Authorization of the Barring Order by the Investigating Judge: Problems of Legislative Regulation

  • Aidar BAKYT Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

The article considers the issues of functioning in the criminal justice process of modern Kazakhstan of the institution of judicial control over pre-trial investigation. The study objective is to identify the problems of legislative regulation of the procedure for the use by the investigating judge of procedural coercion in the form of a barring order. As part of the study, the author provides key approaches to defining the essence of judicial control over pre-trial investigation, defines the procedural status of the investigating judge and classifies his/her powers. The analysis of the current procedure for the use of a barring order as a coercive measure has allowed to develop specific approaches to the implementation of competent law enforcement, as well as proposals to improve the existing legislative procedures to address cases of undue restrictions on the rights of an individual in criminal proceedings.

References

[1] Abrosimova, E.B. 1991. The Judiciary: Constitutional and Legal Aspects. Abstract of PhD Thesis. Moscow. Institute of State and Law.
[2] Azarov, V.A., and Tarichko. I. Y. 2004. The Function of Judicial Control in the History, Theory and Practice of the Criminal Procedure in Russia. Omsk: Omsk State University.
[3] Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014, July 04. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000231.
[4] Golovko, L.V. 2001. The Reform of the Criminal Procedure in France. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 8: 89-98.
[5] Golovko, L.V. 2002. A new Edition of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the Context of Comparative Criminal Procedure Law. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 5: 52-53.
[6] General Laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 209A. N. d. Available at: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartII/TitleIII/Chapter209A.
[7] Guskova, A.P. 2002. Legal Procedural and Organizational Matters of the Preparation for the Court Hearing in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. Orenburg: IPK OSU.
[8] Gutsenko, K.F., and Kovalev, M. A. 1998. Law Enforcement Agencies. Moscow: Mirror.
[9] Kovtun, N.N. 2002. Judicial Control in the Criminal Trial in Russia. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Law Academy.
[10] Kudabaev, B. 2015. The Role of the Investigating Judge in Ensuring a Balance between the Prosecution and Defense. Available at: http://kst.sud.kz/rus/content/rol-sledstvennogo-sudi-v-obespechenii-balansa-mezhdu-obvineniem-i-zashchitoy-predsedatel.
[11] Maslikov, I.S. 1997. The Judiciary in the State Mechanism of the Russian Federation. Abstract of PhD Thesis. Moscow. Problems Institute strengthening the rule of law at the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation.
[12] Rzhevskiy, V.A., and Chepurnova, N. M. 1998. Judicial Authority in the Russian Federation: Constitutional Foundations of the Organization and Activities. Moscow: Yurist.
[13] Skitovich, V.V. 1997. The Judiciary as a Systemic Institution. Pravovedenie, 1: 147-155.
[14] The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 1995, August 30. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K950001000_.
[15] Vereshchynskaya, N.A. 2013. Institute of Investigating Judges in the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Rossiyskiy vestnik obshchestvennogo kontrol, 3. Available at: http://zagr.org/1390.html.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
BAKYT, Aidar. Authorization of the Barring Order by the Investigating Judge: Problems of Legislative Regulation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 5, p. 989–994, dec. 2016. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/519>. Date accessed: 14 apr. 2024.

Keywords

criminal procedure; judicial control; investigating judge; barring order; restraining order; protective order