Mobility and Competitive Action on Competitive Advantage of Indonesian Small Medium Enterprises in the Clothing Industries

  • Zeis ZULTAQAWA Business Administration Department, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Benny ALEXANDRI Business Administration Department, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Muhammad RIZAL Business Administration Department, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Nenden KOSTINI Business Administration Department, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Donie AULIA Business Administration Department, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how mobility and competitive action affect the competitive advantage of SMEs business sector in the clothing industries in Indonesia. This research is based on a quantitative approach using a population of clothing industries in Bandung Regency. Samples are taken with random sampling techniques. Samples are 110 SMEs producing clothing. Data is processed using Descriptive Analysis and Path Analysis. The findings show that mobility has no impact on competitive advantaged but has high impact on competitive action also has a positive effect on competitive advantage in SMEs in Bandung Regency. This research shows that mobility and competitive action can create a competitive advantage in the clothing industries in Bandung Regency although in small impact.

References

[1] Chen, M.J., and Miller, D. 2015. Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework. Strategic Management Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2245.
[2] Chi, L., Ravichandran, T., Andrevski, G. 2010. Information technology, network structure, and competitive action. Information Systems Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0296.
[3] Ferrier, W.J., Smith, K.G., and Grimm, C.M. 1999. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257009.
[4] Grimm, C.M, Lee, H., and Smith, K.G. 2005. Strategy as Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage. Series: Strategic Management, Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0195161440, 288 pp.
[5] Harashima, T. 2017. The Mechanism behind Product Differentiation: An Economic Model. Journal of Advanced Research in Management, Volume VIII, Winter, 2(16): 95-111. Available at: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/ jarm/article/view/1925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarm.v8.2(16).01
[6] Jehangir, M., Dominic, P.D., Naseebullah, D., and Khan, A. 2011. Digital Towards economy: The development of ICT and E-commerce in Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 5(2): 171-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v5n2p171.
[7] McAdam, R., Reid, R., Harris, R., and Mitchell, N. 2008. Key determinants of organizational and technological innovation in UK SMEs: an empirical study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2008.018607.
[8] Mihalic, T., and Buhalis, D. 2013. The competitive advantage of small transitional hotels in the Sector. Economic and Business Review, 15(1): 33– 56.
[9] Pylypenko, N.M., Pylypenko, V.V., and Kuchkova, K.O. 2018. Advantages of Agricultural Enterprises from the Perspective of the Analysis of the Competition’s Conditions, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Volume IX, Winter, 8(38): 2774-2789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.8(38).27.
[10] Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors: With a New Introduction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.540.
[11] Porter, M.E. 1985a. Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-11-4354.
[12] Porter, M.E. 1985b. Technology and Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Strategy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075.
[13] Sambamurthy, Bharadwaj, and Grover. 2003. Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualising the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2): 237-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530.
[14] Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro- foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.
[15] Wiklund, J., and Shepherd, D. 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092- 8674(94)90312-3.
[16] Wiklund, J., and Shepherd, D. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1): 71–91.
[17] Wollenschläger, F. 2011. New fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration. European Law Journal, 17(1): 1–34.
[18] Morozova, I., Litvinova, T., Mordvintsev, I.A., and Konina, O.V. 2018. Using Public-Private Partnership for Stimulating Innovational Developments in the Infrastructural Sphere, Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. Volume IX, Summer, 4(34): 1382-1386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.4(34).26.
Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
ZULTAQAWA, Zeis et al. Mobility and Competitive Action on Competitive Advantage of Indonesian Small Medium Enterprises in the Clothing Industries. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 1148-1158, june 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4882>. Date accessed: 20 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.4(42).15.