Problem of Definition of Personal Security in the Modern Russian Criminal Procedure
Abstract
The article represents comparison of various definitions and concepts related to the phenomenon of providing a secured protection of individuals participating in the Russian criminal procedure.References
[2] Brusnitsyn, L.V. 2001. Provision of Security to Persons Promoting Criminal Justice, International Experience in the XX c. (case study of procedural law). M.: OOO Izdatelstvo ‘Yurlitinform’.
[3] Brusnitsyn, L.V. 2002. Theoretical and Practical Fundamentals and World Experience in Ensuring Security of Persons Promoting Criminal Justice: thesis… Doctor of Legal Sciences, Moscow.
[4] Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 27 October 2006 No 630 (edited 15 October 2014) ‘On Ratifying Rules of Applying certain Security Measures to the Victims, Witnesses and other Participants in Criminal Proceedings’ , Corpus of legal acts of the Russian Federation. 06 November 2006. No 45. Art. 4708.
[5] Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 21 September 2012 No 953 (edited 30 January 2015) ‘On Ratifying Rules of Security Measures by Resettlement of the Protected Person to a Different place of Residence Related to victims, Witnesses and other Participants of the Criminal Proceeding’ // Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 26 September 2012 No 221.
[6] Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 13 July 2013 No 586 (edited 05 September 2014) ‘On Ratifying State Programme of ‘Ensuring Security to Victims, Witnesses and other Participants of the Criminal Proceedings for 2014-2015’ // Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation. 22 July 2013. No 29. Art. 3965.
[7] Epikhin, A.Y. 1995. Protection of Legal Rights and Interests of the Witness in Criminal Procedure: Thesis….Doctor of Legal Science M.
[8] Epikhin, A.Y. 2014. Interdisciplinary Issues of Qualification of Corpus Delicti in case of Deliberately Misleading Evidence, Conclusion of an Expert or a Specialist, or Misleading Interpretation (Art. 307 Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), Political, economic and sociocultural aspects of regional participation in the European North: materials of the Final (13th) All-Russia Science conference (October, 23-24 2014, Syktyvkar).: in 3 parts. – Syktyvkar: GOU VO KRGAiSU, 1, 89-97.
[9] Epikhin, A.Y. 2004. Conception of Ensuring Security of Persons in the sphere of criminal proceedings: Synopsis of thesis … of Doctor of Juridical Science, Nizhegorodskaya Akademiya of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Nizhny Novgorod.
[10] Epikhin, A.Y. 2004. Conception of Security of a Person in Criminal Proceedings: thesis… Doctor of Legal Sciences. Syktyvkar.
[11] Federal law of the Russian Federation ‘On Security’ of 5 March 1992 (edited 25 July 2002), Gazette of the Congress of people’s Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation. 1992. No 15. Art. 769; 1993. No 2. Art. 77.
[12] Rossiyskaya Gazeta. No 138-139. 30 July 2002. Lost legal force. The law that is in force now does not have a similar definition: Federal Law of 28 December 2010 No 390-Fl ‘On Security’, Rossiyskaya Gazeta. No 295. 29 December 2010.
[13] Federal Law of 20 April 1995 No 45-Fl (edited 03 February 2014) ‘On Public Protection of Judges, Officers of Law Enforcement and Monitoring Agencies’, Corpus of legal acts of the Russian Federation. 24 April 1995. No 17. Art. 1455.
[14] Federal Law of 20 April 2004 no 119-FL (edited 03 February 2014, amended 04 June 2014) ‘On Public Protection of Judges, Officers of Law Enforcement and Monitoring Agencies’, Corpus of legal acts of the Russian Federation. 23 August 2004. No 34. Art. 3534.
[15] Federal Law of 20 August 2004 No 119-FL (edited 03 February 2014, amended 04 June 2014) ‘On Public Protection of the Victims, Witnesses and other Participants in Criminal Procedure’, Corpus of legal acts of the Russian Federation. 23 August 2004. No 34. Art. 3534.
[16] Galuzin, O.A. 2004. About the Security Theory in Criminal Procedure, Ugolovnoe Pravo 1: 61–63.
[17] Galuzin, O.A. 2004. On Fundamentals of the Theory of Security of the Criminal Procedure, ‘Black Spots’ in the Russian legislation 1: 278–284.
[18] Ozhegov, S.I., and Shvedova, N.Y. 2003. Definitions Dictionary of the Russian Federation. – M., 41, 741.
[19] Polyakov, M.P. 1998. On Protection of the Accused and from the Accused, Gosudarstvo i Pravo 4: 94–98.
[20] Shchedrin, N.V. 2000. Introduction into Legal Theory of Security Measures. Krasnoyarsk, 46–67.
[21] Sorokina, Y. 1992. Protection at the Preliminary Hearing, Zakonnost 3: 60–61.
[22] Tikhomirov, l.V., and Tikhomirov, M.Y. 2001. Legal Encyclopedia. 5th edition, amended and supplemented, Edited by M/ Y. Tikhomirov. – M., 82.
[23] Zaitsev, O.A. 1999. Theoretical and Practical fundamentals of Public Protection of Participants in Criminal Proceeding in the Russian Federation: thesis…Doctor of Legal Sciences. Moscow
[24] Zaytsev, O.A. 2001. Public Protection of Participants in a Criminal Case. M. Examen.
Keywords
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.