The Role of International Organizations in Restricting the Use of Humanitarian Intervention for Political Purposes

  • Adel Hamzah OTHMAN Department of Law, Al Farabi University College, Baghdad, Iraq


Humanitarian intervention is often seen as a factor of increasing the level of political presence in one state by another due to its impact on socio-economic processes. Moreover, the presence of the state itself and its government or army is not required. International organizations are used in most cases. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that humanitarian intervention is now understood as an instrument of soft power, coupled with the use of the international community in the context of cross-cutting information. The novelty of the article is determined by the fact that humanitarian intervention is considered not only as an instrument of political influence, but also as a mechanism for participation in the economic environment of society. The paper shows that under the conditions of the distribution of crisis economic phenomena, humanitarian intervention can only aggravate the situation of the state. It was determined that the most effective tool to increase the political rating of other state is the recovery period after emergency situations. The authors show the mechanism for using the mandatory procedures for the restoration of the country using a political instrument from the most financially secure states. The practical significance of the paper is determined by the need to form a mechanism for differentiating the political impact in the process of restoring the state after an emergency.


[1] Bartels, R., and Fortin, K. 2016. Law, justice and a potential security gap: the ‘organization’ requirement in international humanitarian law and international criminal law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 21(1): 29 48.
[2] Ben Hamida, M., Hamdani, S., Limam, W., and Daghfous, M. 2013. Urgences et aide humanitaire en cas de conflit armé. Soins 58(777): 32-33.
[3] Bollettino, V., and Bruderlein, C. 2008. Training humanitarian professionals at a distance: testing the feasibility of distance learning with humanitarian professionals. Distance Education 29(3): 269-287.
[4] Bouchet-Saulnier, F. 2014. Consent to humanitarian access: an obligation triggered by territorial control, not States’ rights. International Review of the Red Cross 96(893): 207-217.
[5] Criminal justice reform in post-conflict States. A guide for practitioners. 2011. United States Institute of Peace.
[6] Dijkzeul, D., and Moke, M. 2005. Public communication strategies of international humanitarian organizations. International Review of the Red Cross 87(860): 673-691.
[7] Dube, N., der Vaart, T., Teunter, R.H., and Van Wassenhove, L.N. 2016. Host government impact on the logistics performance of international humanitarian organizations. Journal of Operations Management 47 48 (1): 44-57.
[8] ECOSOC Decision 2002/304. Ad Hoc Advisory Group on Guinea-Bissau. 2002.
[9] ECOSOC Decision 2003/311. Ad Hoc Advisory Group on Burundi. 2003.
[10] Gonçalves, P., and Moshtari, M. 2016. Collaborative initiatives among international actors within a humanitarian setting. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations 16(4): 346-361.
[11] Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons. Implementing the ‘Pinheiro Principles’. 2007.
[12] Kunz, N., and Reiner, G. 2016. Drivers of government restrictions on humanitarian supply chains: an exploratory study. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 6(3): 329-351.
[13] La Rosa, A.-M. 2006. Humanitarian organizations and international criminal tribunals, or trying to square the circle. International Review of the Red Cross 88: 169-186.
[14] Mackintosh, K. 2007. Beyond the Red Cross: the protection of independent humanitarian organizations and their staff in international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross 89(865): 113-130.
[15] Mele, V., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., and Varone, F. 2016. Conflicts of interest in international organizations: evidence from two united nations humanitarian agencies. Public Administration 94(2): 490-508.
[16] Mills, K. 2005. Neo-humanitarianism: the role of international humanitarian norms and organizations in contemporary conflict. Global Governance 11(2): 161-183.
[17] Pedraza Martinez, A.J., Stapleton, O., and Van Wassenhove, L.N. 2011. Field vehicle fleet management in humanitarian operations: a case-based approach. Journal of Operations Management 29(5): 404-421.
[18] Puett, C. 2019. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions within a humanitarian organization. Disasters 43(3): 575-590.
[19] Security Council Resolution 1674 on Protection of civilians in armed conflict. 2006.
[20] The 1951 Refugee Convention and Protocol. 1967.
[21] Truth, Justice and Reparations. Establishing an Effective Truth Commissions. 2007. Amnesty International.
[22] Turrini, L., Besiou, M., Papies, D., and Meissner, J. 2019. The role of operational expenditures and misalignments in fundraising for international humanitarian aid. Journal of Operations Management 66(4): 379 417.
[23] UN Security Council Resolution 1593. 2005.
[24] UN Security Council Resolution 1970. 2011.
[25] Veuthey, M. 2004. The respective roles of international organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in humanitarian action. Refugee Survey Quarterly 23(4): 236-237.
[26] Wagner, S.M., and Thakur-Weigold, B. 2018. Supporting collaboration in humanitarian supply chains-insights from a design science project. Production Planning and Control 29(14): 1130-1144.
[27] Wang, F., Leng, Q., and Wei, J. 2019. Evaluation on natural disaster relief efficiency of international humanitarian organizations. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China 49(5): 412-421.
[28] Wei, J., Wang, A., and Wang, F. 2019. Humanitarian organizations in international disaster relief: understanding the linkage between donors and recipient countries. Voluntas 30(6): 1212-1228.
[29] Weissbrodt, D. 1987. Humanitarian law in armed conflict: the role of international nongovernmental organizations. Journal of Peace Research 24(3): 297-306.
How to Cite
OTHMAN, Adel Hamzah. The Role of International Organizations in Restricting the Use of Humanitarian Intervention for Political Purposes. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 1287-1295, june 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 27 may 2024. doi: