Evaluation of Defense Region Arrangement Policy in Region Space Order Plan of Bandung City, Indonesia
Abstract
The 1945 Constitution, article 27 paragraph (3) and article 30 paragraph (1) mandates every citizen about the rights and obligations of every Indonesian citizen in the defense and security efforts of the state. State defense efforts are carried out in a universal defense system involving all citizens. In addition, the arrangement of defense areas throughout the Republic of Indonesia is based on Government Regulation Number 68 of 2014 concerning the Arrangement of National Defense Areas starting from the provincial level to the district/city level. One of them is in the city of Bandung. The implementation of the defense area arrangement is carried out in an integrated manner with the regional spatial plan. But its implementation in the city of Bandung has not been fully integrated. For this reason, research or evaluation of this policy is carried out. The research problem is about the initial conditions (antecedent), the implementation process (transaction), and the achievement results (outcomes) of the defense area arrangement policy in the Bandung City Spatial Plan. The aim of the research is to evaluate the policies at these three stages. This study uses a qualitative method with Stake's Countenance Model. The results of the study show: (1) the initial condition of the defense area arrangement in the Bandung City Spatial Plan has been based on Law Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning and has been synergized, but not maximal yet; (2) the policy implementation process has been implemented, but not maximal ye; and (3) the results of the achievement of policies in the form of a Defense Area Plan have been realized and a the Defense Area Detail Plan has not been realized and has not been used as a reference in the preparation of the Bandung City Spatial Plan. The conclusion that the defense area arrangement policy in the Bandung City Spatial Plan was 57.7% in the moderate/moderate category.
References
[2] Contandriopoulos, D., and Brousselle, A. 2012. Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011430371.
[3] Fitzpatrick, J.L. 2011. Program evaluation alternative approaches and practical guidelines (No. 379.154097 F5).
[4] Hill, M., and Varone, F. 2016. The Public Policy Process. The Public Policy Process. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693965.
[5] Johnson, R.T., Hutto, G.T., Simpson, J.R., and Montgomery, D.C. 2012. Designed Experiments for the Defense Community. Quality Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.627288.
[6] Lasker, R.D., Weiss, E.S., and Miller, R. 2001. Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage. Milbank Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00203.
[7] Stewart, Jr, Hedge, D.M. and Lester, J.P. 2007. Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Nelson Education.
[8] Marlina, E., et al. 2014. Arranging Advertisement as a Communication Media of Society towards the Enhancement of Urban Visual Quality.Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series, v. 8582, 81-94, Springer, Cham.
[9] Marlina, E., et al. 2014b. Advertising Arrangements: An Attempt in Improving the Visual Quality of Urban Areas. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 2(4), 16-27.
[10] Marlina, E., Ronald, A., Ghazali, R., and Herawan, T. 2014c. Spatial Control of Post-earthquake Market Based on Paseduluran. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 8582, 95-108, Springer, Cham.
[11] Osman, M. 2004. An Evaluation of Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196730.
[12] Stake, R.E. 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
[13] Stoner, J.F., and Freeman, R.E. 1999. Management in Marketing and Strategy Planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[14] Stufflebeam, D. 2001. Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.3.
[15] Veal, A.J. 2017. Public Policy Making. In Leisure, Sport and Tourism, Politics, Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780648033.0119.
[16] Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American planning association, 68(3), 297-314.
[17] Wallis, A.B. 2008. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.22.2692.
[18] Yates, D.J., Girish, J., Gulati, J., and Williams, C.B. 2017. Understanding the Impact of Politication Structure, Governance, and Public Policy on E-Government. In Social Inclusion and Usability of ICT-Enabled Services. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677316.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.