The Concept of Privacy and Protection of its Inviolability in the Criminal Policy of the Kazakhstan Republic
Abstract
The presented article deals with the issues related to the implementation of the criminal policy of the Kazakhstan Republic concerning the privacy of a person. Ensuring the right of privacy of criminal law means provides a solution to such issues as the definition of the private life of a person, a legal restriction or interference in the private (personal) life of man, the criminalization of illegal collection or dissemination of information about the private life of a person and sentence guilty of the correct qualification of the offense. The author studies the concept of privacy, the history of its development, its theoretical rationale, the legislation of the Kazakhstan Republic, which regulates its protection, the opinions of researchers on the imperfection of legal norms. The author draws the conclusion of insufficient legislative development of the concept of privacy required for improving the structure of the Art. 147 of the Criminal Code of the Kazakhstan Republic, recognizes the disbalance between the right to privacy of an individual and the information interests of the society, suggests the solutions to these problems. The absence of a specific law on the protection of privacy, according to the author, cannot effectively protect the right of every person to respect for his private life.References
[2] Divayeva, I.R. 2004. Criminal Law Protection of the Right to Privacy of a Person in Russia. PhD thesis. Ufa.
[3] Kadnikov, B.N. 2008. Criminal Law Protection of the Citizens' Constitutional Right to Privacy. PhD Thesis. Moscow
[4] Kadnikov, B.N. 2011. Criminal Law Protection of Privacy. М.: Jurisprudence Publishing House.
[5] Kanafin, D. K. 2009. Review of the Draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan ‘On Introducing Amendments and Additions to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Protection of the Citizen's Rights to Privacy’. The Right to Privacy in the Kazakhstan Republic; The Collection of Papers of the Experts' Meeting – Astana.
[6] Karpovich, V.D. 2002. Article-by-Article Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Moscow
[7] Krasikov, A.N. 1996. Criminal Law Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of a Person in Russia. Saratov.
[8] Kuzhukeyeva, G. The Right to Privacy and the Right to Freedom of Expression: the Balance Problems. Retrieved from www.medialawca.org/node/4318/.
[9] Leibo, Y.I., Tolstopyatenko, G.P. and Eckstein, K.A. 2000. The Rights and Freedoms of a Person and a Citizen. Moscow
[10] Makeyev, P.N. 2006. Criminal Liability for Invasion of Privacy. PhD Thesis. Moscow
[11] Petrukhin, I.L. 1989. Privacy: the Limits of Interference. Moscow
[12] Pikurov, N.I. 2003. Some Issues of the Criminal Law Protection of Privacy. Criminal Law Protection of a Person and Its Optimization. Research-to-Practice Conference in Honour of Professor Krasikov A.N. (March 20-21, 2003).
[13] Polivanova, D. Today's Evolution of the Right to Privacy. Retrieved from www.law-n-life.ru/arch/131/131-8.doc/.
[14] Romanovsky, G.B. 1997. Constitutional Regulation of the Right to Privacy. PhD Thesis. St. Petersburg.
[15] Sapargaliyev, G.S. 2004. The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Legal Research Commentary. Almaty City.
[16] The Criminal Code No. 167-I of the Kazakhstan Republic. Retrieved July 16, 1997 from www.online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1008032#sub_id=1420000/.
[17] The Criminal Code No. 226-V of the Kazakhstan Republic. Retrieved July 3, 2014 from www.online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575252#sub_id=1470000/.
[18] The Criminal Procedure Code No. 231-V of the Kazakhstan Republic. Retrieved July 4, 2014 from www.online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852#pos=13;-274&sel_link=1004101030/.
[19] Toby Mendel. Freedom of Expression and the Right to Privacy. Retrieved from www.unesco.kz/cgi-bin/library?e=d-000-00-0ATACI-00-0-0-0prompt-10-4-0-1l-1-en-50-20-about-00031-001-1-0utfZz-8-00&a=d&cl=CL2.1&d=HASH6bd6842e750cbdd7d603cb.6/.
[20] Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4: 193- 220.
[21] Westin, A.F. 1968. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Athenaeum.
Keywords
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.