Actual Vectors of Research in the Doctrine of the Judiciary
Abstract
The ways in which international entities and the judiciary function are of global importance. Each state has different strategies for resolving and developing the activities of national judicial systems, ways of executing decisions, investigating subjects, and ways of exercising judicial power. This article explores the ways and effectiveness of implementing the mediation institute and mediation judges using the Ukrainian space. The authors examined the models of mediation, the levels of responsibility of the subject-carrier of mediation powers, the functional potential of mediation. The article also gives examples of integration of national judicial systems into the international system. As a result of the study, the authors outline ways to introduce mediation and select appropriate models and outline key approaches of correlation of national judicial systems with intergovernmental bodies and coordination of national judicial systems with judicial authorities. This article may form the basis for further exploration of the doctrines of the judiciary.
References
[2] Bulkat, M.S. 2018. Theoretical and Legal Foundations of the Development and Functioning of the Judiciary. Publishing House Yurydychna dumka.
[3] Constitution of Ukraine. 1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр.
[4] Gren, N.M. 2016. Implementation of the Right of Human to a Fair Court through the Judicial Mediation Procedure: Theoretical and Legal Study. Lviv Polytechnic National University.
[5] International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/court.
[6] Izarova, I.O. 2014. Prospects for e-Justice in Civil Procedure in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University. Law Series. 24 (2): 44-47.
[7] Kiseleva, T. 2017. Integration of Mediation into the Judicial System of Ukraine. https://rm.coe.int/kyselova-t-mediation-integartion-ukr-new-31-07-2017/168075c1e7.
[8] Krasilovskaya, Z.V. 2017. Formation of the Mediation Institute in the Public Administration System: Theoretical and Legal Aspect. Odessa Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine.
[9] Mazaraki, N.A. 2019. Theoretical and Legal Principles of Introduction of Mediation in Ukraine. Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
[10] Mozhaykina, O. 2018. Legal analysis of the dispute settlement with the participation of a judge. Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law 2: 174-180.
[11] Opinion on proposals amending the draft law on amendments to the constitution to strengthen the independence of judges of Ukraine. 2013. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282013%29034-e.
[12] Polishchuk, M.Ya. 2016. Models of mediation: a comparative legal analysis of the experience of foreign countries. Judicial and Investigative Practice in Ukraine 2: 52-56.
[13] Romanadze, L.D. 2019. Restrictive disadvantages: what gaps in the drafts of the new EPC, CPC and CAP will interfere with the reconciliation of the parties by a judge or mediator. https://zib.com.ua/en/128584-kakie_probeli_v_proektah_novih_hpk_gpk_i_kas_budut_meshat_pr.html.
[14] Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.1998. http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_588.
[15] The Constitution of the United States of America.1787. http://lib.rada.gov.ua/static/LIBRARY/catalog/law/usa_const.htm.
[16] Treaty on the European Union. 1992. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_029.
[17] Ukrainian Mediation Center. http://www.ukrmediation.com.ua/en/pro-tsentr/misiia-i-zadachi-tsentru.
[18] Yasinovsky, I.G. 2014. Characterisation of mediation models in developed countries. Legal Bulletin 4 (33): 94-98.
[19] Yasinovsky, I.G. 2015. Competitive characteristics of the mediator: a theoretical and legal analysis. Law and Society 5 (2): 79-83.
[20] Yasinovsky, I.G. 2016. Implementation of Mediation Procedure into Ukrainian Legislation: Theoretical and Legal Analysis. National Academy of Internal Affairs.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.