From Communist Regime to Liberal Democracy: The Evolution of the Legal System in Lithuania
Abstract
The article analyses the mechanism of the establishment and maintenance of liberal democracy in Lithuania. This is a political and legal process where politicians have to obey the requirements of constitutionalism consciously. The research considers the periodization of the evolution of the legal system in the Republic of Lithuania: from this approach three periods of the development of the relationship between constitutional law and politics are distinguished: (1) the period of priority of politics over constitutional law; (2) the period of the priority of constitutional law over politics and (3) the period of the maintenance of constitutional law as the methodological basis of political-legal thinking in the political life of the state, the period of the maintenance of constitutional law as the methodological basis of political-legal thinking in the political life of the state (since 2004), period coincides with the entry of the Republic of Lithuania to the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The legislation that does not meet the requirements of constitutionalism can be reported not only to the Constitutional Court, but also to the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. This period reflects the tendency that the state’s politicians seek to obey the values and norms of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania deliberately. It was concluded that the principle of legal continuity is observed regarding the institutional formation of the legal system of Lithuania.References
[1] Aidukaite, J. 2014. Transformation of the welfare state in Lithuania: towards globalization and Europeanization. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(1): 59-69.
[2] Bamowe, J.Т., King, G.J., and Bemiker, E. 1992. Personal values and economic transition in the Baltics states. Journal of Baltic Studies, 23(2): 179-190.
[3] Basora, A. 2013. Can the post-communist democracies survive a continuation of the Euro-crisis? Orbis, 57(2): 217-231.
[4] Bielasiak, J., and Hulsey, J.W. 2013. Party system determinants of electoral reform in post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(1): 1-12.
[5] Bunce, V. 2008. The tasks of democratic transition and transferability. Orbis, 52(1): 25-40.
[6] Clark, T.D., and Pranevičiūte, J. 2008. Perspectives on communist successor parties: the case of Lithuania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(4): 443-464.
[7] Crowther, W.E., and Matonyte, I. 2007. Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer: Estonia, Lithuania and Moldova compared. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(3): 281-299.
[8] Fidrmuc, J. 2003. Economic reform, democracy and growth during post-communist transition. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3): 583-604.
[9] Gaidys, V. 1998. Attitudes towards the economic system in the Baltic States: past, present, future. Cultural Encounters in East Central Europe: 61-73.
[10] Galbreath, D., Lašas, A., and Lamoreaux, J.W. 2008. Continuity and Change in the Baltic Sea Region. Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi,
[11] Grennes, T. 1997. The economic transition in the Baltic countries. Journal of Baltic Studies, 28(1): 9-24.
[12] Hayek, F.A. 1999. Laisvosios Visuomenės Politinė Tvarka (T3), Teisė, Istatymų Leidyba ir Laisvė. Vilnius: Eugrimas/ALK.
[13] Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Redwood City: CA Stanford University Press,
[14] Hidcn, J., and Salmon, P. 1994. The Baltic Nations and Europe. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. London-New York.
[15] Ishiyama, J.T. 1993. Founding elections and the development of transitional parties: the cases of Estonia and Latvia, 1990–1992. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 26(3): 277-299.
[16] Johnston, H. 1992. Religion and nationalist subcultures in the Baltics. Journal of Baltic Studies, 23(2): 133-148.
[17] Jurkynas, M. 2009. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2008. Electoral Studies, 28(2): 329-333.
[18] Jurkynas, M. 2012. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2012. Electoral Studies, 34: 334-338.
[19] Jurkynas, M. 2014. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2012. Electoral Studies, 34: 334-338.
[20] Krickus, R. 1993. Lithuania: nationalism in the modem era. In: Nations and Politics in the Soviet successor states. Ed. by Bremmer, l. and Tares, R. Cambridge,
[21] Kūris, E. 1993. Teisinė valstybė, teisinių sistemų įvairovė ir Vakarų teisės tradicija. In: Glendon, M.A., Gordon, M.W., Osakwe, C. Vakarų Teisės Tradicijos. Vilnius: Pradai,
[22] Lehti, M. 2007. Protégé or go-between? The role of the Baltic States after 9/11 in EU-US Relations. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(2): 127-151.
[23] Lewis-Beck, M.S, and Bélanger, E. 2012. Election forecasting in neglected democracies: an introduction. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(4): 767-768.
[24] Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo įstatymas. 1993. Official Gazette, No. 6-120.
[25] Lietuvos Teisinės Institucijos. Ed by Kūris, E. Vilnius: VĮ Registrų centras, 2011.
[26] Lieven, A. 1993. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. New Haven; London: Yale univ. press,
[27] Lühiste, K. 2006. Explaining trust in political institutions: some illustrations from the Baltic States. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(4): 475-496.
[28] Mikulskiene, B., and Pitrenaite-Zileniene, B. 2013. Management of participation practice: reconstruction of Lithuania's formal policy networks by means of social network analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79: 127-140.
[29] Nefas, S., Valickas, A., and Pilkauskaite-Valickiene, R. 2015. Capacity building of parliamentarians: problems and perspectives in Lithuania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191: 402-406.
[30] Podgaiskyte, V. 2014. Waste management sector value changes in Lithuania along the last decade. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110: 512-519.
[31] Schambeckas, H. 2009. Apie demokratijos sąvoką, idėją, istoriją ir raidą Europoje. In: Teisė ir Demokratija. Demokratija Lietuvoje: tarp Vakarų ir Rytų (1990-2007). Ed. By A. Vaišvila. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas,
[32] Sekliuckienė, J. 2014. Changes of emerging Central and Eastern European countries business conditions: case of Lithuania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156: 350-354.
[33] Semenova, E., Edinger, M., and Best, H. 2013. Parliamentary Elites in Central and Eastern Europe: Recruitment and Representation. London, New York: Routledge,
[34] Senn, A.E. 1997. Lithuania: rights and responsibilities of independence. In: New States, New Politics. Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge,
[35] Sinkevičius, V. 2010. Kovo 11-oji: nepriklausomybės atkūrimo teisinė konstrukcija. Jurisprudencija, 3(121): 55-71.
[36] Šlapkauskas, V. 2006. Teisinės sistemos disfunkcija - silpnos socialinės politikos požymis. Socialinis Darbas 5(1): 21-29.
[37] Smith, D.J. 2013. The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. New York
[38] Smith-Siversten, H. 1997. Towards parties of elites - or popularism? Revue Baltique, 8: 19-37.
[39] Steen, A. 1996. Consolidation and competence: research on the politics of recruiting political elites in the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 27(2): 143-156.
[40] Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania Act on the Re-establishment of the State of Lithuania (1990). http://lrkt.lt/en/legal-information/lithuanias-independence-acts/act-of-11-march/366 (accessed 05/08/2016).
[41] Vardys, V.S. 1991. Sajudis: national revolution in Lithuania. In: Toward Independence. The Baltic Popular Movements. Ed. by Jan A. Trapans. Westview Press,
[42] Vebra, R. 1994. Political rebirth in Lithuania 1990-1991: events and problems. Journal of Baltic Studies, 25(2): 183-188.
[43] Zielonka, J., and Pravda, A. 2001. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford University Press.
[44] Žilys, J. 2008. Česlovas Juršėnas: parlamentaras demokratinėje visuomenėje. In: Parlamentas ir valstybinės valdžios institucijų sąranga. Liber Amicorum Česlovui Juršėnui. Ed. By G. MesonisVilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
[2] Bamowe, J.Т., King, G.J., and Bemiker, E. 1992. Personal values and economic transition in the Baltics states. Journal of Baltic Studies, 23(2): 179-190.
[3] Basora, A. 2013. Can the post-communist democracies survive a continuation of the Euro-crisis? Orbis, 57(2): 217-231.
[4] Bielasiak, J., and Hulsey, J.W. 2013. Party system determinants of electoral reform in post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46(1): 1-12.
[5] Bunce, V. 2008. The tasks of democratic transition and transferability. Orbis, 52(1): 25-40.
[6] Clark, T.D., and Pranevičiūte, J. 2008. Perspectives on communist successor parties: the case of Lithuania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(4): 443-464.
[7] Crowther, W.E., and Matonyte, I. 2007. Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer: Estonia, Lithuania and Moldova compared. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(3): 281-299.
[8] Fidrmuc, J. 2003. Economic reform, democracy and growth during post-communist transition. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3): 583-604.
[9] Gaidys, V. 1998. Attitudes towards the economic system in the Baltic States: past, present, future. Cultural Encounters in East Central Europe: 61-73.
[10] Galbreath, D., Lašas, A., and Lamoreaux, J.W. 2008. Continuity and Change in the Baltic Sea Region. Amsterdam - New York: Rodopi,
[11] Grennes, T. 1997. The economic transition in the Baltic countries. Journal of Baltic Studies, 28(1): 9-24.
[12] Hayek, F.A. 1999. Laisvosios Visuomenės Politinė Tvarka (T3), Teisė, Istatymų Leidyba ir Laisvė. Vilnius: Eugrimas/ALK.
[13] Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Redwood City: CA Stanford University Press,
[14] Hidcn, J., and Salmon, P. 1994. The Baltic Nations and Europe. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. London-New York.
[15] Ishiyama, J.T. 1993. Founding elections and the development of transitional parties: the cases of Estonia and Latvia, 1990–1992. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 26(3): 277-299.
[16] Johnston, H. 1992. Religion and nationalist subcultures in the Baltics. Journal of Baltic Studies, 23(2): 133-148.
[17] Jurkynas, M. 2009. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2008. Electoral Studies, 28(2): 329-333.
[18] Jurkynas, M. 2012. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2012. Electoral Studies, 34: 334-338.
[19] Jurkynas, M. 2014. The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2012. Electoral Studies, 34: 334-338.
[20] Krickus, R. 1993. Lithuania: nationalism in the modem era. In: Nations and Politics in the Soviet successor states. Ed. by Bremmer, l. and Tares, R. Cambridge,
[21] Kūris, E. 1993. Teisinė valstybė, teisinių sistemų įvairovė ir Vakarų teisės tradicija. In: Glendon, M.A., Gordon, M.W., Osakwe, C. Vakarų Teisės Tradicijos. Vilnius: Pradai,
[22] Lehti, M. 2007. Protégé or go-between? The role of the Baltic States after 9/11 in EU-US Relations. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(2): 127-151.
[23] Lewis-Beck, M.S, and Bélanger, E. 2012. Election forecasting in neglected democracies: an introduction. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(4): 767-768.
[24] Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo įstatymas. 1993. Official Gazette, No. 6-120.
[25] Lietuvos Teisinės Institucijos. Ed by Kūris, E. Vilnius: VĮ Registrų centras, 2011.
[26] Lieven, A. 1993. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. New Haven; London: Yale univ. press,
[27] Lühiste, K. 2006. Explaining trust in political institutions: some illustrations from the Baltic States. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(4): 475-496.
[28] Mikulskiene, B., and Pitrenaite-Zileniene, B. 2013. Management of participation practice: reconstruction of Lithuania's formal policy networks by means of social network analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79: 127-140.
[29] Nefas, S., Valickas, A., and Pilkauskaite-Valickiene, R. 2015. Capacity building of parliamentarians: problems and perspectives in Lithuania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191: 402-406.
[30] Podgaiskyte, V. 2014. Waste management sector value changes in Lithuania along the last decade. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110: 512-519.
[31] Schambeckas, H. 2009. Apie demokratijos sąvoką, idėją, istoriją ir raidą Europoje. In: Teisė ir Demokratija. Demokratija Lietuvoje: tarp Vakarų ir Rytų (1990-2007). Ed. By A. Vaišvila. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas,
[32] Sekliuckienė, J. 2014. Changes of emerging Central and Eastern European countries business conditions: case of Lithuania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156: 350-354.
[33] Semenova, E., Edinger, M., and Best, H. 2013. Parliamentary Elites in Central and Eastern Europe: Recruitment and Representation. London, New York: Routledge,
[34] Senn, A.E. 1997. Lithuania: rights and responsibilities of independence. In: New States, New Politics. Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge,
[35] Sinkevičius, V. 2010. Kovo 11-oji: nepriklausomybės atkūrimo teisinė konstrukcija. Jurisprudencija, 3(121): 55-71.
[36] Šlapkauskas, V. 2006. Teisinės sistemos disfunkcija - silpnos socialinės politikos požymis. Socialinis Darbas 5(1): 21-29.
[37] Smith, D.J. 2013. The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. New York
[38] Smith-Siversten, H. 1997. Towards parties of elites - or popularism? Revue Baltique, 8: 19-37.
[39] Steen, A. 1996. Consolidation and competence: research on the politics of recruiting political elites in the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 27(2): 143-156.
[40] Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania Act on the Re-establishment of the State of Lithuania (1990). http://lrkt.lt/en/legal-information/lithuanias-independence-acts/act-of-11-march/366 (accessed 05/08/2016).
[41] Vardys, V.S. 1991. Sajudis: national revolution in Lithuania. In: Toward Independence. The Baltic Popular Movements. Ed. by Jan A. Trapans. Westview Press,
[42] Vebra, R. 1994. Political rebirth in Lithuania 1990-1991: events and problems. Journal of Baltic Studies, 25(2): 183-188.
[43] Zielonka, J., and Pravda, A. 2001. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford University Press.
[44] Žilys, J. 2008. Česlovas Juršėnas: parlamentaras demokratinėje visuomenėje. In: Parlamentas ir valstybinės valdžios institucijų sąranga. Liber Amicorum Česlovui Juršėnui. Ed. By G. MesonisVilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
DEMENKO, Olga Ivanivna et al.
From Communist Regime to Liberal Democracy: The Evolution of the Legal System in Lithuania.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 5, p. 1014–1025, dec. 2016.
ISSN 2068-696X.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/522>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2024.
Section
Articles
Keywords
legal system; codification; reception; Constitutional Law; Parliament
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.