Copyright Law Protection Competence in Paying Royalty as Exclusive Rights Substance

  • Evita Isretno ISRAHADI Faculty of Law, Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Copyright is considered as a moving and intangible object; therefore, a copyright devolution cannot be done verbally but must be with an authentic deed or Underhand deed. Problem Identification: 1. How does the song copyright devolution mechanism make economic interest for a composer or Copyright Holder? 2. What is the system of song copyright royalty payment in Indonesia? and 3. What should be done by the parties to resolve the royalty payment execution dispute? It is a normative juridical method that must be used. Research Result: It is true that copyright license mechanism, fee retaining or royalty payment is considered as logic consequences that must be done by a licensee over a licenser (Copyright holder). It is because the licensee gets material profits due to the economic rights exploitation over the copyright itself.  There are many varieties or different ways of compensation payment system or indemnification from the licensee to the licenser over one copyright object to another, for instance in song/music is known two different ways such as royalty and flat systems, while in music or song is known several ways, namely by percentage system, period system, profit sharing system,  compensation or  copyright selling system. Royalty payment dispute resolving may come in many ways, and, generally, the dispute resolving forums are available into two forms, such as litigation forum through courts and non-litigation forum out of court.

References

[1] Abbott, F. et al. 1999. The International Intellectual Property System; Commentary and Materials, Part One, Klutver Law International.
[2] Aquinas, T. 1972. Summa Theologica, Introduction in Jurisprudence 3th ed, Praeger Publisher.
[3] Aquinas, T. The End of Man: Summa Contra Gentiles, 3rd Book, New York: The Moddrn Library.
[4] Aquinas, T. The Summa Theologica: On the Essence of Law, New York: The Modem Library.
[5] Bentham, J. and Friedmann, W. 1967. Legal Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.
[6] Butterton, G.R. 1997. Norma and Property in the Middle Kingdom, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 15(2).
[7] Curzon, L.B. 1993. Jurisprudence, London: Cavendish Publishing Limited.
[8] Darmodiharjo, D. dan S. 1996. Penjabaran Nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
[9] Djumhana, M. dan R. D. 2003. Hak Milik Intelektual, Sejarah, Teori, dan Prakteknya di Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[10] Fletcher, G.P. 1946. Basic Concepts of Legal Thought, Oxford University Press.
[11] Hampstead, L. 1972. Introduction to Jurisprudence, Curzon, Jurisprudence, Preager Publisher.
[12] Hutagalung, S.M. 1994. Hak Cipta (Kedudukan dan Peranannya di Dalam Pembangunan), Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
[13] Jung, C. 2003. The Politics of Indigenous Identity; Neoliberalism, Cultural Rights, and the Mexican Zapatista, Social Research: An International Quarterly of the Social Sciences, 70(2).
[14] Kesowo, B. 1998. Pengantar Umum Mengenai Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Pengantar Umum Mengenai Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI), Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[15] Lauer, R.H. 1993. Perspektif tentang Perubahan Sosial, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[16] Margono, S. dan A.A. 2002. Komersialisasi Aset Intelektual: Aspek Hukum Bisnis, Jakarta: Grasindo.
[17] McKeough, J. and Stewart, A. 1997. Intellectual Property in Australia, Butterworths.
[18] Quraisy. 2004. Usman, Rachmadi, Hukum Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni.
[19] Ramli, A. 2000. Hak atas Kepemilikan Intelektual: Teori Dasar Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
[20] Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice, The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
[21] Richardson, B.J. 2001. Indigenous Peoples, International Law and Sustainability, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
[22] Saidin, O.K. 2006. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights), Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[23] Satjipto, R. 2003. Sisi-sisi Lain Dari Hukum di Indonesia, Kompas, 55.
[24] Satjipto, R., Hukum, I. and Bandung. 1996. Citra Aditya Bakti.
[25] Simanjuntak, W. 2000. Perlindungan Hak Cipta di Indonesia, Tangerang: Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektua.
[26] Simorangkir, J.C.T. 1982. Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1982 tentang Hak Cipta, Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.
[27] Subekti. 2002. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan XVI, Jakarta: Pradya Paramita.
[28] Sumaryono, E. 2002. Etika Hukum Relevansi Hukum Kodrat Thomas Aquines, Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
[29] Sutedi, A. 2009. Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[30] Suyud, M. 2010. Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia: Teori dan Analisis Harmonisasi Ketentuan World Trade Organization/WTO-TRIPs Agreement, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
[31] Syafrinaldi. 2006. Hukum Tentang Perlindungan Hak Milik Intelektual Dalam Menghadapi Era Globalisasi, Pekanbaru, Uir Press.
[32] Syarifin, P. and Jubaedah, D. Peraturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia, Bandung: Pustaka Bani.
[33] Tebbit, M. 2004. Philosophy of Law: An introduction, Routledge.
[34] Wu, A.O. 2000. Surpassing the Material: The Human Rights Implications of Informed Consent in Bio prospecting Cells Derived from’ Indigenous People Groups, Washington University Law Quarterly, 78.
[35] Yayasan. 2015. Karya Cipta Indonesia, Pedoman Singkat Untuk Anggota, Jakarta: YKCI.
*** Civil Law Regulation
*** Copyright Short Course by Asian Law Group Pty Ltd.
*** Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. 2006. Buku Panduan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Tangerang: Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan ECAP II.
*** http://www.asiamaya.com/Konsultasihuk um/haki/lingkup_haki.htm
*** http://www.cumicumi.com/news/read/19334/anang-syahrini conflict about royalty sharing, 03-05-2011.
*** http://www.hukumonline.com
*** https://andasiallagan92.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/ right over intellectual welfareintelektualhaki/,
*** https://cindypuspitasarii.wordpress.com/2015/05/04 Intellectual Welfare Infringement in Indonesia.
*** Indonesia Australia Specialized Training Project Phase II, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Copyright Short Course, 2000. Universal Declaration of Human Rights
*** Indonesia Specialized Training Project Phase II, Intellectual Welfare Right
*** Law Number 19 Year 2002 about Copyright.
*** Law Number 28 Year 2014 about Copyright.
*** Law Number 6 Year 1982 about Copyright.
*** Law Number 7 Year 1987 about Copyright.
Published
2020-06-15
How to Cite
ISRAHADI, Evita Isretno. Copyright Law Protection Competence in Paying Royalty as Exclusive Rights Substance. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 863 – 869, june 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5170>. Date accessed: 02 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).20.