Obligation to Prove Appearer Document Authenticity as Deelneming Claim Exception
Abstract
Notary is a public official who provides legal services to the public. Notary's Authorities are regulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 on Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on Position of Notary. Based on data of Directorate of General Criminal Investigation Metro Jaya in 2014 and 2017, the number of Notaries who were placed as suspects and witnesses of criminal acts and falsification were increased. It was because of the absence of obligation to prove appearer document authenticity as contained in Supreme Court Decree Number 702 K/Sip/1973, September 5, 1973. The research was sociological normative by testing the truth of deelneming criminal exception with secondary data, supported by primary data in the form of interviews, using non-random purposive sampling. Theory of lesser evil made Notary is excluded from deelneming claim in Article 55 of Criminal Code on documents falsification, as long as the Public Notary applies 2015 Law and Ethics Code, and ignores Supreme Court Decree Number 702 K/Sip/1973, September 5, 1973. Further, he continues to conduct his duties within a standard operating procedure for himself and related agencies when proving the documents in the form of minutes. Therefore, this exception principle in falsification is given conditionally. It applies to Notary if he can prove that he has conducted an act to prove appearer documents).
References
[2] Adjie, H. 2014. Merajut Pemikiran dalam Dunia Notaris & PPAT,Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
[3] Budianto, A. and Utama, G.I. 2010. Aspek Jasa Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Prespektif Perlindungan Pasien, Bandung: KPD Bandung.
[4] Kanter. 2002. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
[5] Kusumaatmadja, M. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Suatu Penganalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum Buku I, Bandung: Alumni.
[6] Lamintang. 2014. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[7] Multazam, M.T. and Purwaningsih, S.B. 2018. Verlijden Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia (Bukti di Sidoarjo), (1), Res Judicata, 19, 22.
[8] Prajitno, A.A. 2013. Pengetahuan Praktis tentang Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia ? Second edition, Malang: Selaras.
[9] Prodjidokoro, W. 2012. Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia, Ed. 3, Cet-4 Bandung: Refika Aditama.
[10] Prodjodikoro, W. 1989. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Seventh edition, Bandung: Refika.
[11] Remmelink, J. 2014. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Materiil I: Prolegomena dan Uraian Tentang Teori – Ajaran Dasar, Jogjakarta: Maharsa.
[12] Santoso, T. and Zulfa, E.A. Hukum Pidana Materiil & Formil, Kumpulan Pengajar Hukum Pidana, published USAID, The Asia Foundation and Kemitraan Partnership.
[13] Setiawan, A. 2017. Analisis Yuridis Standar Prosedur Pelayanan Operasional (SPPOP) Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta terkait Klausul Proteksi Diri Notaris berdasarkan Pasal 15 ayat (1) Undang-Undang nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Akta, 4(1), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
[14] Sjaifurrachman dan Adjie, H. 2011. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, , Bandung: Mandar Maju.
[15] Soekanto, S. 2012. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
[16] Sugiarto, U.S. 2015. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia , Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.
*** Disampaikan oleh Bapak Gultom, Kepala Unit Penyidikan Polda Metrojaya, Jakarta pada tanggal 26 Oktober 2019.
*** Disampaikan oleh Dwi Susanto, Penyidik Pembantu di Polda Metrojaya, pada tanggal 26 Oktober 2018.
*** https://kbbi.web.id/serta-2
*** Interview dengan Iptu Isnanto, di Direktorat Kriminal Umum Polda Metro Jaya, pada tanggal 23 Agustus 2019.
*** Kode Etik Notaris yang dilaksanakan di Banten, pada tanggal 29-31 Mei 2015.
*** Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 3036/PID.B/2009/PN. Mdn, tanggal 4 Januari 2010.
*** Pengadilan Tinggi Medan Nomor 82/PID/2010/PT-MDN, tanggal 25 Februari 2010.
*** Penjelasan disampaikan oleh AKBP Yanuar Prayoga, Kasubbid Bankum, Bidang Hukum Polda Jabar, pada tanggal 10 Juni 2019.
*** Putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 1099 K/PID/2010, tanggal 21 Juni 2010.
*** Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 702 K/Sip/1973, tanggal 5 September 1973.
*** Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya nomor 273/1970 Perdata, tanggal 21 Mei 1971.
*** Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya nomor 29/1973 Perdata, tangal 24 Februari 1973.
*** Wawancara dengan Ibu Afriyanti Latuconsina, Notaris Kota Tangerang Selatan pada tanggal 10 Juli 2017.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.