Public Organization as a Subject of Civil Legal Relations According to Law of Ukraine and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Countries
Abstract
The activities of civil-society structures, an integral part of which are public associations, is one of the most important conditions for the implementation of effective socio-political and economic transformations and reforms. The issue of obtaining the status of a civil legal entity by a public organization requires further development. Common ‘inherited’ by states archaic norms of civil law of the Soviet Union, despite their successful multi-year approbation, require their qualitative renewal in the light of globalization and the implementation of European standards and requirements. The urgency of the topic is also determined by the need of Ukrainian society in effective public organizations that act as a full participant in civil legal relations, are a component of civil society and a catalyst for its growth and Europeanisation. The peculiarities of the legislative interpretation of the terms ‘public associations’ and ‘public organizations’ in Ukraine and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries were analyzed. A comparative legal analysis of the status of public organizations in Ukraine and CIS countries was conducted. The discussion position regarding the increase of the influence of public organizations on the state authorities and the management of society was reviewed. It was substantiated that the purpose of the activity of modern civil-society organizations as subjects of civil legal relations should be the long-term planning of the mechanism of realization of certain social priorities.
References
[1] Abramov, R.A., Mukhaev, R.T., Sokolov, M.S. 2016. To a question about the criteria and parameters of the effectiveness of the government in democratic countries. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 7(6): 1248-1262.
[2] Alekseev, S.S. 2008. General theory of law. TK Velbi, Prospect Publishing House.
[3] Association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. 2014.
[4] Benedeti, J.P.C., and Foliaco, A.C.L. 2016. The inherentrisk of the supplieras a preventative criterion in public procurement. Revista Derechodel Estado 37: 95-125.
[5] Berchenko, G.V. 2011. Constitutional principles of civil society in Ukraine. National Law University named after Yaroslav the Wise.
[6] Bodnar, T.V. 2007. Some problems of protection of civil rights in contractual obligations. University Research Notes 2: 113-118.
[7] Borisova, V.I. 2000. The problem of legal personality of a legal entity. Issues of Legality: Republican Interdepartmental Scientific Collection 43: 33-38.
[8] Boryslavska, O., et al. 2012. Decentralization of public power: the experience of European countries and perspectives of Ukraine. Individual entrepreneur Moskalenko O.M.
[9] Bran, F., Radulescu, C.V., Ioan, I. 2016. Issues to be addressed for enhancing the contribution of public participation in sustainable development strategies. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita 1: 25-34.
[10] Bratus`, S.M. 1947. Legal entities in Soviet civil law. Scientific works: Concept, types, state legal entities. Publishing House of the Ministry of Justice of the USSR.
[11] Byutsun, I.V. 2006. Association of legal entities in civil law: comparative and legal analysis. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[12] Cherupahin, B.B. 2001. Proceedings in civil law. Statut.
[13] Covert, J. 2016. Wild life justice commission: First public hearing: Investigating wild life trafficking in Viet Nam. Environmental Policy and Law 46(6): 368-370.
[14] Dmitriev, Yu.A. 2009. Civil society in Russia. Problems of formation and development. UNITY-DANA.
[15] Dobkina, K.R. 2014. Features of the legal status of production cooperatives as an entity. Young Scientist 11(14): 152-154.
[16] Domansky, J. 2016. Risk categories and risk management processes in nonprofit organizations. Foundations of Management 8: 227-242.
[17] Dovgert, A.S. 2014. Legislation of Ukraine on private international law: sources of borrowing. Private Law and Entrepreneurship 13: 13-17.
[18] Dudorova, K.B. 2015. Problems of compensation for moral damage caused to an individual as a result of violation of a civil contract. Bulletin of Lugansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko 2: 210-219.
[19] Dură, N.V. 2018. The relationships between the state and the church and their legal regime. Rules of international and national law. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 12(4): 192-201.
[20] Dzera, A.V. 2002. The concept of civil law and its place in the system of law of Ukraine. Bulletin of Khmelnitsky Institute of Regional Management and Law 2: 9-13.
[21] Egorov, A.V. 2006. Institutions as non-profit legal entities under the civil law of Russia. Volgograd State University.
[22] Evers, A., and Laville, J. 2004. Social services by social enterprise: on the possible contributions of hybrid organizations and a civil society. In: A. Evers and J. Laville (Eds.), The Third Sector in Europe, 237 255. Edward Elgar.
[23] Federal Law ‘On Public Associations’ dated May 19, 1995 N 82-FZ. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_6693/.
[24] Feldman, M.S. 1989.The oedipal complex: manifestations in the inner world and the therapeutic situation. In: R. Britton, M. Feldman& E. O’Shaugnessy (Eds.), The Oedipal Complex Today. Karnac Books.
[25] Filatova, N.Yu. 2014. Self-regulatory organizations as subjects of civil law. National Law University named after Yaroslav the Wise.
[26] Filatova, N.Yu. 2017. Regulation of features of electronic contracts: comparative legal analysis. Problems of Legality 139: 63-77.
[27] Fischer, M., Greenlee, J., Gordon, T., and Keating, E. 2007. An investigation of fraud in non-profit organizations: occurences and detterents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36: 676-694.
[28] Frolov, V.D. 2004. Legal capacity of a legal entity and its implementation under the civil law of Ukraine (civilistic aspect). National University ‘Odesʹ ka Yurydychna Akademiya’.
[29] Fuchegi, V.D. 2014. The legal characteristics of civil relations. South Ukrainian Law Journal 2: 71-73.
[30] Fukuyama, F. 2010. A strong state: governance and world order in the 21st century. AST.
[31] Galantich, M.K., and Cochin, V.V. 2013. Scientific and practical commentary of the law of Ukraine ‘On Public Associations’. Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship named after Academician F.G. Burchak NAPR of Ukraine.
[32] Gonyukova, L. 2005. Legal aspect of interaction of public-political associations and state power. Topical Problems of Public Administration 1(19): 73-82.
[33] Ilynykh, S.A., et al. 2018. The tools of social technologies in the management system: Private and public. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(4): 1267-1277.
[34] Johar, S.S., and Johar, G.S. 2017. A simple and cogent forensic technique to trap and nab a bribe-seeking corrupt public servant ‘blue-handed’. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 11(1): 43-54.
[35] Karmaza, O.O., et al. 2019 Civil law contract: Doctrinal and legal approaches. Asia Life Sciences 21(2): 821-836.
[36] Karnauk, T.P. 2014. Personal non-property rights of legal entities. PhD diss., Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[37] Karthikeyan, K., and Ashok, J. 2018. Near optimal explicit guidance law with impact angle constraints for a hypersonicre-entry vehicle. INCAS Bulletin 10(2): 39-51.
[38] Khadzhyradieva, S., Hrechko, T., Savkov, A. 2019. Behavioral insights in public policy: Ukrainian case. Public Policy and Administration 18(1): 85-99.
[39] Kharitonov, Y.O. 2017. Ukraine - Europe: private law adaptation problems. Feniks.
[40] Kharitonova, O.I., and Kharitonov, E.O. 2006. Comparative law of Europe. Fundamentals of comparative law: European traditions. Odyssey.
[41] Kibenko, A.R. 2013. Organizational and legal forms of state enterprise and state joint-stock company: comparative legal analysis. Law and Innovation Society 1: 125-141.
[42] Kılıçaslan, H. 2018. Urban metaphors in the interaction of child with public space. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 10(3): 19-30.
[43] Kizdarbekova, A., Karibayeva, A. 2014. Legal mechanisms of competition protection in the CIS countries: Kazakhstan case study. Actual Problems of Economics 156(6): 92-99.
[44] Knobel, A. 2015. Eurasian Economic Union: prospects for development and possible obstacles. Economics 3: 87-108.
[45] Kokhanovskaya, O.V., and Kuznetsova, N.S. 2016. Modern private law of Ukraine: vectors of European development. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 3: 49-55.
[46] Kossak, V.M., and Yakubovsky, I.E. 2007. Intellectual property law. Istyna.
[47] Kostruba, A.V. 2018. Legal regulatory mechanism of social relations for ensuring dynamics in civil relationship. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(5), 1689-1695.
[48] Kryvenko, V.V. 2005. Religious organizations as subjects of private law of Ukraine. Actual Problems of the State and Law 25: 225-228.
[49] Kucherenko, I.M. 2007. Organizational and legal forms of legal entities of public law. University Research Notes 2: 134-146.
[50] Kuznetsova, N.S. 2005. The problem of compliance of civil law of Ukraine with the standards of European law. University Research Notes 1-2: 66-69.
[51] Law of the Republic of Belarus ‘On Public Associations’ dated October 04, 1994 No. 3254-XІІ. https://kodeksy-by.com/zakon_rb_ob_obwestvennyh_obedineniyah.htm.
[52] Law of the Republic of Tajikistan ‘On Public Associations’ dated May 12, 2007 No. 258. http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=17358.
[53] Law of Ukraine ‘On Citizens' Associations’ dated June 16, 1992 No. 2460-XII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2460-12.
[54] Law of Ukraine ‘On Public Associations’ dated March 22, 2012 No. 4572-VІ. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17/ed20120322.
[55] Ledyaev, V.G. 2007. Democracy. In: Great Russian Encyclopaedia. https://bigenc.ru/sociology/text/1947138.
[56] Lewis, D. 2008. ‘Non-governmentalism’ and the reorganisation of public action: management and the rise of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). In: S. Dar and B. Cooke (Eds.), The New Development Management: Critiquing the Dual Modernization, 41-55. Zed Books.
[57] Lipset, M. 2016. Political human: social policy foundations. Mysl.
[58] Luts, V.V. 2002. Theoretical problems of contract law in the context of the new civil code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Khmelnitsky Institute of Regional Governance and Law 2: 29-30.
[59] Maidanyk, R.A. 2002. Problems of trust relations in civil law. Kyiv University.
[60] Mambetov, F.K. 2015. The system of non-profit organsations of Russia. Law and Economics 6: 8-15.
[61] Mamutov, V.K.2013. About public property in a mixed economy. Economics and Law 1: 5-18.
[62] Menzhul, M.V. 2011. Public organizations as subjects of civil law. Institute of Security and Law named after V.M. Koretsky.
[63] Meyer,D.I. 2003. Russian civil law. Statut.
[64] Mises, F. 2012. Human activity: a treatise on economic theory. Socium.
[65] Nikonova, O.V. 2018. The development of the social protection system in the context of improving the legal and economic status of public organizations in the Russian Federation. Astra Salvensis 6(12): 679-687.
[66] Nogaibayev, Y., Shedenova, N., Satybaldiyeva, G. 2019. Governance and internalisation in social policy: Definition, concepts and causes. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22(1): 1544-0044-22-1-298.
[67] Novolodskaya, G.I., et al. 2018. Public-private partnership as innovative form of attraction of financial resources in sphere of tourism. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 9(4): 714-720.
[68] Odinaev, A.Sh. 2007. Legal aspects of building a civil society in the Republic of Tajikistan. Law and Act 12: 108-109.
[69] Parsons, T. 1979. An approach to the theory of organizations. Organizational Science 13(1): 249-273.
[70] Paruta, J.I. 2014. Theoretical and legal aspects of determining the organizational and legal form of public association. Private Law and Entrepreneurship 13: 74-76.
[71] Pashina, L.L., et al. 2018. Public-private partnership: Its essence and specificity. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(8): 2733-2739.
[72] Piddubna, V.F. 2014. Civil law status of a production cooperative. University Research Notes 4: 69-79.
[73] Plakhina, I.V. 2013. Liability for damages in the law of Germany, France, England and the USA. Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine 4: 1-7.
[74] Powell, W.W., and Di Maggio, P.J. (Eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
[75] Primak, V.D. 2013. Peculiarities of moral damages compensation as a measure of civil liability. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law 3: 175-179.
[76] Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
[77] Rosencranz, A., Vora, A. 2016. Public trust doctrine: A comparative analysis. Environmental Policy and Law 46(6): 378-380.
[78] Sanavvarov, G.B. 2014. The Formation and development of the administrative and legal status of public associations in the Republic of Tajikistan. Tajik State University of Business Law and Politics.
[79] Saniakhmetova, N.O. 2005. Concession contract as a form of investment. Actual Problems of the State and Law 25: 294-297.
[80] Semchik, V.I., and Podolyak, S. 2010. Restitution in Ukrainian and European contract law. Bulletin of the Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine 1: 206-214.
[81] Sergeeva, S.A. 2018. Sustainable socio-economic development of the country using the results of statistical analysis of the public procurement volume. Astra Salvensis 6: 147-157.
[82] Shashkova, A.V., Polovchenko, K.A., Volevodz, A.G. 2019. Questioning state corporations as special forms of legal entities. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 7: 186-203.
[83] Shershenevich, G.F. 2003. The science of civil law in Russia. Statut.
[84] Shevchenko, Ya.M. 2009. The role and importance of civil law subjects in society. Legal Bulletin. Air and Space Law 2: 39-46.
[85] Shimon, S.I. 2010. The relation between the concepts of ‘object of civil rights’ and ‘object of civil legal relations’ (to scientific discussion). Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University 18(10): 217-225.
[86] Shishko, R.B. 2013. Determination of the subject of comparative civil law in modern conditions. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of State Tax Service of Ukraine 2: 228-232.
[87] Soifer, T.V. 2018. Non-profit organizations: problems of civil legal personality. Journal of Russian Law 1: 30-39.
[88] Spasibo-Fateyeva, I.V. 2019. On the property liability of legal entities for the obligations of the state. Law of Ukraine 1: 204-216.
[89] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. 2019. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
[90] Stefanchuk, R.O. 2013. Modern problems of private law (to the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the civil code of Ukraine). Private Law 1: 94-105.
[91] Sukhanov, E.O. 2001.Owner ship in modern Russia. ROSSPNZ.
[92] Surov, A.F. 2016. The role of the self-regulation system in the implementation of public law functions. The Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice19: 79-84.
[93] Tatsiy, V., Serohina, S. 2018. Bicameralism: European tendencies and perspectives for Ukraine. Baltic Journal of European Studies 8(1): 101-122.
[94] The Civil Code of the Republic of Belarus. 1998. http://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=hk9800218.
[95] The Civil Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. 1999. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/ru/tj/tj013ru.pdf.
[96] The Civil Code of the Republic of RussianFederation.1994. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/9027690.
[97] The Civil Code of the Republic of Ukraine. 2003. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.
[98] Tikhonova, M.A. 2013. The concept and place of the outsourcing agreement for intellectual property management in the civil law of Ukraine. Our Right 2: 157-160.
[99] Tocqueville, A.D. 2003. Democracy in America and two essays on America. Penguin Books.
[100] Trufanova, L.M. 2004. The modern concept of legal entity (legal aspects) state and law. PhD diss., V.M. Koretsky National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
[101] Ushchypivska, L.V. 2015. Civil law status of public associations. Institute of Security and Law named after V.M. Koretsky.
[102] van der Voet, J. 2014. Leading change in public organizations. A study about the role of leadership in the implementation of organizational change in a public sector context. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
[103] Velásquez, A.G. 2017. Public and previous consultation on administrative rule-making in the Colombian legal system. Revista Derechodel Estado 38: 97-125.
[104] Vinnik,O.M. 2011. Forms and models of public-private partnership. University Research Notes 1: 159 169.
[105] Vitka,Yu.V. 2006. The civil legal characteristics of the non-state pension fund assets management agreement. University Scientific Notes 3-4: 213-216.
[106] Yakimov, A.Yu. 2003. The status of the legal subject (theoretical issues). State and Law 4: 5-10.
[107] Yankovskaya, E.V. 2011. Constitutional and legal status of public associations in the Republic of Belarus. Belarusian State University.
[108] Yatchenko, E.O. 2007. The special status of a religious organization as a subject of civil legal relations and the owner of property. Ukrainian Religious Studies 44: 59-70.
[109] Zadyhaylo,D.V. 2014. State macroeconomic regulation: the issue of systematization of legal support. Lawyer of Ukraine 2: 25-32.
[110] Zelisko,A.V. 2017. Entrepreneurial legal entities of private law as corporate entities. Legal Ukraine 1: 13 20.
[111] Zhidkoblinova, O., Stavbunik, Y., Spanova, B. 2016. Public-private partnership as a tool of public tourism sector administration. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 7(2): 253-258.
[112] Zhilinkova,I.V. 2012. Features of the exercise of subjective civil rights. Bulletin of the Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine 1: 100-107.
[2] Alekseev, S.S. 2008. General theory of law. TK Velbi, Prospect Publishing House.
[3] Association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. 2014.
[4] Benedeti, J.P.C., and Foliaco, A.C.L. 2016. The inherentrisk of the supplieras a preventative criterion in public procurement. Revista Derechodel Estado 37: 95-125.
[5] Berchenko, G.V. 2011. Constitutional principles of civil society in Ukraine. National Law University named after Yaroslav the Wise.
[6] Bodnar, T.V. 2007. Some problems of protection of civil rights in contractual obligations. University Research Notes 2: 113-118.
[7] Borisova, V.I. 2000. The problem of legal personality of a legal entity. Issues of Legality: Republican Interdepartmental Scientific Collection 43: 33-38.
[8] Boryslavska, O., et al. 2012. Decentralization of public power: the experience of European countries and perspectives of Ukraine. Individual entrepreneur Moskalenko O.M.
[9] Bran, F., Radulescu, C.V., Ioan, I. 2016. Issues to be addressed for enhancing the contribution of public participation in sustainable development strategies. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita 1: 25-34.
[10] Bratus`, S.M. 1947. Legal entities in Soviet civil law. Scientific works: Concept, types, state legal entities. Publishing House of the Ministry of Justice of the USSR.
[11] Byutsun, I.V. 2006. Association of legal entities in civil law: comparative and legal analysis. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[12] Cherupahin, B.B. 2001. Proceedings in civil law. Statut.
[13] Covert, J. 2016. Wild life justice commission: First public hearing: Investigating wild life trafficking in Viet Nam. Environmental Policy and Law 46(6): 368-370.
[14] Dmitriev, Yu.A. 2009. Civil society in Russia. Problems of formation and development. UNITY-DANA.
[15] Dobkina, K.R. 2014. Features of the legal status of production cooperatives as an entity. Young Scientist 11(14): 152-154.
[16] Domansky, J. 2016. Risk categories and risk management processes in nonprofit organizations. Foundations of Management 8: 227-242.
[17] Dovgert, A.S. 2014. Legislation of Ukraine on private international law: sources of borrowing. Private Law and Entrepreneurship 13: 13-17.
[18] Dudorova, K.B. 2015. Problems of compensation for moral damage caused to an individual as a result of violation of a civil contract. Bulletin of Lugansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko 2: 210-219.
[19] Dură, N.V. 2018. The relationships between the state and the church and their legal regime. Rules of international and national law. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 12(4): 192-201.
[20] Dzera, A.V. 2002. The concept of civil law and its place in the system of law of Ukraine. Bulletin of Khmelnitsky Institute of Regional Management and Law 2: 9-13.
[21] Egorov, A.V. 2006. Institutions as non-profit legal entities under the civil law of Russia. Volgograd State University.
[22] Evers, A., and Laville, J. 2004. Social services by social enterprise: on the possible contributions of hybrid organizations and a civil society. In: A. Evers and J. Laville (Eds.), The Third Sector in Europe, 237 255. Edward Elgar.
[23] Federal Law ‘On Public Associations’ dated May 19, 1995 N 82-FZ. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_6693/.
[24] Feldman, M.S. 1989.The oedipal complex: manifestations in the inner world and the therapeutic situation. In: R. Britton, M. Feldman& E. O’Shaugnessy (Eds.), The Oedipal Complex Today. Karnac Books.
[25] Filatova, N.Yu. 2014. Self-regulatory organizations as subjects of civil law. National Law University named after Yaroslav the Wise.
[26] Filatova, N.Yu. 2017. Regulation of features of electronic contracts: comparative legal analysis. Problems of Legality 139: 63-77.
[27] Fischer, M., Greenlee, J., Gordon, T., and Keating, E. 2007. An investigation of fraud in non-profit organizations: occurences and detterents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36: 676-694.
[28] Frolov, V.D. 2004. Legal capacity of a legal entity and its implementation under the civil law of Ukraine (civilistic aspect). National University ‘Odesʹ ka Yurydychna Akademiya’.
[29] Fuchegi, V.D. 2014. The legal characteristics of civil relations. South Ukrainian Law Journal 2: 71-73.
[30] Fukuyama, F. 2010. A strong state: governance and world order in the 21st century. AST.
[31] Galantich, M.K., and Cochin, V.V. 2013. Scientific and practical commentary of the law of Ukraine ‘On Public Associations’. Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship named after Academician F.G. Burchak NAPR of Ukraine.
[32] Gonyukova, L. 2005. Legal aspect of interaction of public-political associations and state power. Topical Problems of Public Administration 1(19): 73-82.
[33] Ilynykh, S.A., et al. 2018. The tools of social technologies in the management system: Private and public. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(4): 1267-1277.
[34] Johar, S.S., and Johar, G.S. 2017. A simple and cogent forensic technique to trap and nab a bribe-seeking corrupt public servant ‘blue-handed’. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 11(1): 43-54.
[35] Karmaza, O.O., et al. 2019 Civil law contract: Doctrinal and legal approaches. Asia Life Sciences 21(2): 821-836.
[36] Karnauk, T.P. 2014. Personal non-property rights of legal entities. PhD diss., Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
[37] Karthikeyan, K., and Ashok, J. 2018. Near optimal explicit guidance law with impact angle constraints for a hypersonicre-entry vehicle. INCAS Bulletin 10(2): 39-51.
[38] Khadzhyradieva, S., Hrechko, T., Savkov, A. 2019. Behavioral insights in public policy: Ukrainian case. Public Policy and Administration 18(1): 85-99.
[39] Kharitonov, Y.O. 2017. Ukraine - Europe: private law adaptation problems. Feniks.
[40] Kharitonova, O.I., and Kharitonov, E.O. 2006. Comparative law of Europe. Fundamentals of comparative law: European traditions. Odyssey.
[41] Kibenko, A.R. 2013. Organizational and legal forms of state enterprise and state joint-stock company: comparative legal analysis. Law and Innovation Society 1: 125-141.
[42] Kılıçaslan, H. 2018. Urban metaphors in the interaction of child with public space. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 10(3): 19-30.
[43] Kizdarbekova, A., Karibayeva, A. 2014. Legal mechanisms of competition protection in the CIS countries: Kazakhstan case study. Actual Problems of Economics 156(6): 92-99.
[44] Knobel, A. 2015. Eurasian Economic Union: prospects for development and possible obstacles. Economics 3: 87-108.
[45] Kokhanovskaya, O.V., and Kuznetsova, N.S. 2016. Modern private law of Ukraine: vectors of European development. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 3: 49-55.
[46] Kossak, V.M., and Yakubovsky, I.E. 2007. Intellectual property law. Istyna.
[47] Kostruba, A.V. 2018. Legal regulatory mechanism of social relations for ensuring dynamics in civil relationship. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(5), 1689-1695.
[48] Kryvenko, V.V. 2005. Religious organizations as subjects of private law of Ukraine. Actual Problems of the State and Law 25: 225-228.
[49] Kucherenko, I.M. 2007. Organizational and legal forms of legal entities of public law. University Research Notes 2: 134-146.
[50] Kuznetsova, N.S. 2005. The problem of compliance of civil law of Ukraine with the standards of European law. University Research Notes 1-2: 66-69.
[51] Law of the Republic of Belarus ‘On Public Associations’ dated October 04, 1994 No. 3254-XІІ. https://kodeksy-by.com/zakon_rb_ob_obwestvennyh_obedineniyah.htm.
[52] Law of the Republic of Tajikistan ‘On Public Associations’ dated May 12, 2007 No. 258. http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=17358.
[53] Law of Ukraine ‘On Citizens' Associations’ dated June 16, 1992 No. 2460-XII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2460-12.
[54] Law of Ukraine ‘On Public Associations’ dated March 22, 2012 No. 4572-VІ. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17/ed20120322.
[55] Ledyaev, V.G. 2007. Democracy. In: Great Russian Encyclopaedia. https://bigenc.ru/sociology/text/1947138.
[56] Lewis, D. 2008. ‘Non-governmentalism’ and the reorganisation of public action: management and the rise of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). In: S. Dar and B. Cooke (Eds.), The New Development Management: Critiquing the Dual Modernization, 41-55. Zed Books.
[57] Lipset, M. 2016. Political human: social policy foundations. Mysl.
[58] Luts, V.V. 2002. Theoretical problems of contract law in the context of the new civil code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Khmelnitsky Institute of Regional Governance and Law 2: 29-30.
[59] Maidanyk, R.A. 2002. Problems of trust relations in civil law. Kyiv University.
[60] Mambetov, F.K. 2015. The system of non-profit organsations of Russia. Law and Economics 6: 8-15.
[61] Mamutov, V.K.2013. About public property in a mixed economy. Economics and Law 1: 5-18.
[62] Menzhul, M.V. 2011. Public organizations as subjects of civil law. Institute of Security and Law named after V.M. Koretsky.
[63] Meyer,D.I. 2003. Russian civil law. Statut.
[64] Mises, F. 2012. Human activity: a treatise on economic theory. Socium.
[65] Nikonova, O.V. 2018. The development of the social protection system in the context of improving the legal and economic status of public organizations in the Russian Federation. Astra Salvensis 6(12): 679-687.
[66] Nogaibayev, Y., Shedenova, N., Satybaldiyeva, G. 2019. Governance and internalisation in social policy: Definition, concepts and causes. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22(1): 1544-0044-22-1-298.
[67] Novolodskaya, G.I., et al. 2018. Public-private partnership as innovative form of attraction of financial resources in sphere of tourism. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 9(4): 714-720.
[68] Odinaev, A.Sh. 2007. Legal aspects of building a civil society in the Republic of Tajikistan. Law and Act 12: 108-109.
[69] Parsons, T. 1979. An approach to the theory of organizations. Organizational Science 13(1): 249-273.
[70] Paruta, J.I. 2014. Theoretical and legal aspects of determining the organizational and legal form of public association. Private Law and Entrepreneurship 13: 74-76.
[71] Pashina, L.L., et al. 2018. Public-private partnership: Its essence and specificity. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(8): 2733-2739.
[72] Piddubna, V.F. 2014. Civil law status of a production cooperative. University Research Notes 4: 69-79.
[73] Plakhina, I.V. 2013. Liability for damages in the law of Germany, France, England and the USA. Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine 4: 1-7.
[74] Powell, W.W., and Di Maggio, P.J. (Eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
[75] Primak, V.D. 2013. Peculiarities of moral damages compensation as a measure of civil liability. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law 3: 175-179.
[76] Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
[77] Rosencranz, A., Vora, A. 2016. Public trust doctrine: A comparative analysis. Environmental Policy and Law 46(6): 378-380.
[78] Sanavvarov, G.B. 2014. The Formation and development of the administrative and legal status of public associations in the Republic of Tajikistan. Tajik State University of Business Law and Politics.
[79] Saniakhmetova, N.O. 2005. Concession contract as a form of investment. Actual Problems of the State and Law 25: 294-297.
[80] Semchik, V.I., and Podolyak, S. 2010. Restitution in Ukrainian and European contract law. Bulletin of the Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine 1: 206-214.
[81] Sergeeva, S.A. 2018. Sustainable socio-economic development of the country using the results of statistical analysis of the public procurement volume. Astra Salvensis 6: 147-157.
[82] Shashkova, A.V., Polovchenko, K.A., Volevodz, A.G. 2019. Questioning state corporations as special forms of legal entities. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 7: 186-203.
[83] Shershenevich, G.F. 2003. The science of civil law in Russia. Statut.
[84] Shevchenko, Ya.M. 2009. The role and importance of civil law subjects in society. Legal Bulletin. Air and Space Law 2: 39-46.
[85] Shimon, S.I. 2010. The relation between the concepts of ‘object of civil rights’ and ‘object of civil legal relations’ (to scientific discussion). Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University 18(10): 217-225.
[86] Shishko, R.B. 2013. Determination of the subject of comparative civil law in modern conditions. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of State Tax Service of Ukraine 2: 228-232.
[87] Soifer, T.V. 2018. Non-profit organizations: problems of civil legal personality. Journal of Russian Law 1: 30-39.
[88] Spasibo-Fateyeva, I.V. 2019. On the property liability of legal entities for the obligations of the state. Law of Ukraine 1: 204-216.
[89] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. 2019. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
[90] Stefanchuk, R.O. 2013. Modern problems of private law (to the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the civil code of Ukraine). Private Law 1: 94-105.
[91] Sukhanov, E.O. 2001.Owner ship in modern Russia. ROSSPNZ.
[92] Surov, A.F. 2016. The role of the self-regulation system in the implementation of public law functions. The Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice19: 79-84.
[93] Tatsiy, V., Serohina, S. 2018. Bicameralism: European tendencies and perspectives for Ukraine. Baltic Journal of European Studies 8(1): 101-122.
[94] The Civil Code of the Republic of Belarus. 1998. http://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=hk9800218.
[95] The Civil Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. 1999. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/ru/tj/tj013ru.pdf.
[96] The Civil Code of the Republic of RussianFederation.1994. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/9027690.
[97] The Civil Code of the Republic of Ukraine. 2003. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.
[98] Tikhonova, M.A. 2013. The concept and place of the outsourcing agreement for intellectual property management in the civil law of Ukraine. Our Right 2: 157-160.
[99] Tocqueville, A.D. 2003. Democracy in America and two essays on America. Penguin Books.
[100] Trufanova, L.M. 2004. The modern concept of legal entity (legal aspects) state and law. PhD diss., V.M. Koretsky National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
[101] Ushchypivska, L.V. 2015. Civil law status of public associations. Institute of Security and Law named after V.M. Koretsky.
[102] van der Voet, J. 2014. Leading change in public organizations. A study about the role of leadership in the implementation of organizational change in a public sector context. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
[103] Velásquez, A.G. 2017. Public and previous consultation on administrative rule-making in the Colombian legal system. Revista Derechodel Estado 38: 97-125.
[104] Vinnik,O.M. 2011. Forms and models of public-private partnership. University Research Notes 1: 159 169.
[105] Vitka,Yu.V. 2006. The civil legal characteristics of the non-state pension fund assets management agreement. University Scientific Notes 3-4: 213-216.
[106] Yakimov, A.Yu. 2003. The status of the legal subject (theoretical issues). State and Law 4: 5-10.
[107] Yankovskaya, E.V. 2011. Constitutional and legal status of public associations in the Republic of Belarus. Belarusian State University.
[108] Yatchenko, E.O. 2007. The special status of a religious organization as a subject of civil legal relations and the owner of property. Ukrainian Religious Studies 44: 59-70.
[109] Zadyhaylo,D.V. 2014. State macroeconomic regulation: the issue of systematization of legal support. Lawyer of Ukraine 2: 25-32.
[110] Zelisko,A.V. 2017. Entrepreneurial legal entities of private law as corporate entities. Legal Ukraine 1: 13 20.
[111] Zhidkoblinova, O., Stavbunik, Y., Spanova, B. 2016. Public-private partnership as a tool of public tourism sector administration. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 7(2): 253-258.
[112] Zhilinkova,I.V. 2012. Features of the exercise of subjective civil rights. Bulletin of the Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine 1: 100-107.
Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
FEDORCHENKO, Nataliia V. et al.
Public Organization as a Subject of Civil Legal Relations According to Law of Ukraine and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Countries.
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. 1421-1433, sep. 2019.
ISSN 2068-696X.
Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4826>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2024.
Section
Articles
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.