarsenovich Beisenov. Karaganda: Karaganda Academy at the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after Barimbek Beisenov, pp. 124-127.
[7] Bagautdinov, F.N. 2002. Novaya mera presecheniya v UPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii – domashniy arest [New Measure of Restriction in the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation – Home Arrest]. Zakonnost', 10: 14-16.
[8] Bagautdinov, F.N. 2003. Vremennoe otstranenie obvinyaemogo ot dolzhnosti [Temporary Dismissal of an Accused Person from the Post]. Zakonnost', 4: 13-15.
[9] Bulatov, B.B., and Nikolyuk, V.V. 2003. Mery ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya (po glave 14 UPK Rossii) [Measures of Criminal Procedural Coercion (as per Chapter 14, Criminal Procedural Code, Russian Federation)]. Moscow: Spark.
[10] Danilova, N.A., and Nikolaeva, T.G. 2014. Vozmozhno li prinuzhdenie na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela? [Is it Possible to Apply Coercion at the Stage of Instituting Criminal Proceedings?]. Criminal Procedural and Criminalistic Means to Guarantee the Efficiency of Criminal Proceedings: Materials of the International Research and Practice Conference. Irkutsk: Baikal University of Economics and Law, pp. 70-76.
[11] Gasanov, M. 2015. Ponyatie mer prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom protsesse Respubliki Kazakhstan [Notion of the Measures of Coercion in the Criminal Process of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. In D.T. Kenzhetaev (Eds.), Relevant Problems of Juridical and Social Sciences: Materials of the International Research and Theoretical Conference]. Karaganda: Karaganda Academy at the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after Barimbek Beisenov, pp. 143-144.
[12] Khanov, T.A. 2006. Imushchestvennye voprosy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Respubliki Kazakhstan: dis. doktora yurid. nauk [Property Issues in Criminal Proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Doctoral Thesis)]. Karaganda Judicial Institute at the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after Barimbek Beisenov. Karaganda.
[13] Kornukov, V.M. 1978. Mery protsessualnogo prinuzhdeniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Measures of Procedural Coercion in Criminal Proceedings]. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing Office.
[14] Koryakin, I.P. 1999. Problemy primeneniya sledovatelem otdachi nesovershennoletnego pod prismotr kak mery presecheniya [Issues of Applying Putting of a Minor under Supervision by the Investigator as a Measure of Restriction]. In A.N. Akhpanov (Ed.), Problems of the Criminal Procedural Law: Collection of Scientific Papers. Karaganda: Karaganda Higher School at the State Investigation Committee, pp. 130-142.
[15] Koryakin, I.P. 1999. Problemy obespecheniya nadlezhashchego povedeniya po delam ob organizovannoy prestupnosti [Issues of Guaranteeing Proper Behavior in Organized Crime Proceedings]. In I.A. Omarov (Eds.), Up-to-date Problems of Law: Collection of Scientific Papers by Young Scientists, Junior Scientific Assistants and Applicants. Karaganda: Karaganda Higher School at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, pp. 147-150.
[16] Magizov, R.R. 2004. Sudebnyy kontrol' za zakonnost'yu i obosnovannost'yu primeneniya mer protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Juditial Control over the Legality and Reasonableness of Applying Measures of Procedural Coercion (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Nizhny Novgorod Academy at the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Nizhny Novgorod.
[17] Mikhailov, V.A. 1996. Mery presecheniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Measures of Restriction in the Criminal Process of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Right and law.
[18] Petrukhin, I.L. 1989. Neprikosnovennost' lichnosti i prinuzhdenie v ugolovnom protsesse [Personal Integrity and Coercion in Criminal Procedure]. Moscow: Science
[19] Smirnov, S.V., and Koryakin, I.P. 1998. Problemy primeneniya sledovatelem mer presecheniya po delam o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh organizovannymi prestupnym gruppami [Issues of Applying Measures of Restriction by the Investigator in Respect of the Crimes, Committed by Organized Criminal Gangs]. In E.I. Ongarbayev (Eds.), Up-to-date Problems of Law: Collection of Scientific Papers by Young Scientists, Junior Scientific Assistants and Applicants. Karaganda: Karaganda Higher School at the State Investigation Committee, pp. 86-89.
[20] Tutynin, I.B. 2005. Nalozhenie aresta na imushchestvo kak mera ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya: dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Putting Property under Arrest as a Measure of Criminal Procedural Coercion (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Moscow University at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Moscow.
[21] Yenikeev, Z.D. 1979. Sotsial'naya tsennost' i effektivnost' mer ugolovno-protsessual'nogo presecheniya [Social Value and Efficiency of the Measures of Criminal Procedural Restriction]. Ufa: Bashkir University Publishing Office.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.