To a Question about the Criteria and Parameters of the Effectiveness of the Government in Democratic Countries
Abstract
Effective public management activities are an important factor in the development of the modern state, the key to social progress. Management as a scientific organization activity is an essential element in the efficient and effective functioning of government. Estimation of efficiency of public administration is needed for both public authorities and society. It allows the company to control the quality of the activities of state institutions and leaders and public servants need for self-control and improve the administrative process. Performance measurement problem – It is a problem, first of all, the analysis of management activities and decisions. The growing diversity of modern societies, global threats and risks, migration crisis, new geopolitical fractures - all this and much more makes higher demands to the systems of government, which not only have to respond quickly to rapidly changing reality, but also to anticipate, predict, construct this reality. What should be government controlled system in a non-linear reality to be effective? How can you determine the very effectiveness of public administration in terms valent requests and expectations of the population? Criteria and parameters of efficiency of public administration, which would have been authentic real needs of society rather than small groups of political class, is necessary both to public authorities and society itself. Her presence will allow the public to monitor the quality of the activities of state institutions, and government and public officials – to improve the quality of public services provided to the population.The authors show that in the last decade in the evaluation of the effectiveness of public sector management prevails integrated approach that includes a set of individual indicators characterizing various aspects of the effectiveness of the government.
In official documents containing the relevant assessment methodology presents different approaches to the formation, the system of indicators, which are used in different countries in order to measure the quality of public services provided by the public authorities. However, this quantification of the quality of public services provided at various levels of government in the Russian Federation, still needs both theoretical reflection and building the mechanisms of its implementation in practice of public administration in view of Russian realities.
References
[1] Abramov, R.A. 2016. Features of development and functioning of the innovative development of municipalities. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research, 3(1): 112-115.
[2] Amirgholy, M., Rezaeestakhruie, H., and Poorzahedy, H. 2015. Multi-objective cordon price design to control long run adverse traffic effects in large urban areas. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 16(1): 1-52. doi:10.1007/s11066-015-9092-9
[3] Arasti, Z., Zarei, H., and Didehvar, F. 2015. Identifying the Evaluative Indicators of Regulatory Policies for the Development of Social Entrepreneurship. Public Organization Review, 15(3): 453-474. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0282-y
[4] Astrini, N.J. 2015. Local Government Performance Measurement: Developing Indicators Based on IWA 4: 2009. Public Organization Review, 15(3): 365-381. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0276-9
[5] Bizikova, L., Pintér, L., and Tubiello, N. 2015. Normative scenario approach: a vehicle to connect adaptation planning and development needs in developing countries. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7): 1433-1446. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0705-x
[6] Buettner, T., and Janeba, E. 2015. City competition for the creative class. Journal of Cultural Economics 1-39. doi:10.1007/s10824-015-9258-1
[7] Cooke, P. 2015. Green governance and green clusters: regional and national policies for the climate change challenge of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1(1): 1-17. doi:10.1186/s40852-015-0002-z
[8] Da Silva, V. R. F. et al. 2015. Adaptive threat management framework: integrating people and turtles. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9716-0
[9] Dietrichson, J., and Ellegård, L. M. 2015. Institutions improving fiscal performance: evidence from Swedish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(5): 861-886. doi:10.1007/s10797-014-9334-z
[10] DuPree, E.S. 2015. Highly reliable behaviors. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 4(1): 1-3. doi:10.1186/s13584-015-0048-1
[11] Huang, M., and Yeh, L. 2015. Should the Fed take extra action for the recent housing bubble? Evidence from asymmetric transitory shocks. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(4): 762-781. doi:10.1007/s12197-014-9281-7
[12] Janský, P. 2015. Updating the Rich Countries’ Commitment to Development Index: How They Help Poorer Ones through Curbing Illicit Financial Flows. Social Indicators Research, 124(1): 43-65. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0779-3
[13] Kaplan, R.S, and Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
[14] Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 2000. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[15] Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 2008. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
[16] Karimi, E., Schmitt, K., and Akgunduz, A. 2015. Effect of individual protective behaviors on influenza transmission: an agent-based model. Health Care Management Science, 18(3): 318-333. doi:10.1007/s10729-014-9310-2
[17] Kearney, C., and Morris, M.H. 2015. Strategic renewal as a mediator of environmental effects on public sector performance. Small Business Economics, 45(2): 425-445. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9639-z
[18] Kurland, N.B., and Aleci, L.S. 2015. From civic institution to community place: the meaning of the public market in modern America. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(3): 505-521. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9579-2
[19] Mukhaev, R.T., and Abramova. O.G. 2016. Criteria of efficiency of modern public administration systems: the problem of quantifying the quality of public administration. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 7(1): 146-154.
[20] Nakaya, J. 2015. Thinking social media from ethical viewpoint. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1): 1-13. doi:10.1007/s13520-015-0040-4
[21] Patrizii, V., and Resce, G. 2015. Public Sector Contribution to Competitiveness. Italian Economic Journal, 1(3): 401-443. doi:10.1007/s40797-015-0017-4
[22] Public Service 2000: The Renewal of the Public Service of Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1990.
[23] Samset, K., and Christensen, T. 2015. Ex Ante Project Evaluation and the Complexity of Early Decision-Making. Public Organization Review, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11115-015-0326-y
[24] Yu, D., and Zhou, R. 2015. Intellectual Management: An Integrative Theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-28. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0305-0
[2] Amirgholy, M., Rezaeestakhruie, H., and Poorzahedy, H. 2015. Multi-objective cordon price design to control long run adverse traffic effects in large urban areas. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 16(1): 1-52. doi:10.1007/s11066-015-9092-9
[3] Arasti, Z., Zarei, H., and Didehvar, F. 2015. Identifying the Evaluative Indicators of Regulatory Policies for the Development of Social Entrepreneurship. Public Organization Review, 15(3): 453-474. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0282-y
[4] Astrini, N.J. 2015. Local Government Performance Measurement: Developing Indicators Based on IWA 4: 2009. Public Organization Review, 15(3): 365-381. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0276-9
[5] Bizikova, L., Pintér, L., and Tubiello, N. 2015. Normative scenario approach: a vehicle to connect adaptation planning and development needs in developing countries. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7): 1433-1446. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0705-x
[6] Buettner, T., and Janeba, E. 2015. City competition for the creative class. Journal of Cultural Economics 1-39. doi:10.1007/s10824-015-9258-1
[7] Cooke, P. 2015. Green governance and green clusters: regional and national policies for the climate change challenge of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1(1): 1-17. doi:10.1186/s40852-015-0002-z
[8] Da Silva, V. R. F. et al. 2015. Adaptive threat management framework: integrating people and turtles. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10668-015-9716-0
[9] Dietrichson, J., and Ellegård, L. M. 2015. Institutions improving fiscal performance: evidence from Swedish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(5): 861-886. doi:10.1007/s10797-014-9334-z
[10] DuPree, E.S. 2015. Highly reliable behaviors. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 4(1): 1-3. doi:10.1186/s13584-015-0048-1
[11] Huang, M., and Yeh, L. 2015. Should the Fed take extra action for the recent housing bubble? Evidence from asymmetric transitory shocks. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(4): 762-781. doi:10.1007/s12197-014-9281-7
[12] Janský, P. 2015. Updating the Rich Countries’ Commitment to Development Index: How They Help Poorer Ones through Curbing Illicit Financial Flows. Social Indicators Research, 124(1): 43-65. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0779-3
[13] Kaplan, R.S, and Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
[14] Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 2000. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[15] Kaplan, R.S., and Norton, D.P. 2008. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
[16] Karimi, E., Schmitt, K., and Akgunduz, A. 2015. Effect of individual protective behaviors on influenza transmission: an agent-based model. Health Care Management Science, 18(3): 318-333. doi:10.1007/s10729-014-9310-2
[17] Kearney, C., and Morris, M.H. 2015. Strategic renewal as a mediator of environmental effects on public sector performance. Small Business Economics, 45(2): 425-445. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9639-z
[18] Kurland, N.B., and Aleci, L.S. 2015. From civic institution to community place: the meaning of the public market in modern America. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(3): 505-521. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9579-2
[19] Mukhaev, R.T., and Abramova. O.G. 2016. Criteria of efficiency of modern public administration systems: the problem of quantifying the quality of public administration. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 7(1): 146-154.
[20] Nakaya, J. 2015. Thinking social media from ethical viewpoint. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1): 1-13. doi:10.1007/s13520-015-0040-4
[21] Patrizii, V., and Resce, G. 2015. Public Sector Contribution to Competitiveness. Italian Economic Journal, 1(3): 401-443. doi:10.1007/s40797-015-0017-4
[22] Public Service 2000: The Renewal of the Public Service of Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1990.
[23] Samset, K., and Christensen, T. 2015. Ex Ante Project Evaluation and the Complexity of Early Decision-Making. Public Organization Review, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11115-015-0326-y
[24] Yu, D., and Zhou, R. 2015. Intellectual Management: An Integrative Theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-28. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0305-0
Published
2017-02-11
How to Cite
ABRAMOV, Ruslan A.; MUKHAEV, Rashid T.; SOKOLOV, Maxim S..
To a Question about the Criteria and Parameters of the Effectiveness of the Government in Democratic Countries.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 6, p. 1248-1262, feb. 2017.
ISSN 2068-696X.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/598>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024.
Section
Articles
Keywords
government effectiveness; criteria and parameters of efficiency; system of government; legitimacy and legality control
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.