Risk-Management of Investment Projects in Implementation of Objects of Real Economy
Abstract
Risk management in financial operations is based on a diverse structure and mobility of the portfolio that allow for a structural change of a project - namely, achieving synergies in the formation of the investment portfolios. However, financial operations do not always correlate with the stock exchange rules or other covenants. This provides important evidence for the restructuring purposes of the investment portfolio. In this regard, forecasting and the development of the toolkit of the risk management may be implemented only under conditions of the real object of the economy. The idea that objects of the real economy carry not only the risk of loss of the investment but also potential a technical damage is deemed to be a scientific novelty. As a place of technical damage in the system of the risk-management, it is considered to be a possible loss for the investor not only within a separate project but also throughout the whole project. In this regard, the author has carried out significant calculations according to her own methodology based on the implementation of a project of the real economy. Construction of the risk management system in an enterprise is a persistent rigorous process that requires a tremendous amount of financial, material and human resources. The practical significance of the study is defined by the need for a detailed definition of the risk-management’s practical use and qualities applied to the investment portfolio in the implementation of objects of the real economy, which explains the relevance of the study under consideration.
References
[2] Benedeti, J.P.C. and Foliaco, A.C.L. 2016. The inherent risk of the supplier as a preventative criterion in public procurement. Revista Derecho del Estado, 37: 95-125.
[3] Brooks, D. 2011. Security risk management: a psychometric map of expert knowledge structure. Risk Management, 13(1): 17-41.
[4] Dandage, R.V., Mantha, S.S., Rane, S.B. and Bhoola, V. 2018. Analysis of Interactions among Barriers in Project Risk Management. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 14(1): 153-169.
[5] Diers, D. 2011. Management strategies in multi-year enterprise risk management. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 36(1): 107-125.
[6] Gnevasheva, V.A. 2019. The specifics of the economic activity of modern Russian corporations. Espacios, 40(4): 21.
[7] Goloshchapova, L.V., Plaskova, N.S., Prodanova, N.A., Yusupova, S.Y. and Pozdeeva, S.N. 2018. Analytical review of risks of loss of profits in cargo transportation. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(11): 1897-1902.
[8] Herbane, B. 2005. Risk management on the Internet. Risk Management, 7(3): 65-66.
[9] Hodges, A. 2000. Emergency risk management. Risk Management, 2(4): 7-18.
[10] Hood, J. and Young, P.C. 2003. The risk management implications of outsourcing claims management services in local government. Risk Management, 5(3): 7-17. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240153.
[11] Hoogeveen, N.Y. 2006. Risk based management approach in contaminated land management practices. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 25(1): 125-125. DOI: 10.1007/BF02839979.
[12] Ivanov, V.V., Lvova, N.A., Pokrovskaia, N.V., Nurmukhametov, R.K. and Naumenkova, S.V. 2019. Increasing the financial depth of the Russian economy: Does it stimulate investment activity? Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 2747-2759.
[13] Jivita, S. and Poongavanam, S. 2018. Risk-taking proficiencies of female occupation persons following occupational evolution. Medico-Legal Update, 18(1): 435-438.
[14] Kanno, J. 2015. Discussion on the boundary of risk assessment and risk management. Genes and Environment, 37(1): 9-9. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-015-0008-6.
[15] Kholod, M., Lyandau, Y., Maslennikov, V., Kalinina, I. and Mrochkovskiy, N. 2019. Upper level processes and projects model building. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 143: 267-276.
[16] Kloman, F.H. 1992. Rethinking risk management. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 17(3): 299-313. DOI: 10.1057/gpp.1992.19.
[17] Mishchenko, V., Naumenkova, S., Ivanov, V. and Tishchenko, I. 2018. Special aspects of using hybrid financial tools for project risk management in Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(2): 257-266.
[18] Mustafa, F.M. and Nimer, M.B.A. 2018. The association between enterprise risk management and corporate governance quality: The mediating role of internal audit performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume IX, 4(34): 1387-1401.
[19] Piyapong, J. and Watanabe, T. 2016. Improving environmental risk management-contamination risks and stakeholders' perception. Environmental Policy and Law, 45(6): 294-309.
[20] Plaskova, N.S., Prodanova, N.A., Zatsarinnaya, Е.I., Korshunova, L.N. and Chumakova, N.V. 2017. Methodological support of organizations implementing innovative activities investment attractiveness estimation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume VIII, 8(30): 2533-2539.
[21] Raz, T. and D. Hillson. 2005. A comparative review of risk management standards. Risk Management, 7(4): 53-66. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240227.
[22] Rusu, M. and Soare, I. 2018. Comparative risk assessment in applicative aerospace projects using different approaches. INCAS Bulletin, 10(2): 233-246.
[23] Scherer, B. 2011. Buy side risk management – managing fees at risk. Journal of Asset Management, 12(4): 225-234. DOI: 10.1057/jam.2011.18.
[24] Tippins, S.C. 2004. Risk management: where is it and where does it belong? Risk Management, 6(3): 9-11.
[25] Topchiy, D., Skakalau, V. and Yurgaytis, A. 2018. Comprehensive verification construction compliance control as the developer's project risk reduction tool. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(1): 985-993.
[26] Udalova, Z., Burtseva, K., Alekseev, A. and Udalov, A. 2019. Accounting and analytical aspect of risk management of agricultural organizations. 12th International Scientific Conference on Agricultural Machinery Industry, INTERAGROMASH 2019. 10-13 September. Rostov-on-Don: Don State Technical University, article number 012130.
[27] Valle, L.D. 2012. Erratum to: Bayesian copulae distributions, with application to operational risk management. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 14(4): 1121. DOI: 10.1007/s11009-011-9222-2
[28] Weigel, Ch., Hiebl, M.R.W. and Wiedemann, A. 2018. Vom risk management zur risk governance. Controlling and Management Review, 62(1): 34-40. DOI: 10.1007/s12176-017-0130-3.
*** Disease management at risk from us patient-privacy law? 1999. Pharmaco Economics & Outcomes News Weekly, 205(1): 11-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF03295087.
*** EMA publishes first risk management plan summary. 2014. Reactions Weekly, 1494(1): 2-2.
*** ESC highlights need for screening, risk management in light of OTC statins. 2004. Pharmaco Economics & Outcomes News, 454(1): 2-2. DOI: 10.2165/00151234-200404540-00001
*** European Risk Management Strategy Status and Future Plans. 2005. Reactions Weekly 1052(1): 2-2. DOI: 10.2165/00128415-200510520-00001.
*** Japan introduces risk management plans. 2013. Reactions Weekly, 1452(1): 2-2.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.