ECtHR Practice of Resolving Disputes on Royalty Taxation for the Use of Copyright Objects

  • Daria SUKHANOVA Department of State-Legal Disciplines, Odessa Institute of Internal Affairs, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Siuzanna TSURKANU Department of International Law and Comparative Law, International Humanitarian University, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Ruslan ENNAN Department of Intellectual Property Law and Corporate Law, National University ‘Odesa Law Academy’, Odessa, Ukraine
  • Olha BALATSKA Departments of Civil-Legal Disciplines, I. Malynovskyi Institute of Law, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Ukraine
  • Lesia STRELBITSKA Departments of State-Legal Disciplines, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.7(45).24

Abstract

The European Court of Human Rights is increasingly focusing on the compatibility of tax law and intellectual property law with European standards of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers. To increase the efficiency of the work of the bodies of the State Tax Service of Ukraine, as well as the judicial authorities of Ukraine and to ensure an adequate level of protection of the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities, it is important to analyze the ECtHR's practice of resolving royalties for the use of copyright objects. The research methodology consists of general theoretical and special scientific methods, namely: dialectical, historical, systemic, modeling and abstraction, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, comparative-legal method, and theoretical modeling. The study analyzes the ECtHR's practice of the settlement of disputes on royalty taxation for the use of copyright objects, clarifies the grounds and key positions of the European Court of Human Rights for resolving disputes related to royalty taxation, and reveals the value of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in the development of the tax system of Ukraine.


 

References

[1] Agafonova, N.V.2005. The concept of royalty under the current legislation of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Chernivtsi University. Science of law, 306: 85–87.Сайт: http://library.chnu.edu.ua/res/library/elib/visnyk_chnu/visnyk_chnu_2005_0306.pdf.
[2] Bortnovska, Z. 2002. Cases on Taxation: The Limits of Application of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Decision. Comments 2: 207-219.
[3] Constitution of Ukraine of 1996. 1996. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0% BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80.
[4] Copyright and Related Rights: Law of Ukraine of December 23, 1993,No 3792-XII. 1993. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament).https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12/
[5] European Convention on Human Rights (1950). 1950. European Court of Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.
[6] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Ferrazzini v. Italy, 12 July 2001. 2001. European Court of Human Rights. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_167.
[7] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Nazarchuk v. Ukraine of 12 April 2005. 2005. Europe Cases. https://www.bailii.org/indices/eu-cases-0151.html.
[8] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Sporrong and Lonnrothv. Sweden of 23 September 1982. 1982. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_098.
[9] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Terem, Chechetkin and Julius v. Ukraine of 18 October 2005. 2005. European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-71022.
[10] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Brumarescu v. Romania, 28 November 1999. 1999. European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58337%22]}.
[11] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Bulves AD v. Bulgaria of 22 January 2009. 2009. Ligazakon. https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/view/SOO00553?ed=2009_01_22.
[12] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Fedorchenko and Lozenko v. Ukraine of 20 September 2012. 2012. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_933.
[13] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Intersplav v. Ukraine of 09 January 2007. 2007. European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-78872%22]}.
[14] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Johannesson and Others v. Iceland, of 18 May 2017. 2017. http://kmp.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ECHR_Case-of-J-HANNESSON-AND-OTHERS-v.-ICELAND.pdf.
[15] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Jussila v. Finland of 25 October 2006. 2006. Taxlink. https://taxlink.ua/ua/court/sprava-jussila-proti-finljandii/uk/#hcq=Qr5y8Vr https://taxlink.ua/ua/court/sprava-jussila-proti-finljandii/.
[16] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Khristov v. Ukraine, 19 December 2009. 2009. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_443.
[17] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Kozynets v. Ukraine of 06 December 2007. 2007. Verkhovna Rada (UkrainainParlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_334.
[18] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Shokin v. Ukraine of 14 October 2010. 2010. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_858.
[19] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Vastberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulich v. Sweden of 23 July 2002. 2002. European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-60627%22]}.
[20] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Rakitin v. Ukraine case of 11 January 2007. 2007. European Court of Human Rights. https://echr.coe.int/Documents/CLIN_2007_01_93_ENG_840247.PDF.
[21] Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Serkov v. Ukraine case of 7 July 2011. 2011. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SOO00264.html.
[22] Kononenko, V.P.2008. The usually legal nature of the precedent nature of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a monograph. Kharkiv: Law.
[23] Konovalenko, V. 2015. Royalty: the path of reform. The mirror of the week 12. http://gazeta.dt.ua/business/royalti-shlyah-reform-_.html.
[24] On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Balancing Budget Revenues in 2018: Law of Ukraine of December 07, 2017, No 2245- VІІІ. 2017. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.Ua/laws/show/2245-19#n84.
[25] On amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and some other legislative acts of Ukraine on improving the administration and revision of the rates of individual taxes and fees: Law of Ukraine of November 23, 2018, No 2628-VІІІ. 2018.Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2628-19#n85.
[26] On the Enforcement of Judgments and the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Law of Ukraine of 23 February 2006, No 3477-IV. 2006. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15.
[27] Paliyuk, V. 2003. Place of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Legal System of Ukraine. Case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Decision. Comments1: 211-224. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/9776/Paliyuk%20120130.pdf?sequence=1&is Allowed=y.
[28] Pashkovska, D. 2017. Royalty and Taxes: Real Risks for Business. Legal newspaper 17(567). https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/events/royalti-ta-podatki-realni-riziki-dlya-biznesu.html.
[29] Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention: Law of Ukraine of 17 July 1997, No 475/97-ВР. 1997. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-%D0%B2%D1%80.
[30] Ryadinskaya, V.A. 2014. Legal mechanism of tax on income of individuals from royalty: problems of legal regulation. Science and law enforcement 2(24): 248–255. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Nip_2014_2_41.
[31] Savchuk, T. 2018. Risks in payment of royalty in favor of a non-resident and their prevention. Lawyer and Law 17. https://id-legalgroup.com/ua/blog/riski-pri-viplate-royalti-v-polzy-nerezidenta-i-ih-predyprejdenie----tatyana-savchyk--ayditor-ID-Legal-Group.
[32] Shishkina, E. 2005. Some aspects of the legal nature of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Law of Ukraine 9: 102-105. http://liber.onu.edu.ua/opacunicode/index.php?url=/notices/index/IdNotice:171205/Source:default.
[33] Tax Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of December 02, 2010, No 2755-VІ. 2010. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17.
[34] The Civil Code of Ukraine of January 16, 2003, No 435-IV. 2003. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainain Parlament). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.
[35] Vakhitov, R.R. 2006. The European Court of Human Rights: a review of judicial practice on tax matters. Tax law in decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 2004. Moscow: Walters Clover.
[36] Vyshnevetsky, I. 2018. Equitable royalty taxation in Ukraine is a myth? Lawyer & Law. http://uz.ligazakon.ua/ua/magazine_article/EA011534.
Published
2019-12-31
How to Cite
SUKHANOVA, Daria et al. ECtHR Practice of Resolving Disputes on Royalty Taxation for the Use of Copyright Objects. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 7, p. 2113 – 2121, dec. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5006>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.7(45).24.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 10 No 7 (2019): JARLE Volume X Issue 7(45) Winter 2019
Section
Articles

The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.