Legal Implication of Ownership in Common in Roman Private Law and Its Reception by European Jurisdictions
Abstract
The scientific article deals with the formation of the structure of ownership in common in Roman private law and its further reception by European jurisdictions. It explores the way the imperfect regulations that treated ownership in common as an inevitable exception in the pre-classical period of Roman law evolved into an entirely different approach in its classical period, whereby the key principles of the legal regulations on ownership in common were eventually implemented by the jurisdictions of most European countries. The wide recognition of the norms of Roman private law, which included regulations on ownership in common, affirms the universal character of the structures regulations and structures, which were developed in ancient Rome. These features are also applicable to the concept of ownership in common developed in Roman law.
References
[2] Dodonov, R., Aleksandrova, O., Dodonova, V. 2019. Rusin history in the creative legacy of Vladimir Vernadsky. Rusin 56: 92-109.
[3] Dozhdev, D.R. 1997. Roman Private Law.Nauka.
[4] Filatova, U.B. 2010. Tenancy in common institute in Soviet civil law. Russian Justice 11: 14-16.
[5] Filatova, U.B. 2012a. Individualistic Approach to the Ownership in Common Regulation: History and Modern Times. In: A.V. Ragulina, and M.S. Shayhullina (Eds.), Advanced Topics of Improving Legislation and Law Enforcement: Records of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference, 157-159. Eurasian Scientific Research Institute of Law Issues.
[6] Filatova, U.B. 2012b. Tenancy in common: approaches to its legal regulation in some European legislations. In: A.V. Malko, V.M. Shafirov, and A.V. Ussa (Eds.), Legal Policy and Development of Russian Legislation in the Context of Modernization: A Collection of Reports, 497-505. Siberian Federal University.
[7] Flach, D., Flach, A. 2004. Das Zwölftafelgesetz. Leges XII Tabularum. Darmstad.
[8] Gaius.1935. Institutiones. Leipzig.
[9] Garcia Garrido, M.K. 2005. Roman Private Law: Cases, Lawsuits, Institutions. Statut.
[10] Karmaza, O.O., et al. 2019. Civil law contract: Doctrinal and legal approaches. Asia Life Sciences 21(2): 821-836.
[11] Karmaza, O.O., et al. 2018. The protection of civil rights and interests in the court. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(8): 2622-2630.
[12] Kaser, M. 1971. Das RomischePrivatrecht. ErsterAbschnitt. Munchen.
[13] Kostruba, A.V. 2017. Occurrence of resolutive condition of a deed as a juridical fact in civil law of Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 8(3): 857-864.
[14] Kostruba, A.V. 2018. Legal regulatory mechanism of social relations for ensuring dynamics in civil relationship. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(5): 1689-1695.
[15] Kostruba, A.V. 2019. The notion and attributes of right – terminating legal facts. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 10(1): 254-262.
[16] Kurmanov, N., Yeleussov, A., Aliyev, U., and Tolysbayev, B. 2015. Developing effective educational strategies in Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6(5): 54. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p54 13.
[17] Muromtsev, S. 2003. Civil Law of Ancient Rome. Statut.
[18] Novitsky, I.B., and Peretersky, I.S. 1996. Roman Private Law. Yurist.
[19] Pak, A.B. 2010. The Roman law influence on the construction of a valid civil code in Kazakhstan. In: M.K. Suleimenov (Ed.), Subject, Method and System of Civil Law: Records of the International Scientific and Practical Conference as Part of the Annual Civil Readings during the ‘Germany in Kazakhstan 2010’ Year, 84-87. KazHLU Research Institute of Private Law.
[20] Pokrovsky, I.A. 1911. History of Roman Law. Law.
[21] Pokrovsky, I.A. 2003. The Main Issues of Civil Law. Statute.
[22] Romanovskaya, V.B., and Kurzenin, E.B. 2000. The Foundations of Roman Private Law. Nizhny Novgorod.
[23] Rudenko, M.N. 2018. Mechanisms for development and realization of economic capacity of the regional population from the perspective of sociocultural approach. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(2): 645-663.
[24] Saidov, A.K. 2006. Comparative Legal Studies. Norma.
[25] Shershenevich, G.F. 2001. Civil Law Course. Autograph.
[26] Skripilev, E.A. 1984. Digesta Justiniana: Selected Excerpts. Nauka.
[27] Suleimenov, M.K. 2018. The System of Law and the System of Legislation of Kazakhstan: the Choice of the Path. http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31102841#pos=36;-20.
[28] Tatsiy, V., Serohina, S. 2018. Bicameralism: European tendencies and perspectives for Ukraine. Baltic Journal of European Studies 8(1): 101-122.
[29] Yeleussov, A., Kurmanov, N, and Tolysbayev, B. 2015. Education quality assurance strategy in Kazakhstan. Actual Problems of Economics 2: 142-150.
[30] Zom, R. 1910. Institutions. Textbook on the History and the System of Roman Civil Law. Warehouse Edition in N.K. Martynov’s Bookstore.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.