Legal Reform as an Administrative Decision: The Risks and Performance Criteria

  • Valentina Yu SMORGUNOVA Department of Theory of Law and Civil-Legal Education, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Аleksandra А. DORSKAIA Department of International Law, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Dmitriy А. PASHENTSEV Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Moscow City Teacher Training University, Moscow, Russia
  • Evgeniya M. PAVLENKO Department of International Law and Human Rights, Moscow City Teacher Training University, Moscow, Russia
  • Marina V. IGNATIEVA Department of International Law, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

The article discusses various approaches to the definition of the concept of legal reform: legal reform is the reform of legislation or legal reform is the change of the sense of justice. It is shown that the decision to start the development and implementation of a legal reform in any country of the world can only be taken by public authorities. The successful as well as the failed reforms are attributed to social upheaval. Risks of legal reforms’ implementation are identified and characterized. The quality of life improvement can be associated with an increase in material well-being, and expressed in greater security, the preventive measures of the state to prevent the commission of crimes, raising the level of legal awareness, the development of law enforcement practice. It is human and civil rights that can serve as the indicator that reveals the true purpose of a specific legal reform. The possible classification of legal reforms and the criteria for their performance are analyzed (stability of certain legal reforms; temporary certainty; improve in the quality of life, if not every member of society, but the majority; parallelism of legal reforms and reforms in the public system; small number of laws; compliance of national legislation with international legal standards; state of legal education).

References

[1] Farrar, J. 1974. Law Reform and the Law Commission. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
[2] Grigoriev, O.V. 2011. Legal reforms – the answer to the challenges of social destruction. Administrative and municipal law, 8: 12-14.
[3] Malkov, V.P. 1990. Law Reform and its main directions. Kazan: Kazan University Publisher.
[4] Matchanova, Z.Sh. 2009. Basic approaches to the classification of terrorism. Actual problems of modern science, 6(1): 147-152.
[5] Polenina, S.V., Gavrilov, O.A., and Koldaeva, N.P. 2008. Problems with Interaction between Legal Systems in a Globalized World. Representative Power – Centure, 21(1): 7-11.
[6] Shitaha, I. 1998. Legal reform. Theory and practice. Moscow: Beliye Alvi.
[7] Sokolov, N.Ya. 2006. The legal reform from the view-point of lawyer. State and Law, 6: 5-13.
[8] Sorokin, V.V. 2004. Legal reform and transition in the Russian Federation. In: V.Y. Muzyukina, V.V. Sorokin (eds.). The Constitution and legal reform in Russia: Interuniversity collection of scientific articles. Barnaul: Publishing House of the University of Altai. pp. 11-58.
[9] Tkachenko, S.V. 2013. Western legal tradition as a reception right in the Russian legal reform 1990-ies. Law and State: The Theory and Practice, 1(98): 35-39.
[10] Walker, D.M. 1980. The Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Whelan, D. 1988. The Comparative Method and Law Reform. Dublin: University College Dublin.
[12] Yakovlev, V.F. 1991. Legal reform in the Soviet Union under the conditions of transition to the market: (Transcript of the lecture). Moscow: Znanie.
[13] Yakovlev, V.F. 2006. Russian system of law: challenges and achievements. Law, 8: 4-8.
*** Ireland’s Law Reform Commission Act 1975 (No.3 of 1975), Available at: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1975/en/act/pub/0003/index.html
*** Message from the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly on the strengthening of the Russian state (1994). The main directions of domestic and foreign policy. February 24, 1994. Russian newspaper, 25(02): 38.
*** Towards the rule of law: Soviet legal reform and human rights under Perestroika (1989). New York: US Helsinki watch comm.
Published
2017-02-11
How to Cite
SMORGUNOVA, Valentina Yu et al. Legal Reform as an Administrative Decision: The Risks and Performance Criteria. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 6, p. 1494-1499, feb. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/643>. Date accessed: 14 nov. 2024.

Keywords

administrative decision; Russia; legal reform; performance criteria of reforms; reforms classification; risks