European Union Enlargement in 2004: System Analysis of the Benefits and Losses

  • Vitaliy N. ZAVADSKYI Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Olena S. ALEKSANDROVA Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Nataliia N. VINNIKOVA Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Olha S. VYHOVSKA Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Iryna N. SPUDKA Zaporozhye National Technical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

Abstract

‘The Eastern enlargement’ of the European Union (EU) in 2004 that having become the global geopolitical event for the whole united Europe is considered in this article through philosophical understanding of the essence of the EU with use of the synergistic approach.


The authors propose the analysis of achievements and losses of enlargement of 2004 in the view of three levels of knowledge of key elements of European integration. The level of philosophical understanding is based on the synergetic approach to the research object. The geopolitical dimension actualized research on the understanding of the European Union as a world-system, which has a high level of self-organization. The political, economic, and social components form the third cluster, depending on the first two. Changes at this level are most noticeable, predominately they create a superficial image of the event. For the applicant countries, the experience of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltic could be useful in many ways. Analyzing the positive experience and taking into account the negative tendencies of European integration progress in historical, political and economic terms serves as an additional tool for adjusting the policy of approximation to the requirements of the EU.

References

[1] Buribayev, Y.A. et al. 2016. Pension reform in Kazakhstan: Main directions, conditions for implementation and development prospects. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11(18): 11611-11619.
[2] Donaj, L., and Zavadskyi, V. 2018. 15 years of the Baltic States membership in EU: Problems, perspectives and experience for Ukraine. Skhid 6: 46-51.
[3] Eurostat Yearbook. 2007. Europe in figures 2006-2007. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5611007/KS-CD-06-001-EN.PDF/bff24660-2fb5-4c11-a336-9d356a6fdda5?version=1.0.
[4] General overview of the enlargement process and the pre-accession strategy of the European Union. 2003. Brussels: European Commission, Enlargement Directorate. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/archives/pdf/historic_opportunity_2003_en.pdf.
[5] Hagemann, S., and De Clerck-Sachsse, J. 2007. Decision-making in the enlarged council of ministers: evaluating the facts’. CEPS Policy Brief 127: 1-8.
[6] Heider, B. 2018. The impact of EU Eastern enlargement on urban growth and decline: New insights from Germany's Eastern border. Papers in Regional Science. Available at: https://rsaiconnect.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pirs.12407.
[7] Horvath, J. 2002. The eastern enlargement of the EU. Economic Systems 26(2): 191-193.
[8] Ivanov, V.V. et al. 2019. Increasing the financial depth of the Russian economy: Does it stimulate investment activity? Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, April 10-11, in Granada, Spain.
[9] Jovanovic, M., and Damnjanović, J. 2014. EU eastern enlargement: economic effects on new members 2000-2012. Journal of Economic Integration 29(2): 210-243.
[10] Kelemen, R.D., Menon, A., and Slapin, J. 2014. Wider and deeper? Enlargement and integration in the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 21(5): 647-663.
[11] Khaustova, M.G. 2018. Legal integration: the theoretical aspect. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 25(1): 192-203.
[12] Kirillova, E.A. et al. 2017. Public interest as a ground for restriction of the ownership right. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 8(7): 2157-2164.
[13] Klaus, V. 2004. Sense of European Union enlargement: an attempt at initial analysis. Russia in Global Affairs 4: 45-52.
[14] Ko, J.-H. 2005. Eastern enlargement of the EU and its implications for east Asia. The Journal of Eurasian Studies 2: 187-216.
[15] Komarova, T.V. 2018. Organization of the judicial system of the European Union. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 25(1): 79-96.
[16] König, T. 2007. Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision making’. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 417-444.
[17] Levchenko, V.P. and Baranovskyy, O.I. 2017. Transformation in public administration in the context of the integration of the nonbank financial services market in Ukraine in the world financial prospect. Economics. Finances. Law 12(3): 4-9.
[18] Lukiyanova, M.N. et al. 2018. Tax capacity as a financial mechanism for implementation of the strategy for municipal formation. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences Volume XIII, Summer, 4(58): 906-922.
[19] Murinska, S., Aleksandrova, O., and Dodonov, R. 2018. Information warfare: future challenges of Latvia and Ukraine. Skhid 5: 66-72.
[20] O'Brennan, J. 2006. The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. Routledge.
[21] Osajda, K. 2018. Modern multi-source legal system and atypical sources of law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 25(3): 108-120.
[22] Petersson, B. 2019. Perspective on the eastern enlargement: triumph of the EU or seed of its destruction? In A. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, N. Bremberg, A. Michalski, L. Oxelheim (Eds.), Trust in the European Union in Challenging Times (pp. 41-63). Palgrave Macmillan.
[23] Pollack, M. 2009. Europe united? The impact of the EU’s eastern enlargement, five years on. European View 8: 239-254.
[24] Read, R., and Bradley, S. 2003. The economics of eastern enlargement of the EU. Industrial Relations Journal 32(5): 380-400.
[25] Ripetskiy, A.V., Mirolyubova, T.I., and Freylekhman, S.A. 2018. Analysis of factors that determine the possibility for automation of smoothing of product electronic model, obtained through topological optimization for the purpose of its use in the technological preparation of additive manufacturing. PeriodicoTcheQuimica 15 (Special Issue 1): 405-413.
[26] Rudenko, M.N. et al. 2016. Innovative activity of financial and industrial groups. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(S8): 108-114.
[27] Salimyanova, I.G. et al. 2019. Economy digitalization: Information impact on market entities. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 7(4): 654-658.
[28] Schmieder, J., and Weber, A. 2018. How did EU Eastern enlargement affect migrant labor supply in Austria? Focus on European Economic Integration 3: 113-127.
[29] Sedelmeier, U. 2001. EU eastern enlargement in comparative perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 662-670.
[30] Shtal, T.V. et al. 2018. Modeling of convergence of the economic system of Ukraine with G20 countries based on the analysis of structural changes in Ukrainian foreign trade. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(6): 2129-2145.
[31] Sloam, J. 2005. Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. The European Policy of the German Social Democrats. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[32] Suleimenova, G., Kadyrova, M., and Kenzhebaeva, A. 2018. Establishment of state bodies's performance assessment system. Public Policy and Administration 17(2): 203-215.
[33] Suprapto, N. et al. 2018. Minimizing misconception of ionization energy through three-tier diagnostic test. Periodico Tche Quimica 15(30): 387-396.
[34] Tkachenko, S.A., and Potyshniak, O.M. 2019. Functionally developed production of analytical and accounting and economic information empiricists (data). Economics. Finances. Law 4: 18-21.
[35] Toshkov, D. 2017. The impact of the Eastern enlargement on the decision-making capacity of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 24(2): 177-196.
[36] Wood, S. 2003. Is eastern enlargement of the European Union a beneficial investment for Germany? Political Science Quarterly 2: 281-306.
[37] Zagoršeková, N., Čiefová, M., and Čambalíková, A. 2017. Competitiveness and economic growth in the European Union. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume VIII, Winter, 8(30): 2408-2418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v8.8(30).11.
[38] Zavadskyi, V.М. 2009. The first results of Baltic membership in the European Union. Historical Notes 9: 55-62.
Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
ZAVADSKYI, Vitaliy N. et al. European Union Enlargement in 2004: System Analysis of the Benefits and Losses. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. 1714-1722, sep. 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4942>. Date accessed: 26 feb. 2021.