Legal Aspects of Customs Activity in the Framework of the EAEC
Abstract
Over the considered steps mechanism customs regulations of the Customs, and then the Eurasian Economic Union has evolved and acquired a certain resemblance to the same mechanisms that exist in most developed countries. At the same time the modern mechanism of customs regulation of foreign trade activities EAEC is significantly different for the projects impact on the mechanisms used by most of the countries with an open market economy, which is largely a consequence of the ‘pendulum’ fluctuations of foreign economic policy of the Member States EAEC of liberalization to protectionism, timing differences of formation measures state regulation of foreign economic sphere, inconsistent implementation of the customs control measures, accumulated over the years of reform the complex contradictions between the state of the external economic complex and the mechanism of customs regulation of foreign trade activities, underestimating the negative aspects of joining the WTO.Despite the fact that the legislation of the EAEC contains all the main foreign trade regulation instruments used in leading foreign countries, for the practical application of many of them it was not created the necessary institutional, informational, technical, human resources base at the national level. Customs regulation of foreign trade activities in the Member States EAEC is not advancing and catching character, it is a reaction to the destabilization of the foreign economic sphere, that does not allow effective use of this mechanism in the implementation of the strategic priorities of the external economic complex.
The current state of the mechanism of customs regulation of foreign trade activities EAEC does not match its potential, is not conducive to prevent counterproductive asymmetry between the structure of exports and imports of goods, which ultimately affects the possibilities of enhancing the quality of life and economic growth, leading to a failure in conditions of aggravated international pressure to support the domestic industry, foreign direct investment, the improvement of the trade balance. At the present stage of economic reforms are particularly important concerted efforts of Member States EAEC on regulatory, institutional, economic, informational support of the modernization of customs regulation of foreign trade mechanism EAEC.
Taking into account all the complex factors determining the status and prospects of development of foreign economic systems of the Member States EAEC obvious need for urgent steps towards a holistic mechanism of customs regulation of foreign trade activities that will prevent losses and risks associated with the adaptation of the Member States to the new, as yet imperfect conditions EAEC operation and participation in the WTO, including the possible increase in transaction costs of participants of foreign trade activities, infringing the interests of certain groups of domestic producers, intergovernmental overflow of funds, ‘overflow’ of trade flows to countries with lower customs costs.
New challenges facing the Member States EAEC require efficient use of adaptive capabilities of customs regulation mechanism of foreign trade, which allows on the basis of comprehensive operational analysis to develop plans for preventive measures of customs regulation, to find effective strategies to incorporate the Russian participants of foreign economic activity in the global economic system and, in the final finally, to ensure the implementation of national interests in foreign economic sphere.
References
[1] Abramov, R. 2016. Understanding Professionalism in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia: an Analytical Review. The American Sociologist, 47 (1): 81-101. doi: 10.1007/s12108-015-9294-5
[2] Anisimov, A. M., and Shirov, A.A. 2013. Problems concerning the development of scenarios for the evaluation of the long-term effects of integration processes in the post-soviet territory. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 24 (5): 401-408. doi: 10.1134/s107570071305002x
[3] Baturo, A. 2016. From Patronal First Secretary to Patronal President: Post-Soviet Political Regimes in Context. In Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, 29-59. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[4] Belousov, L., and Vlasov, A. 2010. The Post-Soviet Space: A Transition Period. Transition Studies Review, 17 (1): 108-122. doi: 10.1007/s11300-010-0130-x
[5] Cadier, D. 2015. Policies towards the Post-Soviet Space: The Eurasian Economic Union as an Attempt to Develop Russia’s Structural Power? In Russia’s Foreign Policy: Ideas, Domestic Politics and External Relations, edited by David Cadier and Margot Light, 156-174. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[6] Duncan, P. J. S. 2004. Westernism, Eurasianism and Pragmatism: The Foreign Policies of the Post-Soviet States, 1991–2001. In The Legacy of the Soviet Union, edited by Wendy Slater and Andrew Wilson, 228-253. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[7] Kobrinskaya, I. 2007. The Post-Soviet Space: From the USSR to the Commonwealth of Independent States and Beyond. In The CIS, the EU and Russia: The Challenges of Integration, edited by Katlijn Malfliet, Lien Verpoest and Evgeny Vinokurov, 13-21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[8] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. Institutional Integration: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet History. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 37-53. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[9] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. Sub-National Actors in Post-Soviet Integration. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 101-107. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[10] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. The Political Economy of Post-Soviet Integration. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 86-100. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[11] Loftus, S., and Kanet, R. E. 2015. Whose Playground Is It, Anyway? Power Rivalries in Post-Soviet Space. In Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia: Foreign Policy in a Contested Region, edited by Roger E. Kanet and Matthew Sussex, 15-41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[12] Malinova, O. 2010. Defining and Redefining Russianness: The Concept of ‘Empire’ in Public Discourses in Post-Soviet Russia. In The Challenges of Ethno-Nationalism: Case Studies in Identity Politics, edited by Adrian Guelke, 60-77. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[13] McMillan, C. H. 1996. Foreign Investment in Russia: Soviet Legacies and Post-Soviet Prospects. In Foreign Investment in Russia and Other Soviet Successor States, edited by Patrick Artisien-Maksimenko and Yuri Adjubei, 41-72. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[14] Melchior, A. 2015. Post-Soviet Trade, the Russia’s Far East and the Shift to Asia. In International Cooperation in the Development of Russia’s Far East and Siberia, edited by Jing Huang and Alexander Korolev, 61-96. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[15] Saivetz, C. R. 1998. Post-Soviet Russian Foreign Policy: Domestic Debates, the ‘Near Abroad’ and the West. In Post-Communist States in the World Community, edited by William E. Ferry and Roger E. Kanet, 21-45. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[16] Vinokurov, E., and Libman, A. 2012. From Post-Soviet to Eurasian Integration. In Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism, 201-212. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[17] Vinokurov, E., and Libman, A. 2012. The Scope of Eurasian Integration. In Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism, 9-29. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[18] Wengle, S. A. 2012. Post-Soviet Developmentalism and the Political Economy of Russia’s Electricity Sector Liberalization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47 (1):75-114. doi: 10.1007/s12116-011-9096-x
[19] White, S., and Feklyunina, V. 2014. Europe’ and the Post-Soviet Republics since 1991. In Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: The Other Europes, 51-98. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[2] Anisimov, A. M., and Shirov, A.A. 2013. Problems concerning the development of scenarios for the evaluation of the long-term effects of integration processes in the post-soviet territory. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 24 (5): 401-408. doi: 10.1134/s107570071305002x
[3] Baturo, A. 2016. From Patronal First Secretary to Patronal President: Post-Soviet Political Regimes in Context. In Semi-Presidentialism in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup, 29-59. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[4] Belousov, L., and Vlasov, A. 2010. The Post-Soviet Space: A Transition Period. Transition Studies Review, 17 (1): 108-122. doi: 10.1007/s11300-010-0130-x
[5] Cadier, D. 2015. Policies towards the Post-Soviet Space: The Eurasian Economic Union as an Attempt to Develop Russia’s Structural Power? In Russia’s Foreign Policy: Ideas, Domestic Politics and External Relations, edited by David Cadier and Margot Light, 156-174. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[6] Duncan, P. J. S. 2004. Westernism, Eurasianism and Pragmatism: The Foreign Policies of the Post-Soviet States, 1991–2001. In The Legacy of the Soviet Union, edited by Wendy Slater and Andrew Wilson, 228-253. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[7] Kobrinskaya, I. 2007. The Post-Soviet Space: From the USSR to the Commonwealth of Independent States and Beyond. In The CIS, the EU and Russia: The Challenges of Integration, edited by Katlijn Malfliet, Lien Verpoest and Evgeny Vinokurov, 13-21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[8] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. Institutional Integration: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet History. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 37-53. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[9] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. Sub-National Actors in Post-Soviet Integration. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 101-107. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[10] Libman, A., and Vinokurov, E. 2012. The Political Economy of Post-Soviet Integration. In Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration, 86-100. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[11] Loftus, S., and Kanet, R. E. 2015. Whose Playground Is It, Anyway? Power Rivalries in Post-Soviet Space. In Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia: Foreign Policy in a Contested Region, edited by Roger E. Kanet and Matthew Sussex, 15-41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[12] Malinova, O. 2010. Defining and Redefining Russianness: The Concept of ‘Empire’ in Public Discourses in Post-Soviet Russia. In The Challenges of Ethno-Nationalism: Case Studies in Identity Politics, edited by Adrian Guelke, 60-77. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[13] McMillan, C. H. 1996. Foreign Investment in Russia: Soviet Legacies and Post-Soviet Prospects. In Foreign Investment in Russia and Other Soviet Successor States, edited by Patrick Artisien-Maksimenko and Yuri Adjubei, 41-72. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[14] Melchior, A. 2015. Post-Soviet Trade, the Russia’s Far East and the Shift to Asia. In International Cooperation in the Development of Russia’s Far East and Siberia, edited by Jing Huang and Alexander Korolev, 61-96. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[15] Saivetz, C. R. 1998. Post-Soviet Russian Foreign Policy: Domestic Debates, the ‘Near Abroad’ and the West. In Post-Communist States in the World Community, edited by William E. Ferry and Roger E. Kanet, 21-45. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[16] Vinokurov, E., and Libman, A. 2012. From Post-Soviet to Eurasian Integration. In Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism, 201-212. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[17] Vinokurov, E., and Libman, A. 2012. The Scope of Eurasian Integration. In Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism, 9-29. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[18] Wengle, S. A. 2012. Post-Soviet Developmentalism and the Political Economy of Russia’s Electricity Sector Liberalization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47 (1):75-114. doi: 10.1007/s12116-011-9096-x
[19] White, S., and Feklyunina, V. 2014. Europe’ and the Post-Soviet Republics since 1991. In Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: The Other Europes, 51-98. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Published
2017-02-11
How to Cite
DOSSYMBEKOVA, Maryam et al.
Legal Aspects of Customs Activity in the Framework of the EAEC.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 6, p. 1346-1361, feb. 2017.
ISSN 2068-696X.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/617>. Date accessed: 27 dec. 2024.
Section
Articles
Keywords
customs factor; union; education; documents regulation
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.