The Profile of Crime and Security Conditions in Province DI Yogyakarta (DIY) and Willingness to Pay (WTP) of the People for Reducing Crime Rate
Abstract
The amount of WTP is useful for policy making to reduce crime rates. This study aims to reveal the crime profile of districts/cities in DIY, to know empirically the WTP of the community in DIY for reducing the property crime and non-property crime. It is also to examine how various factors influence on the probability of the willingness to pay. This study used data from samples through a purposive proportional sampling survey of the population of districts/cities in DIY. The Contingent Valuation Method was used to acquire the ability to pay of respondents for reducing crime rates. Various factors that influence the probability of paying were revealed by the econometric approach. The results show that crime intensity in DIY basically follows the trend in Indonesia both in terms of number and crime rate in 2014-2016. The DIY crime rate ranks first in the Java Island and greater than in Indonesia. The average WTP of the population is Rp401.3thousand, so there is a potential fund of Rp1,179.4 billion which can be provided in a year. Individual factors that influence the probability of willingness to pay are the location of the respondent's domicile. According to socio-economic factors, there is no factor that influences the probability. Related to victims of crime, the status of the victim, the type of crime, and who is the offender influence the probability. According to environmental conditions, only the geographical conditions affect the probability. Moreover, only factor in the form of physical impact affects the probability. Population perceptions of payment obligations through tax mechanism to reduce crime and monthly expenses in anticipation of crimes affect the probability of willingness to pay.
References
[2] Ambrey, C.L., Fleming, C.M., and Manning, M. 2012. The life satisfaction approach to estimating the cost of crime: An individual’s willingness-to-pay for crime reduction. Discussion Papers Economics No. 2013-01 ISSN 1837-7750.
[3] Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., and Higins, C.C. 2001. Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1.
[4] Bishop, K.C., and Murphy, A.D. 2011. Estimating the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Violent Crime: A Dynamic Approach. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 101:3, 625–629.
[5] Bishop, K.C., and Timmins, C. 2011. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Marginal Willingness to Pay for Differentiated Products Without Instrumental Variables. Working Paper 17611 National Bureau Of Economic Research, 1050 Massach,
[6] Brand, S., and Price, R. 2000. The economic and social costs of crime. London: Home Office Research Study 217.
[7] Buonanno, P., and Montolio, D. 2008. Identifying the Socio-economic and Demographic Determinants of Crime across Spanish Provinces. International Review of Law and Economics 28.2, 89-97.
[8] Cerro, A.M., and Meloni, O. 2000. Determinant of the Crime Rate in Argetina in the 90’s. Estudios de Economia, diciembri, ano, vol/27, numero 002, Universidad de Chile, Santiago Chile, 297-311.
[9] Dubourg, R., Hamed, J., and Thorns, J. 2005. Developments in the estimates of the costs of crime in England and Wales. In The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04: Home Office Online Report 30/05. London: Home Office,
[10] Fjeldstad, Odd-H., and Tungodden, B. 2003. Fiskal Corruption: A Vice or a Virtue? World Development Vol. 31, No. 8, 1459–1467.
[11] Garoupa, N.M. 1998. The Role of Moral Values in the Economic Analysis of Crime: A General Equilibrium Approah.’ Universitat Pompeu Fabra Economics Working Paper No. 245.
[12] Han, Lu, Bandyopadhyay, S., and Bhatta, S. 2011. Determinants of Violent and Property crimes in England: A Panel Data Analysis. Discussion Papers 10-26r, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
[13] Hanley, N., Philip, L., MacMillan, D., and Wright, R. 2001. Willingness to pay for the conservation and management of wild geese in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit,
[14] Hite, D., Hudson, D., and Intarapapong, W. 2002. Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Improvements: The Case of Precision Application Technology. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27(2) Western Agricultural Economics Association, 433-449.
[15] Joewono, Tri Basuki. 2009. Exploring the Willingness and Ability to Pay for Paratransit in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 2.
[16] Jogja.tribunnews.com. 2016. Fenomena Klitih Meresahkan Masyarakat Yogya. Yogyakarta, 09 04,
[17] JPNN.com. Rayakan Ultah, Kopassus Panen Dukungan JK Harapkan Mahkamah Militer Pertimbangkan Sisi Moral Penyerang LP Cebongan. April 16, 2013. JPNN.com (accessed April 17, 2013).
[18] Kompas.com. Ini Kronologi Aksi ‘Klitih’ di Yogyakarta yang Tewaskan Pelajar SMP. Jakarta, 03 14, 2017.
[19] Krug, E.G., et al. 2002. World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO.
[20] Lambsdorff, J.G. 2006. Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? In International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, by Susan Rose Ackerman. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,
[21] Levitt, S.D. 2004. Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that explain the Decline and Six that Do Not. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18, No. 1, 163-190.
[22] Persson, M., and Svensson, M. 2012. The Willingness to Pay to Reduce School Bullying. Karlstad University Working Papers in Economics, 2012 / 3, Dept. of Economics, Karlstad University,
[23] Prabowo, D. 2013. Komnas HAM Akan Panggil Komandan Grup II Kopassus. Kompas.com (accessed april 17, 2013).
[24] Pradiptyo, R. 2007. Does Punishment Matter? A Refinement of the Inspection Game. Review of Law and Economics, 3:2.
[25] Pradiptyo, R. 2009. Korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif Ilmu Ekonomi. In Korupsi dan Mengkorupsi di Indonesia, by Wijayanto and Ridwan Zachrie, 154. Jakarta: Gramedia.
[26] Public Safety Canada. Crime Prevention through Social Development. 2011. http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca (accessed 06 22, 2011).
[27] Sihombing, I. 2013. Pascainsiden Cebongan, Massa Hadiahi Kopassus Tumpeng Raksasa. Metrotvnews.com (accessed April 17, 2013).
[28] Soeiro, M.M.M. 2009. Willingness to pay for violent crime reduction: a contingent valuation study for higher education students. Master Dissertation in Economics, Faculdade de Economia da Universidade do Porto,
[29] Sub Direktorat Statistik Politik dan Keamanan. Statistik Kriminal 2016. Jakarta: BPS, 2016.
[30] Teixera, A.A.C., and Soeiro, M. 2013. Determinants of Student's Willingness to Pay for Violent Crime Reduction. The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 58, No. 4 (2013) 1350027, 1350027.
[31] The World Bank. 2000. Anticorruption in Transition A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
[32] Triyana, B. 2010. Petrus: Kisah Gelap Orba. December 20, Historia.co.id (accessed 04 20, 2013).
[33] Weatherburn, D. 1992. Economic Adversity and Crime. Trends and Issues in crime and criminal, justice Australian Institute of Criminology.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.