Difficulties of Differentiating between Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights on the Basis of the Case-Law Research Report ‘Internet: Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’

  • Marina Alexandrovna ROZHKOVA Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of non-obvious difference between Human Rights and Intellectual Property Rights which often hinders their proper enforcement and protection. Methodological tools for the study are represented by a set of interrelated methods, techniques and methodologies. Elaboration depth of the posed scientific problem is provided, in particular, by such method of cognition as diachronic and synchronic comparison. The main idea of this article states that it is necessary to identify the demarcation line to distinguish between the abovementioned rights, which would enable proper implementation and protection of the rights of the parties concerned. Considering their high economic value and relation to the property issues, Intellectual Property Rights (as a part of economic rights) can be classified as ‘Property’, according to Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. However, moral rights, dealing with the realization of the creative potential and the personality of the Intellectual Property creator, are not recognized as ‘Property’ and are not protected by Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In some cases, they can obtain protection under other provisions of the Convention (e.g. Article 10).

References

[1] A.D. v. the Netherlands, 11.04.1994, No 21962/93.
[2] Akdaş v. Turkey, 16.02.2010, No. 41056/04.
[3] Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C. 2012. Freedom of Expression and the Internet. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. ISBN 978-92-871-7702-5.
[4] Civil Code of the Russian Federation. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/details.jsp?id=15809) (accessed 09/08/2016).
[5] Code de la propriété intellectuelle. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=16057 (accessed 09/08/2016).
[6] Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2006, 163-169. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf (accessed 09/08/2016).
[7] Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/treaties/text.jsp?file_id=283854 (accessed 09/08/2016).
[8] Editions Plon v. France, 18.05.2004, No. 58148/00.
[9] Gasus Dosier- und Fördertechnik GmbH v. the Netherlands, 23.02.1995, No. 15375/89.
[10] Geiger, C. 2006. ‘Constitutionalising’ Intellectual Property Law? The Influence of Fundamental Rights on Intellectual Property in the European Union. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37(4): 371-406.
[11] Internet: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_internet_ENG.pdf (accessed 09/08/2016).
[12] Helfer, L. R., and Graeme W. A. 2011. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521711258.
[13] Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, and Okediji, R. L. 2008. Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright: Final Report. The Open Society Institute.
[14] K.U. v. Finland, 02.12.2008, No. 2872/02.
[15] Lipszyc, D. 1999. Droit d'auteur et droits voisins. UNESCO, Paris.
[16] Megadat.com SRL v. Moldova, 08.04.2008, No. 21151/04.
[17] Mincke, W. 1997. Property: assets or power? Objects or relations as substrata of property rights. Property Problems: from Genes to Pension Funds. Ed. by J.W. Harris. Kluwer Law International, 78-80.
[18] Paeffgen GMBH v. Germany, 18.09.2007, No. 25379/04, 21688/05, 21722/05 and 21770/5.
[19] Peck v. the United Kingdom, 28.01.2003, No. 44647/98.
[20] Raustiala, K. 2007. Density and Conflict in International Intellectual Property Law. UC Davis Law Review, 40: 1021-1032.
[21] Rozhkova, M. 2016. ‘Triad’ of intellectual property rights: is the legislative approach correct? The Journal of the IP Court ,11: 14-18. Available at: http://ipcmagazine.ru/legal-issues/triad-of-intellectual-property-rights-if-the-legislative-approach-is-correct (accessed 09/08/2016).
[22] Rozhkova, M., and Afanasiev, D. 2015. The matters of intellectual property in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3): 241-248.
[23] SC Editura Orizonturi SRL v. Romania, 13.05.2008, No. 15872/03.
[24] Shaver, L, and Sganga, C. 2009. The Right to Take Part in Cultural Life: On Copyright and Human Rights. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 27: 637-662.
[25] Smith Kline and French Laboratories Ltd. v. the Netherlands, 04.10.1990, No. 12633/87.
[26] Strowel, A., and Tulkens, F. 2005. Freedom of expression and copyright under civil law: of balance, adaptation, and access. In: Griffiths, J., and Suthersanen, U. (Eds.). Copyright and Free Speech, Comparative and International Analyses, 287-313.
[27] Torremans, P. L. C. (Ed.) 2004. Copyright and Human Rights: Freedom of Expression – Intellectual Property – Privacy, 1.
[28] Yu, P. K. 2007. Reconceptualizing Intellectual Property Interests in a Human Rights Framework. UC Davis Law Review, 40: 1039-1149.
[29] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/UDHRIndex.aspx (accessed 09/08/2016).
[30] WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. WIPO, 2004, reprinted 2008. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/intproperty/489/wipo_pub_489.pdf (accessed 09/08/2016).
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
ROZHKOVA, Marina Alexandrovna. Difficulties of Differentiating between Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights on the Basis of the Case-Law Research Report ‘Internet: Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 5, p. 1136–1141, dec. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/535>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.

Keywords

intellectual property rights; economic rights; moral rights; property; human rights