Evaluation of Defense Region Arrangement Policy in Region Space Order Plan of Bandung City, Indonesia

  • Wibisono POESPITOHADI Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia Peace and Security Complex (IPSC), Bogor, Indonesia
  • Marsono MARSONO Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia Peace and Security Complex (IPSC), Bogor, Indonesia
  • Khaerudin KHAERUDIN Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia Peace and Security Complex (IPSC), Bogor, Indonesia

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution, article 27 paragraph (3) and article 30 paragraph (1) mandates every citizen about the rights and obligations of every Indonesian citizen in the defense and security efforts of the state. State defense efforts are carried out in a universal defense system involving all citizens. In addition, the arrangement of defense areas throughout the Republic of Indonesia is based on Government Regulation Number 68 of 2014 concerning the Arrangement of National Defense Areas starting from the provincial level to the district/city level. One of them is in the city of Bandung. The implementation of the defense area arrangement is carried out in an integrated manner with the regional spatial plan. But its implementation in the city of Bandung has not been fully integrated. For this reason, research or evaluation of this policy is carried out. The research problem is about the initial conditions (antecedent), the implementation process (transaction), and the achievement results (outcomes) of the defense area arrangement policy in the Bandung City Spatial Plan. The aim of the research is to evaluate the policies at these three stages. This study uses a qualitative method with Stake's Countenance Model. The results of the study show: (1) the initial condition of the defense area arrangement in the Bandung City Spatial Plan has been based on Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning and has been synergized, but not maximal yet; (2) the policy implementation process has been implemented, but not maximal ye; and (3) the results of the achievement of policies in the form of a Defense Area Plan have been realized and a the Defense Area Detail Plan has not been realized and has not been used as a reference in the preparation of the Bandung City Spatial Plan. The conclusion that the defense area arrangement policy in the Bandung City Spatial Plan was 57.7% in the moderate/moderate category.


 

References

[1] Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy. Understanding Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35699-3.
[2] Contandriopoulos, D., and Brousselle, A. 2012. Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011430371.
[3] Fitzpatrick, J.L. 2011. Program evaluation alternative approaches and practical guidelines (No. 379.154097 F5).
[4] Hill, M., and Varone, F. 2016. The Public Policy Process. The Public Policy Process. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693965.
[5] Johnson, R.T., Hutto, G.T., Simpson, J.R., and Montgomery, D.C. 2012. Designed Experiments for the Defense Community. Quality Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.627288.
[6] Lasker, R.D., Weiss, E.S., and Miller, R. 2001. Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage. Milbank Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00203.
[7] Stewart, Jr, Hedge, D.M. and Lester, J.P. 2007. Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Nelson Education.
[8] Marlina, E., et al. 2014. Arranging Advertisement as a Communication Media of Society towards the Enhancement of Urban Visual Quality.Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series, v. 8582, 81-94, Springer, Cham.
[9] Marlina, E., et al. 2014b. Advertising Arrangements: An Attempt in Improving the Visual Quality of Urban Areas. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 2(4), 16-27.
[10] Marlina, E., Ronald, A., Ghazali, R., and Herawan, T. 2014c. Spatial Control of Post-earthquake Market Based on Paseduluran. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 8582, 95-108, Springer, Cham.
[11] Osman, M. 2004. An Evaluation of Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196730.
[12] Stake, R.E. 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
[13] Stoner, J.F., and Freeman, R.E. 1999. Management in Marketing and Strategy Planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[14] Stufflebeam, D. 2001. Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.3.
[15] Veal, A.J. 2017. Public Policy Making. In Leisure, Sport and Tourism, Politics, Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780648033.0119.
[16] Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American planning association, 68(3), 297-314.
[17] Wallis, A.B. 2008. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.22.2692.
[18] Yates, D.J., Girish, J., Gulati, J., and Williams, C.B. 2017. Understanding the Impact of Politication Structure, Governance, and Public Policy on E-Government. In Social Inclusion and Usability of ICT-Enabled Services. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677316.
Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
POESPITOHADI, Wibisono; MARSONO, Marsono; KHAERUDIN, Khaerudin. Evaluation of Defense Region Arrangement Policy in Region Space Order Plan of Bandung City, Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 532 – 543, mar. 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5121>. Date accessed: 25 feb. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.2(48).25.