Website as an e-Commerce Tool: Regulatory Technology

  • Andrey Vladimirovich RYZHIK Belarusian State Agricultural Academy, Gorki, Belarus
  • Vladimir Lvovich SLESAREV Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Russian Federation
  • Vitalij Anatolevich MALCEV Academy of Labor and Social Relations, Russian Federation
  • Vladimir Pavlovich KAMISHANSKY Kuban State Agrarian University, Russian Federation

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the legal nature and regulation features of the website, which is the main tool of electronic commerce. There are various definitions of the concept of website that reflect the legal nature of the definition in question, depending on the circumstances of its use. It has been established that a website refers to a set of electronic documents (files), united under one address (domain name and (or) IP address). The authors come to the conclusion that, depending on the business model used by the subject of electronic commerce, websites can have both an informational and advertising character and contain the functionality of online stores, accepting and processing orders for goods and services online and, in many cases, performing them as well. With a certain degree of conventionality, one can say that in modern conditions the website acts as a representative of the person on the Internet. Therefore, the very first stage of its use — the stage of creating a website — is particularly important.

References

[1] Basmanova, E.S. 2010. Internet-sait kak obekt imushchestvennykh prav [The website as an object of property rights]. Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [a dissertation of a candidate in legal sciences], Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow.
[2] Bliznets, I. and Robinov, A. 2002. Pravovoi status gipertekstovykh dokumentov i tselesoobraznost ikh registratsii v Rospatente [The legal status of hypertext documents and the expediency of their registration with Rospatent]. Intellektualnaya sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 7: 2-6.
[3] Bonner, A.T. 2013. Traditsionnye i netraditsionnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [The traditional and non-traditional means of evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings]. Moscow: Prospekt.
[4] Klosek J. 2003. The Legal Guide to E-Business. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut and London, 10.
[5] Lenkovskaya, R.R. et al. 2019. Technology of Concluding Contracts via the Internet. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6): 4598-4602. DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F8890.088619.
[6] Lindgaard, G. et al. 2006. Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 MiHiseconds to Make a Good First Impression! Behavior & Information Technology, 25(2): 115-126.
[7] Naser, A.A. et al. 2018. Intellectual property in Russia: the correlation of private and public elements. Revista Espacios, 39(41): 9.
[8] Petrovsky, S. 2001. Zashchita prav avtora saita [Protection of the rights of the website author]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 1: 63-64.
[9] Reshetnikova, I.V., Semenova, A.V. and Caregorodceva, E.A. 2006. Kommentarii sudebnykh oshibok v praktike primeneniya APK RF [Commentary of judicial errors in the practice of applying the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Norma.
[10] Savelyev, A.I. 2016. Elektronnaya kommertsiya v Rossii i za rubezhom: pravovoe regulirovanie [E-commerce in Russia and abroad: the legal regulation]. Moscow: Statut.
[11] Sergo, A. 2004. Neopredelennyi sait [An undefined website]. EZh-Yurist 1.
[12] Sitdikova, L.B. and Starodumova, S.J. 2019a. Cloud Technology Services in the Information Security. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8): 3209-3211.
[13] Sitdikova, L.B. and Starodumova, S.J. 2019b. Innovative Digital Rights in Corporate Relations. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6): 5176-5179. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.F9104/088619.
[14] Starodumova, S.J. et al. 2018. The Problems of Responsibility for Violation of Legislation Regulating the Information Security on the Internet. Revista Espacios, 39(45): 25.
[15] Turkin, M.M. et al. 2019. The Mechanism of Classifying Intellectual Property Offenses as Economic Offenses. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3): 6094-6097. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.C5646.098319.
[16] Yuzefovich, V.B. 2012. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie v arbitrazhnom protsesse: analiz pravoprimenitelnoi praktiki. Vyvody sudebnogo yurista [Evidence and proof in the arbitration process: an analysis of law enforcement practice. Conclusions of the judicial lawyer]. Moscow: Infotropik Media.
*** Trebovaniya o zashchite informatsii, soderzhashcheisya v informatsionnykh sistemakh obshchego polzovaniya, utv. Prikazom FSB Rossii i FSTEK ot 31 avgusta 2010 g. No. 416/489, p. 17. [Requirements for the protection of information contained in public information systems, approved by order of the FSB of Russia and the FSTEC No. 416/489 dated August 31, 2010, clause 17].
Published
2020-06-15
How to Cite
RYZHIK, Andrey Vladimirovich et al. Website as an e-Commerce Tool: Regulatory Technology. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 1032 – 1038, june 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5187>. Date accessed: 02 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).37.