The Main Directions and Priorities of the Unified Transport Policy in the EAEU

  • Eldar V. TUMANOV Department of Economic Theory and Management, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Asiya A. SPEKTOR Department of Economic Theory and Management, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Julia V. PANKO Department of Economic Theory and Management, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Tamara M. STEPANYAN Department of Economic Theory and Management, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Mikhail S. KOMOV Department of Economic Theory and Management, Russian University of Transport, Moscow, Russian Federation

Abstract

Study of the main directions and priorities of the unified transport policy of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEC). The methodological basis for the study of the problem was the methods of system analysis and synthesis, logic, comparison, systematization, generalization, economic and statistical methods of analysis and data processing, which allowed a comprehensive study of the processes of transport integration of the EAEU.


The analysis of Russian and foreign scientific sources on the place and role of transport, transport system, transport policy in the improvement of global economic relations of regional economic associations. Focuses on the practice of the EEC and the EAEC. The key determinants on which the process of formation and development of a single transport space within several countries depends, as well as barriers to this process, are outlined. The analysis of the effectiveness of the implementation of the initiative to conduct a unified transport policy of the Eurasian Economic Union, formulated the main problems and obstacles that may subsequently have a negative impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of the tasks and priorities of the Eurasian coordinated (harmonized) transport policy. Recommendations to reduce and eliminate this negative impact are proposed.


 

References

[1] Abunimah, A. 2010. Quartet ex-envoy’s investment helps Israel greenwash settlements. The Electronic Intifada. Available at: https://electronicintifada.net/content/quartet-ex-envoys-investment-helps-israel-greenwash-settlements/8805
[2] Amirbekova, A., Madiyarova, D., and Andronova, I. 2017. What are the pros and cons for Kazakhstan of joining the WTO from an export potential point of view? Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 11(3): 85-92.
[3] Baboshkina, A.A., Savina, N.P., and Morozov, I.V. 2018. Management processes in the development of the socio-economic environment of the region. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume IX, Spring, 2(32): 376-385. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v92(32).02
[4] Goloshchapova, L.V., et al. 2018. Analytical review of risks of loss of profits in cargo transportation. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(11): 1897-1902.
[5] Guiliano, A.A., Kochergina, T.E., and Mozoleva, N.V. 2015. International integration processes: Innovative, investment and infrastructural aspects. Russian Customs Academy.
[6] Heiets, I., Spivakovskyy, S., and Spivakovska, T. 2019. Innovative business models for full cycle operating airlines. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 20(4): 356-377.
[7] Hesse, M., and Rodrigue, J.P. 2003. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(3): 171-184.
[8] Kochetov, Y., Sokolova, I., Amirgaliyeva, S., and Amirgaliyeva, Z. 2016. Alternating heuristic and exact method for the leader-follower facility location and design problem. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronics Computer and Computation, ICECCO 2015, 27-30 September 2015, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
[9] Kossymbayeva, S., Atkociuniene, V., Nukesheva, A., and Balkibayeva, A. 2019. Peculiarities of rural social infrastructure management. Research for Rural Development, 2: 139-145.
[10] Kovalev, M.M., Koroleva, A.A., and Dutina, A.A. 2017. Transport logistics in Belarus: State, prospects. BSU Publishing Center.
[11] Kudriyarov, S. 2019. Chance not to know the country. Transport infrastructure: Projects and dreams. http://press.rzd.ru
[12] Lakshmanan, T.R., and Anderson, W.P. 2002. Transportation Infrastructure, Freight Services Sector and Economic Growth. Freight Transportation: Improvements and the Economy. Available at: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/improve_econ/appb.htm
[13] Lomakin, V.K. 2019. The world economy: A textbook for university students studying in economic specialties and areas. YUNITI-DANA Publishing.
[14] Mantusov, V.B. 2017. World economy and international economic relations. YUNITI-DANA Publishing.
[15] Moschovou, T.P., and Giannopoulos, G.A. 2012. Modeling Freight Mode Choice in Greece. Transport Research Arena, 48: 597-611.
[16] Mustafin, A., and Kantarbayeva, A. 2018. Supply chain modeled as a metabolic pathway. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 28(3): 473-491.
[17] Rudenko, M.N., and Hochradel, R. 2017. Assessing the impact of the competency level on the success of companies' integration. Economy of Region, 13(1): 106-113.
[18] Shipkova, O.T., and Prorokova, O.A. 2009. World Economy. RCTU named after D.I. Mendeleev.
[19] Slater, R.E. 2009. International transport: forward to global economy. Transport for a Global Economy Challenges and Opportunities in the Downturn. Materials of the International Transport Forum, May 27-29, Leipzig, Germany.
[20] Vinokurov, E. 2017. On the Silk Road Economic Belt. Official site of the Eurasian Development Bank. Available at: https://eabr.org
[21] JSC ‘UTLC ERA’ maintains positive dynamics in traffic volumes. 2019. Available at: https://www.utlc.com
[22] Cargo turnover in the EAEU for 6 years increased by 16%. 2017. Available at: https://eurasia.expert
[23] Certain provisions of the draft decision of the Government of Armenia do not correspond to current realities. 2018. Available at: https://news.am
[24] Decision of the Interstate Council of the Eurasian Economic Community ‘On the Concept for the Formation of a Single Transport Space of the Eurasian Economic Community’ (Adopted in Moscow on January 25, 2008) No. 374 from the International Law Information Bank. 2008. Available at: http://www.eurasian commission.org/ru/Documents/
[25] ECE outlines areas for harmonization of air traffic rules. 2018. Official website of the Eurasian Economic Commission. Available at: http://www.eurasiancommission.org
[26] Statistical Yearbook of the Eurasian Economic Commission ‘Eurasian Economic Union in Figures’. 2018. Available at: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/econstat/Documents/Brief _Statistics_Yearbook_2018.pdf
[27] Statistics of the Eurasian Economic Union. 2019. Official website of the Eurasian Economic Commission. Available at: http://www.eurasiancommission.org
[28] The government hopes to increase export of transport services by one and a half times. 2018. Available at: https://ria.ru
[29] Transport in the Eurasian Economic Union. 2015. EAEU. Available at: http://eurasian-movement.ru
[30] Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union. 2014. http://www.consultant.ru/ document/cons_doc_LAW_163855/
Published
2019-12-30
How to Cite
TUMANOV, Eldar V. et al. The Main Directions and Priorities of the Unified Transport Policy in the EAEU. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 8, p. 2556 – 2565, dec. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5302>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.8(46).34.