ANOTHER LOOK AT THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF DEATH PENALTY
Abstract
There is a question whether the execution rate is appropriate to examine the deterrent effect of death penalty. Instead of using execution rate, this paper uses dummy variables to categorize states into different groups and to compare the group mean homicide rates. With US state-level panel data for the period 1995 – 2006, this paper fails to find a significant homicide-reducing effect of death penalty.References
[2] Dezhbakhsh, H., Rubin, P.H., Shepherd, J.M. 2003. Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data. American Law and Economics Review 5(2):344-376.
[3] Donohue, J., Wolfers J. 2005. Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in The Death Penalty Debate. Stanford Law Review 58: 791-845.
[4] Katz, L., Levitt, S.D., Shustorovich, E. 2003. Prison Conditions, Capital Punishment, and Deterrence. American Law and Economics Review 5(2):318-343.
[5] Mocan, H.N, Gittings, R.K. 2003. Getting Off Death Row: Commuted Sentences and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment. Journal of Law and Economics 46(2):453-478.
[6] Mocan, H.N., Gittings, R.K. 2006. The Impact of Incentives on Human Behavior: Can We Make it Disappear? The Case of the Death Penalty. NBER Working Paper 12631.
[7] Plümper, T., Troeger, V. 2007. Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects. Political Analysis Vol. 15:2, 124-139.
[8] Zimmerman, P.R. 2004. State Executions, Deterrence, and the Incidence of Murder, Journal of Applied Economics 7(1):163-193.
Keywords
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.