Improvement of Legislation and the Judicial System as the Guarantor of Political Stability of the Constitutional State

  • Kairat BALABIYEV Kazakhstan Engineering and Pedagogical University of People’s Friendship, Departament of Jurisprudence, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
  • Aizhan KAIPBAYEVA International University of Kyrgyzstan, Departament of Jurisprudence, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic
  • Saken MAZHINBEKOV M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University Departament of International Relations and Political Sciense, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
  • Saltanat IBRAIMOVA M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University Departament of Business and Commercialization, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

Abstract

The construction of a legal state in the post-Soviet space is impossible without an effective, free and open national judiciary as a regulator of social relations. The achievement of independence marked the task of creating a legal system that meets international standards to the Republic of Kazakhstan. A natural result of the lawmaking process was the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in 1995 - the basic Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the best of legacies of the twentieth century. Improvement of the legislative and procedural norms of activity of the courts, improvement of the judicial system, the introduction of alternative ways of resolving disputes and conflicts, provision of access to justice to large sectors of citizens, the increasing professionalism of the judiciary in Kazakhstan – are the main challenges of the near future. For post-Soviet countries, the norm is the lack of any elements of the national law, minimum standards of human rights, professionalism, objectivity and independence of the judiciary, as well as partial or complete pretentiousness of the Constitution. The study shows the steps that have been taken and envisaged to address these problems.

References

[1] Baudouin, Ch. 2014. The evolution of human rights and democracy fatigue in Europe. Paris: the Institute of Democracy and Cooperation. 262.
[2] Bradley, C.A. 2001. New York: Universal Jurisdiction and US Law. 323.
[3] Frolova, E.V. et al. 2016. Development of Social Infrastructure in the Management Practices of Local Authorities: Trends and Factors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15): 7421-7430
[4] Gattuso, J.L., and Katz, D. 2014. Red Tape Rising: Obama-Era Regulation at the Three-Year Mark. Available at: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/red-tape-rising-obama-era-regulation-at-the-three-year-mark
[5] Horwitz, H. 1977. Parliament, politics in the Reign of Willam III. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 326.
[6] Larkins, M.Ch. 1996. Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44(4): 605-626.
[7] Laughland, J. 2014. Limes, Rivista Italiana di Geopolitica. Available at: www.idc-europe.org
[8] Mami, K. 2014. The Country’s Judiciary is Working over Realization of Tasks set by the Head of State at the 6th Meeting of Judges. Astana: ‘Kazakhstanskaya Pravda’. 43.
[9] Mattias von Hellfeld. 2009. ‘Wir Europear’, Bildung Geschichte, Deutshe Welle. Available at: http://booktracker.org/viewtopic.php?t=61301
[10] Matveev, Y.V., et al. 2016. Globalization and Regionalization: Institution Aspect. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(8): 3114-3126
[11] Nazarbayev, N. 2014. Address to the people of Kazakhstan. Available at: http:capital.kz
[12] Nganunu, J.M. 2014. Judicial independence and economic development in the Commonwealth Julian Mukwesu Nganunu Commonwealth. Law Bulletin, 40(3): 113-144.
[13] Voermans, J.M. 2009. Concerns about the Quality of EU Legislation: What Kind of Problem, by What Kind of Standards? Erasmus Law Review, 1(2): 112-121.
[14] Zimanov, S.Z. 2001. The ancient world of Kazakh rights and its origins. Astana: Eurasian National University of L. Gumilyov. 187.

*** Access to the Counts equal Justice for all. 2004 Bureau of International formation programs. U.S.Department of State. Available at: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2004/08/20040819131231naneerg5.529422-e-02.html
*** Draft constitutional amendments to the Constitutional Law ‘Оn the Judicial Reform and the status of Judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2000. Available at: www.zakon.kz
*** Judicial Systems in Transition Economies. Assessing the Past, Looking to the Future. 2005. International Bank of Reconstruction and Development. 87.
*** The Kazakhstan’s way – 2050: Single goal, Single Interests, Single Future. 2014. Available at: www.yujanka.kz
*** Proceedings of the VI Republican Meeting of Judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2013. Available at: www.zakon.kz
*** Pudel’ka, J. 2014. GIZ Project Leader German Association of International Cooperation. ‘Support of the Legal and Judicial Reforms in the Countries of Central Asia. Available at: www.zakon.kz
*** Resource Guide on Strengthening Judicial Integrity and Capacity, p.5, 2011, © United Nations.
*** The Concept of Legal Reform up to 2020. 2009. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. ‘Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, 205(25949): 25-27.
*** The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 1995. Almaty: Legislator. 155.
Published
2017-03-01
How to Cite
BALABIYEV, Kairat et al. Improvement of Legislation and the Judicial System as the Guarantor of Political Stability of the Constitutional State. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 7, p. 1615-1625, mar. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/743>. Date accessed: 20 apr. 2024.