Some Questions Regarding the Harmonization of the Eurasian Economic Union States’ Labor Legislation
Abstract
This paper reflects modern approaches to the application of international norms and legal acts in the field of legal regulation of labor from the perspective of international labor law, the extension of international labor standards to the national legislation and vice versa – the influence of national legislation on the state of international labor law, with a view to finding possibilities of the rapprochement and harmonization of Eurasian Economic Union states’ labor legislations. The author describes how the bodies of legislative power effect the work of International labor law, labor legislation activities within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union, analyzed the negative and positive aspects of cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union, especially of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In this study, there were used methods of analysis, synthesis, as well as comparative-legal method as one of the main historical one. As a result of this study, there is a need to harmonize Eurasian Economic Union States’ labor legislation for the convergence of norms, rather than unification. Harmonization should take place by means of ratification in parliament of each Eurasian Economic Union state, as a separate statutory instrument. Taking into account national peculiarities of each state and developing legal projects that satisfy the state, based on recognized international principles and standards.
References
[2] Barry, N. 1962. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 163.
[3] Bercusson, B. 2007. The Trade Union Movement and the European Union: Judgment Day. European Law Journal, 3 (13): 308-319.
[4] Cartou, L. 2001. Communauté des europé ennes. Paris: Dalloz. 163.
[5] Chadwick, A. and Heffernan, R. 2003. Introduction: the new labour phenomenon. Oxford: Blackwell. 377.
[6] Frolova, E.V., Vinichenko, M.V., Kirillov, A.V., Rogach, O.V. and Kabanova, E.E. 2016. Development of Social Infrastructure in the Management Practices of Local Authorities: Trends and Factors. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15): 7421-7430.
[7] Fuerea, A. 2006. European Business Law, second edition, revised and added. Bucharest: Legal Universe.
[8] Golovina, S.Y. 2010. Revisiting the need for adopting a Basic EEC labor legislation. Labor law in Russia and abroad, 3: 2-4.
[9] Goodman, E. 2013. The Origins of Western Legal Tradition: From Thales to Tudors. Sydney: Federation Press. 263.
[10] Gorbach, L.A., Rajskaya, M.V., Aksianova, A.V., Morozov, A.V., Gusarova, I.A. and Sagdeeva, A.A. 2016. The structural Dynamics’ Nature of Innovative Development of Russian Economy in the Framework of its Technological Diversity. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15): 7392-7407.
[11] Kurennoy, A. 2014. A New Approach to Negotiations and Dispute Settlement. Message of the President, Rapporteur’s Reports and Invited Paper Abstracts. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the Industrial Relations Association. Washington: D.C. 266.
[12] Lyutov, N.L. 2010. Some thoughts concerning labor legislation harmonization within the EEC. Labor law in Russia and abroad, 3: 17 – 22.
[13] Matton, T.J. and Willaimson, J.G. 2002. National Bureau of Economic Research: What fundamentals drive world migration? Cambridge: MA. 633.
[14] Myullerson, R.A. 1982. Correlation between international and national law. Moscow: International relations. 432.
[15] Servais, J.M. 2009. International labor law. London: Macmillan. 362.
[16] Shesteryakov, I.V. 2010. The ways of harmonization of labor legislation of States-members of Eurasian economic community. Russian law journal, 1: 52-55.
[17] Tomaszewskiy, K. 2014. Workers’ Representation in Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities for the Works Councils’ System. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 421.
[18] Voicu, M. 2005. Community jurisprudence. Bucharest: Lumina Lex.109.
*** Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 1995. Almaty: Juris. 426.
*** The Laval and Viking Cases: Freedom of Services and Establishment v. Industrial Conflicts in European Union. 2009. Kluwer: Law International. 52.
*** Theory of state and law. 1999. Course of lectures. Moscow: Yurist. 362.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.