Factors in the Fight against Corruption in the Context of Civil Society and the Rule of Law
The research analyzes the main conditions by having which the state is able to fight against corruption. The preconditions and means of fight against corruption are determined; the results of their implementation in life are considered based on the examples of some countries, namely, availability of effective legislation, political will of the state, specialized bodies of fight against corruption, the establishment of civil society. It is noted that the fight against corruption is the management through a developed network of social institutions created on the basis of ‘participatory democracy’, that is, the interaction of personality, society and state on the principles of social partnership. This concept refers to a complex of political relations and technologies, which establishes public supervision over the activities of state authorities. At the same time, the latter requires a political will to fight against corruption, the legislative provision of this fight and the strict implementation of the adopted legislative acts. The main task for the civil society structures in the fight against corruption is the implementation of public participation in the process of preparing, discussing, adopting and monitoring the implementation of power decisions. Corruption as a systemic problem in Ukraine, demoralizing society, generates such a negative phenomenon of legal consciousness as legal nihilism in the social environment.
 Busol, O. 2014. On restoring confidence in the judiciary is not a lustration law and needs to be revised. Public Opinion on Law-Making 8: 11-20.
 Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 5/2015 ‘On Ukraine 2020 Sustainable Development Strategy’, 2015. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015.
 Hartwig, D. 2017. E-declaring activists: fighting corruption or violating constitutional rights? http://www.pravo.org.ua/ua/news/20873542-e-deklaruvannya-aktivistiv-borotba-z-koruptsieyu-chi-porushennya-konstitutsiynih-prav.
 Karstedt, S. 1998. Coming to Terms with the past in Germany after 1945 and 1989: Public Judgements on Procedures and Justice. Law and Policy 20: 16-44.
 Knish, V.V. 2014. Methodological basis for understanding the nature and features of constitutional liability of the subjects of constitutional legal relations. Scientific Information Bulletin 10: 92-97.
 Kostezh, S. 2014. Lustration: political cleansing behind the breadth of reform. https://112.ua/statji/lyustraciya-politicheskie-chistki-za-shirmoy-reform-52164.html.
 Kostyuchenko, S. 2016. Lustration is not a war with the past, it is a struggle for the future. https://tiahnybok.info/.
 Law of Ukraine No. 1682-VII ‘On the Purification of Power’. 2014a. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1682-18.
 Law of Ukraine No. 1698-VII ‘On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine’. 2014b. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1698-18.
 Law of Ukraine No. 1699-VII ‘On the Principles of State Anti-Corruption Policy in Ukraine (Anti-Corruption Strategy) for 2014–2017’. 2014c. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1699-18.
 Law of Ukraine No. 1700-VII ‘On the Prevention of Corruption’. 2014d. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18.
 Law of Ukraine No. 2476-IV ‘On Ratification of the Civil Convention Against Corruption’. 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/2476-15.
 Law of Ukraine No. 251-V ‘On the Ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption’. 2006a. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/251-16.
 Law of Ukraine No. 252-V ‘On ratification of the Criminal Convention for the Suppression of Corruption’. 2006b. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/251-16.
 Law of Ukraine No. 580-VIII ‘On the National Police’. 2015a. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580-19.
 Law of Ukraine No. 772-VIII ‘On the National Agency of Ukraine for Detection, Investigation and Management of Assets Received from Corruption and Other Crimes’. 2015b. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/772-19.
 Law of Ukraine No. 794-VIII ‘On the State Bureau of Investigation’. 2015c. http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/794-19.
 Marchuk, M.P. 2016. Main directions of the state policy on combating corruption in Ukraine. Young Scientist 3(30): 470-474.
 Opinion of the Committee on Legal Policy and Justice of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 1776 ‘Concerning the Compliance of the Draft Law on Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (concerning the immunity of the People's Deputies of Ukraine and judges) with the requirements of anti-corruption legislation’. 2015. http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=53602.
 PACE Resolution on taking action to expose communist totalitarian systems. 1996. http://www.helsinki.org.ua/index.php?id=1268389478&w=%D0%E5%E7%EE%EB%FE%F6%B3%FF +1096.
 Podorozhna, T.S. 2014. Theoretical and Applied Principles of Constitutionalizationof the Legal System and Modernization of the Constitution of Ukraine. PAIS.
 Recommendation No. R 10 of the Committee of Ministers to Council of Europe member states on codes of conduct for public servants. 2000. http://www.dridu.dp.ua/cpk/Lib/7_Zapobigannya%20ta%20protydiya%20proyavam%20korup/Legislation/Legislature/Rekomend_poved_DS.pdf.
 Schwartz, G. 1994. Decisions of new constitutional courts in Central Europe regarding lustration. http://www.freedominfo.org/documents/RusPro/text_files/EastUropeProblems/1995-43-44/1995-43-44%20(189-203).pdf.
 Shevchuk, S. 2006. Lustration as retroactive justice: European standards for the protection of human rights in the transition to democratic governance. Law Journal 2: 65-80.
 The fight against corruption – foreign experience. 2019. http://argumentua.com/.
 Zadiraka, N., and Kabanets, R. 2014. The world experience in preventing and combating corruption: on the issue of integration of Ukrainian legislation into European Union law. Viche 10: 27–29.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.