Evaluation Methods of Consumer Satisfaction with Infrastructure Services

  • Zhannat Salavatovna AIMESHEVA Almaty branch of the St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

The paper deals with methodological aspects of understanding of the place of infrastructure and services rendered on its basis to customers. Infrastructure services are differentiated by measures and methods of carrying out in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Consumer preferences are analyzed based on the private and state approach to the problems range of provided services and selection of potential institutional forms is substantiated. An analysis of system operator’ service activity technical-economic indicators is carried out. Market infrastructure services are systematized, the subject matter of infrastructure services in the electric industry is revealed. The evaluation procedure for system operators’ service quality in the electric industry based on power supply reliability and stability indicators is developed. Calculations of mathematical and statistical characteristics of customers’ partial estimates (given scores) as random values with the normal probability law (density function) are made.

References

[1] Asgary, N., and Li, G. 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Economic Impact and Link to the Bullwhip Effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 4: 665-681.
[2] Baldi, F. 2016. Multi-unit Franchising Strategies: A Real Options Logic. Economia e Politica Industriale, 2: 175-217.
[3] Bansal, S. et al. 2016. Generalized semantic Web service composition. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2: 111-133.
[4] Barnay, T. 2016. Health, work and working conditions: a review of the European economic literature. The European Journal of Health Economics, 6: 693-709.
[5] Chandra, S. et al. 2016. Outbound logistics management practices in the automotive industry: an emerging economy perspective. DECISION, 2: 145-165.
[6] Chen, C. et al. 2016. Corporate Codes of Ethics, National Culture, and Earnings Discretion: International Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 1: 1-23.
[7] Chew, E.K. 2016. iSIM: An integrated design method for commercializing service innovation. Information Systems Frontiers, 3: 457-478.
[8] Fabling, R., and Mare, D.C. 2016. Firm-Level Hiring Difficulties: Persistence, Business Cycle And Local Labour Market Influences. Journal of Labor Research, 2: 179-210.
[9] Freise, M. 2016. Substituting for the State? Friendship Societies in Germany. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1: 1-20.
[10] Gracia, M.D., and Quezada, L.E. 2016. A framework for strategy formulation in sustainable supply chains: a case study in the electric industry. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 1: 3-27.
[11] Krishnaraju, V. et al. 2016. Web personalization for user acceptance of technology: An empirical investigation of E-government services. Information Systems Frontiers, 3: 579-595.
[12] Lin, Z., and Kwan, R.S.K. 2016. Local convex hulls for a special class of integer multicommodity flow problems. Computational Optimization and Applications, 3: 881-919.
[13] Meissner, M. et al. 2016. Towards a broad understanding of innovation and its importance for innovation policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1: 1-28.
[14] Milutinovic, B. et al. 2016. Application of fuzzy logic for evaluation of the level of social acceptance of waste treatment. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 1: 1-13.
[15] Neelaveni, C., and Manimaran, S. 2016. Structural equation modeling for analysing the impact of quality of administrative practices in higher educational institutions. Quality and Quantity. 4: 63-74.
[16] Recupero, D.R. et al. 2016. An Innovative, Open, Interoperable Citizen Engagement Cloud Platform for Smart Government and Users’ Interaction. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2: 388-412.
[17] Spector, B.I. 2016. The benefits of anti-corruption programming: implications for low to lower middle income countries. Crime, Law and Social Change, 4: 423-442.
[18] Trappey, A.J.C. et al. 2016. A one-stop logistic services framework supporting global supply chain collaboration. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2: 229-253.
[19] Yadav, R., and Mahara, T. 2016. An exploratory study to investigate value chain of Saharanpur wooden carving handicraft cluster. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1: 1-8.
[20] Yang, T. et al. 2016. Perceiving who and when to leverage data delivery for maritime networks: An optimal stopping view. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 4: 656-669.
Published
2017-02-11
How to Cite
AIMESHEVA, Zhannat Salavatovna. Evaluation Methods of Consumer Satisfaction with Infrastructure Services. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 6, p. 1277-1286, feb. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/601>. Date accessed: 14 nov. 2024.

Keywords

type of economic activity; infrastructure services; service systematization; service quality evaluation; efficient management; consumer satisfaction