Best Practice Principles for Business Incubators: A Comparison between South Africa and the Netherlands
Abstract
Many researchers and industry leaders have identified business incubators as an alternative method to develop entrepreneurship and support small businesses. Incubators facilitate the success of a large number of start-ups and firms who, in turn, add value and growth to the economy. Eight factors that could influence the performance and success of incubators were identified in the literature. These factors include aspects such as management, infrastructure, networks and partnerships, mentoring, skills development and funding. The study followed a qualitative approach. Six incubator managers from South Africa (a developing country) and the Netherlands (a developed country) respectively, were interviewed to determine their views on factors for success. Incubators for small business development have been used for decades in the Netherlands but this process has only recently been introduced in South Africa. Despite this historical difference, incubator managers agree on most aspects, especially regarding the importance of networking, structured management, mentorship and training at incubators. The focus and funding factors of the incubators differed between the two countries. The implications of the research are that incubator managers from both countries could learn from each other and this research could be utilized to assess incubators in both developed and developing countries.References
[2] Ambrish, D.R. 2014. Entrepreneurship development: An approach to economic empowerment of women. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 01(6): 224-232.
[3] Bergek, A., and Norrman, C. 2008. Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1-2): 20-28.
[4] Bøllingtoft, A., and Ulhøi, J.P. 2005. The networked business incubator-leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 265-290.
[5] Campbell, C. 1988. Change agents in the new economy: Business incubators and economic development. Minneapolis, MN: Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.
[6] Czarniewski, S. 2016. Small and medium-sized enterprises in the context of innovation and entrepreneurship in the economy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(1): 30-39.
[7] Hannon, P.D., and Chaplin, P. 2003. Are incubators good for business? Understanding incubation practice – the challenges for policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21: 861-881.
[8] Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W., and Smit, B. 2004. Finding Your Way in Qualitative Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
[9] Lalkaka, R. 2001. ‘Best Practice’ on business incubation: Lessons (yet to be) learned. International conference on business centres: Actors for economic and social development. Brussels, 14-15 November 2001.
[10] Middleton, M., Schaeffer, P.V., and Jackson, R.W. 2012. An analysis of administrative ‘best practice’ in the administration of business incubators. Virginia: Regional Research Institute.
[11] Ospina, S. 2004. Qualitative research. In G. Goethals, G. Sorenson and J. MacGregor Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Leadership (pp. 1279-1284). London: Sage.
[12] Pereira, A.G., Pedrosa, T., Simon, K.H., and Matovelle, A. 2013. In-depth interviews. Available at: www.ivm.vu.nl Accessed on 2013/06/03.
[13] Phillips, R.G. 2002. Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24: 299-316.
[14] Potkány M., Stasiak-Betlejewska R., Kováč R., and Gejdoš M. 2016. Outsourcing in conditions of SMEs-The potential for cost savings. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(1): 145-156.
[15] Sivvam, M. 2012. Women entrepreneurship: An Indian perspective. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert.
[16] Stokan, E., Thompson, L., and Mahu, R.J. 2015. Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4): 317-327.
[17] Wynarczyk, P., and Raine, A. 2005. The performance of business incubators and their potential development in the North East Region of England. Local Economy, 20(2): 205-220.
Keywords
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.