Trading in Influence: Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Aspects

  • Zhanat Askarovna MAMITOVA Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy, Akmola region, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Yerbol Omarov AGBAYEVICH Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy, Akmola region, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Askar Bolatovich TALKIBAYEV Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy, Akmola region, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Aigul Tanabugovna IRUBAYEVA Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy, Akmola region, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

The paper deals with the practice of criminalization of trading in influence by the lawmakers of the former Soviet Union and other foreign countries. Comparative approach to the solution of the criminal policy problems of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the fight against corruption was supported by the conducted sociological researches. The problems of the qualification in the law-enforcement activities were considered from various angles with regard to which applicable and inapplicable attributes of trading in influence in the context of the Kazakhstan legal environment were depicted. In particular, the comparison of this criminal action with the other crimes was carried out, in the course of which trading in influence appeared to be a separate crime with its peculiar objective and subjective attributes. Besides, the authors considered the problems of international cooperation in the absence of criminalization of trading in influence by the legislation of Kazakhstan. Particularly, they also developed the legal grounds for refusal of rendering legal assistance in legal cases, including for reasons of absence of the crime dual criminality. The research of the international conventions and the national legislation allowed revealing the problems of regulating the cooperation in domestic standards, as well as suggesting their bringing to conformity with the requirements of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. As a result of the research the authors formulated the conclusion about the necessity of incorporating the ‘Trading in Influence’ separate crime components to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as offered the draft of the description of the punishable offence.

References

[1] Binkley, S. 2016. ‘Anti-Racism beyond Empathy: Transformations in the Knowing and Governing of Racial Difference’. Critical Psychology, 2: 181-204.
[2] Fuller, C.S. 2016. ‘The Perils of Privacy Regulation’. The Review of Austrian Economics, 1: 106-122.
[3] Jong, M.D., and Stagnol, L.A. 2016. ‘Fundamental Bond Index Including Solvency Criteria’. Journal of Asset Management, 4: 280-294.
[4] Osminin, B.I. 2010. Conclusion and Implementation of International Contracts and Domestic Law. Infotropik Media.
[5] Raj, K.C. 2002. ‘Corruption and Human Rights’. Indian National Magazine from the Publishers of the HINDU, 1: 14-17.
[6] Rose-Ackerman, S. 2010. Corruption: Greed, Culture, and the State. The Yale Law Journal. Available at: http://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/corruption-greed-culture-and-the-state
[7] Safarov, B.A. 2014. ‘Forms and Ways of Implementation of International Legal Acts on Human Rights to the Domestic Legal System’. Gaps in the Russian Legislation, 1: 231-236.
[8] Sahoo, S. 2016. ‘Analyzing Research Performance: Proposition of a New Complementary Index’. Scientometrics, 1: 81-86.
[9] Sarsembaev, M.A. 2010. ‘The Law of International Contracts in the Context of the International Contract Legislation’. Kazakhstan Legislation Institute Bulletin, 17: 65-71.
[10] Slingerland, W. 2011. ‘The Fight against Trading in Influence’. Public Policy and Administration, 1: 53-66.
*** Anti-Corruption Reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia Progress and Challenges. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
*** Code of Criminal Procedure of the French Republic. Inserted by Law No. 2000-516 of 15 June 2000 Article 1 Official Journal of 16 June 2000. Available at: http://www.legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/1674/file/848f4569851e2ea7eabfb2ffcd70.htm/preview
*** Draft of Federal Law on Amending the Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation for Harsher Punishment for Corruption Crimes and Criminalization of Trading in Influence. Available at: http://genproc.gov.ru
*** International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 16 December 1966. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
*** Report of the Third Round of the Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan ‘Anti-Corruption Reforms in Kazakhstan’. Available at: http://www.oecd.org
*** The Criminal Code of French Republic. Available at: http://law.edu.ru
*** The Criminal Code of Republic of Moldova dated 18 April 2002. Available at: http://www.legislationline.org.
Published
2017-02-11
How to Cite
MAMITOVA, Zhanat Askarovna et al. Trading in Influence: Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Aspects. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 6, p. 1450-1460, feb. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/637>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024.

Keywords

implementation; United Nations Convention against Corruption; international contracts; trading in influence; crime; international cooperation; rendering legal assistance; confiscation; extradition; dual criminality