Legal Principles of Interference with Private Communication in the Process of Counterintelligence

  • Serhiy S. KUDINOV Educational and Research Institute of Counterintelligence National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Juliana O. NAIDON Educational and Research Institute of Counterintelligence National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oleg S. PELIUKH Educational and Research Institute of Counterintelligence National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Nadiia O. ARTIUKHOVA Educational and Research Institute of Counterintelligence National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.8(46).17

Abstract

Counterintelligence is a special type of activity aimed at ensuring national security. The Ukrainian legislation regulates the rights of the authorized subjects of this activity in relation to intelligence, terrorist and other unlawful attacks of the special services of foreign states, including organizations, individual groups and persons that may adversely affect the national security of Ukraine. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of interference in private communication during counterintelligence activities and to to private communication develop strategies for solving them, to explore the legal principles of interference with privacy, and in particular in the process of such activities. The results of the study will contribute to the development of the theory of national security, that is, to develop a procedure for intelligence and counterintelligence units to gain access to information transmitted between individuals in the process of direct communication or communication through connectivity.


 

References

[1] Burnham, V. 1999. Introduction to the Law and the US Legal System. Ukraina.
[2] Busel, V.T. (Ed.). 2009. The Great Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian. Perun Publishing and Trading Company.
[3] Fulei, T.I. 2013. Application of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights in Administrative Justice. VAITE.
[4] Kolesnyk, V.A. 2014. Interference with private communication and protection of the rights of the individual while conducting covert investigation procedures. The Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine 3(31): 37-44.
[5] Lukyanchikov, E.D., and Lukyanchikov, B.E. 2014. Improving the system of covert investigation procedures. Problematic issues of using the criminal procedure code of Ukraine in modern conditions: Round table materials, April 4, in Kyiv, Ukraine.
[6] Malyarenko, V.T. 1999. The Constitutional Principles of Criminal Justice. Yurinkom Inter.
[7] Mikheienko, M.M., Nor, V.T., and Shibiko, V.P. 1999. The Criminal Process of Ukraine. Lybid.
[8] Mukhin, V., and Shtanko, A. 2014. State interference with private communication: Procedural aspects. Journal of the National Prosecution Academy of Ukraine, 1: 90-97.
[9] Pegarkov, D.D. (Ed.). 2006. National Security Issues. Nova Publishers.
[10] Shylo, O.G. 2011. Theoretical and Applied Bases of Realization of the Constitutional Right of the Person and the Citizen for Judicial Protection in Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Criminal Process of Ukraine. Pravo.
[11] Tertyshnik, V.M. (Ed.). 2003b. Criminal Procedure Law of Ukraine. A.S.K.
[12] Tertyshnik, V.M. 2013a. Conceptual problems of criminal justice reform. Law and Society, 1: 136-140.
[13] Westin, A.F. 1968. Privacy and freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review, 25: 166. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol25/iss1/20
[14] American Convention on Human Rights, November 22, 1969. Available at: http://www.cidh.org/ Basicos/English/Basic3.American%20Convention.htm
[15] Case of Calogero Diana v. Italy. 1996. European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#_ftn1
[16] Case of James and Others v. the United Kingdom. 1986. Judgment of 2 August 1984. Series A. No. 82. Para 84. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57507%22]}
[17] Case of Matanović v. Croatia. 2017. European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://hudoc.echr. coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-172466%22]}
[18] Case of Mykhailuk and Petrov v. Ukraine (Statement No. 11932/02). 2010. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15.01.2010. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_500
[19] Case of Petra v. Romania. 1998. Judgment of 23 September 1998. Available at: https://menschenrechte. ac.at/orig/98_5/Petra.pdf
[20] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000. 2000. https://zakon0.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/994_524
[21] Constitution of Ukraine: adopted at the fifth session of the VerkhovnaRada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996. Available at:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80
[22] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004/ed19900101
[23] De Wilde, Oovs and Versyp v Belgium. 1971. European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/980_161
[24] Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Public Law 95-511; 92 Stat. 1783; approved October 25, 1978. 1978. Available at: https://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Foreign%20Intelligence%20Surveillance%20Act %20Of%201978.pdf
[25] Golder v. United Kingdom. 1975. European Court of Human Rights. Judgment. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/980_086
[26] H.R. 2048. USA Freedom Act of 2015. Available at:https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2048?q=%7B’search’%3A%5B’USA+Freedom+Act’%5D%7D
[27] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. Available at: https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/995_043
[28] Law of Ukraine ‘On Counterintelligence Operations’ dated 03.04.2003. 2003. No. 12. Art. 89. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/374-15
[29] Law of Ukraine ‘On Law Enforcement Intelligence Operations’ of 18.02.1992. 1992. No. 22. Art. 303. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2135-12/ed20170412
[30] Law of Ukraine ‘On Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols Nos. 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention’. 1997. No. 40. Art. 263. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-%D0%B2%D1%80
[31] Resolution 1466. 2005. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe ‘On Ukraine's Responsibilities and Obligations’. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/ru/994_611
[32] Resolution 428. 1970. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly on the Declaration on Mass Media and Human Rights. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_107
[33] The case of Klass and Others v. Germany. 1978. Application no. 5029/71. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57510%22]}
[34] The case of Kruslin v. France. 1990. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. (Application no. 11801/85). Available at: https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/4548/file/ECHR_CASE%20OF%20 KRUSLIN%20v.%20FRANCE_24.04.1990_en.pdf
[35] The case of Ludi v Switzerland. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15.06.1992. 1992. Available at: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SO0653.html
[36] The case of Volokha v. Ukraine (statement No. 23542/02). 2006. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 2 November 2006. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_138
[37] The Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. 2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17/ed20120413
[38] The USA PATRIOT Act: Preserving Life and Liberty (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism). 2001. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20100102035036/http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
[39] United States of America v. Harold Nicholson, Defendant. 1997. Criminal No. 96-448-A. Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/955/588/1515762/
[40] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted and proclaimed in General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948. 1948. No. 93. Art. 3103. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/995_015
Published
2019-12-30
How to Cite
KUDINOV, Serhiy S. et al. Legal Principles of Interference with Private Communication in the Process of Counterintelligence. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 8, p. 2382 – 2393, dec. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5285>. Date accessed: 22 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.8(46).17.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 10 No 8 (2019): JARLE Volume X Issue 8(46) Winter 2019
Section
Articles

The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.