Form of Implementation of Collective Disputes in the Field of Labor Law

  • Oleksii V. SOLOVIOV Department of Labor Law, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Nataliia M. SHVETS Department of Labor Law, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Iaroslava V. SVICHKAROVA Department of Labor Law, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Nataliia H. ORLOVA Department of Labor Law, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Oleksandr O. DUMA Department of Labor Law, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Labor relations have always been defined as a source of not only increasing of well-being for all parties, but also as a source of the formation of social problematic situations. This was allowed in cases when workers did not receive the level of income they expected and considered fair. In this case, the search for ways to protect the rights of workers, which is considered in the field of labor law, is relevant. The standard sources for the implementation of forms of protection in labor law are strikes and other forms of termination of the work process. The novelty of the paper is determined by the fact that in modern society the forms of protection of labor rights are mainly judicial forms, which guarantee that the employer cannot influence the settlement process by unofficially affecting employees. The article reveals aspects of the design of labor relations that could eliminate the negative impact on the labor process. Aspects of the formation of the branch of labor law are considered, which can provide the maximum number of decisions in the pretrial order. The practical significance of the paper is determined by the possibility of applying methods of solving collective labor disputes as a factor in the formation of the labor law industry with the formation of the principles of sustainable functioning and public control over business.


 

References

[1] Ackers, P. 2020. Industrial relations and the limits of the state: can a left labor government resurrect comprehensive sectoral collective bargaining and restore trade union power? Political Quarterly 91(1): 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12788.
[2] Apitzsch, B. 2013. How personal relations work: Individual market adaptation and collective action in flexible labor markets. Industrielle Beziehungen 20(2): 116–141. https://doi.org/10.1688/1862-0035_IndB_2013_02_Apitzsch.
[3] Armingeon, K. 1991. Towards a European system of labor relations? Journal of Public Policy 11(4): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006334.
[4] Bagdonaitė, A. 2018.Lithuanian labor reform: In search of balance. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labor Studies 7(1). http://www.laborlawresearch.net/news/e-journal-international-and-comparative-labor-studies-volume-7-no-1-january-2018.
[5] Bogg, A. 2017. ’Individualism’ and ‘collectivism’ in collective labor law. Industrial Law Journal 46(1): 72–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww045.
[6] Clark, G.L. 1988. A question of integrity: The National Labor Relations Board, collective bargaining and the relocation of work. Political Geography Quarterly 7(3): 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-9827(88)90013-4.
[7] Cordova, E. 1986. From full-time wage employment to atypical employment: a major shift in the evolution of labor relations? International Labor Review 125(6): 641–657.
[8] Deakin, S. 2012. Labor and employment laws. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199542475-e-14.
[9] Dimitriu, R. 2011. Collective labor conflicts in companies and public institutions: Some prospects. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences (34): 80–97.
[10] Ewing, K.D. 2016. La Unión Europea, los Estados Unidos de América y la AsociaciónTransatlántica para el comercio y la inversión (TTIP): La negociacióncolectiva y la emergente ‘ley transnacional de relacioneslaborales’. Trabajo y Derecho 117: 16–23.
[11] Grime, R.P. 1966. Collective Labor Relations – Judicial Abstention and Intervention. The Modern Law Review 29(2): 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1966.tb01119.x.
[12] Kai, C. 2014. The collective transformation of labor relations and improvement of the government’s labor policy. Social Sciences in China 35(3): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2014.927097.
[13] Kearney, R.C., and Mareschal, P.M. 2017. Labor Relations in the Public Sector. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092157.
[14] Madlala, P.C., and Govender, C.M. 2018.Current collective engagement stakeholder strategies for South African labor relations. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 16: article number a909. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.909.
[15] Martin, E.J. 2003. Labor-management relations, collective bargaining, and the public sector: Collaborative solutions in Alameda, California. Public Administration and Management 8(2): 56–67.
[16] Padron, S.P.G. 2012. Collective bargaining, trade union action and political exchange. A theoretical approach supported by the analysis of labor relations in the shipyards of Cadiz, Spain. Papers 97(4): 773–794.
[17] Qiao, J. 2015. Labor relations regulations and institutions amid slow economic growth, 2012. Chinese Research Perspectives on Society 2: 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004276536_013.
[18] Thirkell, J.E.M., and Tseneva, E.A. 1992. Bulgarian labor relations in transition: tripartism and collective bargaining. International Labor Review 131(3): 355–366.
[19] Tianyu, W. 2016. The institutional construction of collective contracts under the labor contract law: Dilemma and solution. Social Sciences in China 37(1): 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2015.1133510.
[20] Torrence, W.D. 1973. Educating & training management in collective bargaining & labor relations. Hospital Progress 54(5): 78–83.
Published
2020-06-15
How to Cite
SOLOVIOV, Oleksii V. et al. Form of Implementation of Collective Disputes in the Field of Labor Law. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 1423 – 1432, june 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5347>. Date accessed: 09 aug. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.4(50).39.