Authorization of the Barring Order by the Investigating Judge: Problems of Legislative Regulation
Abstract
The article considers the issues of functioning in the criminal justice process of modern Kazakhstan of the institution of judicial control over pre-trial investigation. The study objective is to identify the problems of legislative regulation of the procedure for the use by the investigating judge of procedural coercion in the form of a barring order. As part of the study, the author provides key approaches to defining the essence of judicial control over pre-trial investigation, defines the procedural status of the investigating judge and classifies his/her powers. The analysis of the current procedure for the use of a barring order as a coercive measure has allowed to develop specific approaches to the implementation of competent law enforcement, as well as proposals to improve the existing legislative procedures to address cases of undue restrictions on the rights of an individual in criminal proceedings.References
[2] Azarov, V.A., and Tarichko. I. Y. 2004. The Function of Judicial Control in the History, Theory and Practice of the Criminal Procedure in Russia. Omsk: Omsk State University.
[3] Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014, July 04. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000231.
[4] Golovko, L.V. 2001. The Reform of the Criminal Procedure in France. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 8: 89-98.
[5] Golovko, L.V. 2002. A new Edition of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the Context of Comparative Criminal Procedure Law. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 5: 52-53.
[6] General Laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 209A. N. d. Available at: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartII/TitleIII/Chapter209A.
[7] Guskova, A.P. 2002. Legal Procedural and Organizational Matters of the Preparation for the Court Hearing in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. Orenburg: IPK OSU.
[8] Gutsenko, K.F., and Kovalev, M. A. 1998. Law Enforcement Agencies. Moscow: Mirror.
[9] Kovtun, N.N. 2002. Judicial Control in the Criminal Trial in Russia. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Law Academy.
[10] Kudabaev, B. 2015. The Role of the Investigating Judge in Ensuring a Balance between the Prosecution and Defense. Available at: http://kst.sud.kz/rus/content/rol-sledstvennogo-sudi-v-obespechenii-balansa-mezhdu-obvineniem-i-zashchitoy-predsedatel.
[11] Maslikov, I.S. 1997. The Judiciary in the State Mechanism of the Russian Federation. Abstract of PhD Thesis. Moscow. Problems Institute strengthening the rule of law at the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation.
[12] Rzhevskiy, V.A., and Chepurnova, N. M. 1998. Judicial Authority in the Russian Federation: Constitutional Foundations of the Organization and Activities. Moscow: Yurist.
[13] Skitovich, V.V. 1997. The Judiciary as a Systemic Institution. Pravovedenie, 1: 147-155.
[14] The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 1995, August 30. Available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K950001000_.
[15] Vereshchynskaya, N.A. 2013. Institute of Investigating Judges in the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Rossiyskiy vestnik obshchestvennogo kontrol, 3. Available at: http://zagr.org/1390.html.
Keywords
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.