The Accelerating Public Service Policy: A Study of the Preconditions of Integrated Administrative Service of Subdistrict (PATEN) in Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the preconditions, as well as to provide an overview, of the acceleration of integrated administrative service of subdistrict in Karangpawitan Subdistrict, Garut District, West Java, Indonesia. This study is a descriptive study using qualitative approach. The data are collected using interview and document study. The respondents are determined using purposive sampling technique as informants and key persons. The data are then analyzed using qualitative data analysis through reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The findings show that the preconditions of PATEN in Karangpawitan Subdistrict, Garut District, are not fully prepared. If observed from the substantive and technical requirements, the acceleration of PATEN is prepared, but from administrative requirements, it is unprepared because there is no Regulation of Regent, stipulating the service standards and job descriptions of the subdistrict personnel for the implementation of PATEN. The efforts to be carried out by the government of Karangpawitan Subdistrict in order to accelerate PATEN in Karangpawitan Subdistrict, Garut District are: (1) Implementing PATEN with full commitment in accordance with the authority delegated by the Regent to the Head of Subdistrict; (2) Developing and utilizing information technology with computerized system to facilitate access to public service; (3) Maximizing the performance of the Technical Team of PATEN in establishing cooperation and coordination with related Regional Working Unit (SKPD) to complete the implementation requirements of PATEN; (4) Providing information and socialization about PATEN to the public in order to increase public awareness to manage licensing and non-licensing services in Subdistrict; (5) Changing the mindset of subdistrict officials by promoting public demand for the quality of public services provided; (6) Applying reward and punishment to support bureaucratic reform in public service; (7) Capacity building of human resources (SDM) of subdistrict apparatus in conducting qualified public service.
References
[2] Fernandes, A.A.R., and Fresly, J.2017. Modeling of Role of Public Leader, Open Government Information and Public Service Performance in Indonesia. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0322.
[3] Henderson, A., Țiclău, T., and Balica, D. 2018. Perceptions of Discretion in Street-Level Public Service: Examining Administrative Governance in Romania. Public Performance and Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400987.
[4] Hinrichs, U., Carpendale, S., Knudsen, S., and Thudt, A. 2017. Analyzing Qualitative Data. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, ISS 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132272.3135087.
[5] Homberg, F., and Vogel, R. 2016. Human Resource Management (HRM) and Public Service Motivation (PSM). International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-05-2016-0120.
[6] Jacob, D.W., et al. 2016. An application of rough set theory for clustering performance expectancy of Indonesian e-government dataset. In International Conference on Soft Computing and Data Mining, 638-646. Springer, Cham.
[7] Jacob, D.W., Fudzee, M.F.M., Salamat, M.A., and Herawan, T., 2019. A review of the generic end-user adoption of e-government services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(4), 799-818.
[8] Johnston, M.P. 2014. Secondary Data Analysis : A Method of Which the Time Has Come. Qualitatve and Quantative Methods in Libraryes (QQML).
[9] Kjeldsen, A.M., and Hansen, J.R. 2018. Sector Differences in the Public Service Motivation–Job Satisfaction Relationship: Exploring the Role of Organizational Characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16631605.
[10] Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., and Paçin, Y.2017. Adoption of E-Government Services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior 66: 168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041.
[11] Lallmahomed, M.Z.I., Lallmahomed, N., and Lallmahomed, G.M. 2017. Factors Influencing the Adoption of E-Government Services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003.
[12] Lewis, B.D. 2018. Local Government Form in Indonesia: Tax, Expenditure, and Efficiency Effects. Studies in Comparative International Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9236-z.
[13] Management, Performance. 2019. International Journal Od Productivity and Performance Management. International Journal Od Productivity and Performance Management.
[14] Maxwell, J.A., and Reybold, L.E.2015. Qualitative Research. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10558-6.
[15] Michelucci, F.V., and De Marco, A. 2017. Smart Communities inside Local Governments: A Pie in the Sky?’ International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2016-0059.
[16] Moleong, L.J. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). In PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
[17] Naumenko, R. 2018. Philosophy of Public Governance: Manpower Policy of Modern Ukraine in the Context of Globalization. Philosophy and Cosmology. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/20/9.
[18] Newman, J., Cherney, A., and Head, B.W.2017. Policy Capacity and Evidence-Based Policy in the Public Service. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1148191.
[19] Pangrazio, L. 2017. Exploring Provocation as a Research Method in the Social Sciences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1161346.
[20] Rogge, K., and Reichardt, K.2016. Going Beyond Instrument Interactions: Towards a More Comprehensive Policy Mix Conceptualization for Environmental Technological Change. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2743225.
[21] Simons, A., and Voß, J.P. 2018. The Concept of Instrument Constituencies: Accounting for Dynamics and Practices of Knowing Governance. Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1375248.
[22] Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., and Krimmer, R. 2017.’Open Data as Enabler of Public Service Co-Creation: Exploring the Drivers and Barriers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.12.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.