Structuring Relations in Civil Law after the Termination of Relations between Subjects
Abstract
The relevance of structuring relations in the field of civil law is determined by the forms of interaction between the subjects that were the initiators of the termination of legal relations. In this regard, the issues of maintaining relations, which could be continued in the future, are regulated on the basis of other contractual relations. With that, the works of legal scholars do not always provide sufficient grounds to propose points of fixation of the termination of relations. In this regard, the establishment of the meaning of legal facts for the formation of high-quality relationships between legal subjects after the termination of interaction remains very relevant. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that for the first time the aspects of creating and consolidating forms that would ensure sustainable development and minimize conflicts after termination of contractual relations are considered in civil law. The authors of the paper analyze the current legislative provisions and determine the direction of its development in the context of globalization. The article explores the theoretical construct of these relations and provides an analysis of civil legislation as applied to industry standards of economic legislation. The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that the application of the developed provisions will facilitate the harmonization of national legislations in the formation of bloc legal systems.
References
[2] Belov, V.A. 2012. Civil Law. Vol. 2. The General Part. Persons, Benefits, Facts. Yurait Publishing House.
[3] Borisov, V.V., N.V. Vitruk, N.L. Granat, Yu.I. Grevtsov, V.B. Isakov, V.N. Kartashov, D.A. Kerimov, S.A. Komarov, V.M. Levchenko, O.E. Leist, A.V. Malko, M.N. Marchenko, N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mitskevich, V.V. Oksamytny, A.S. Pigolkin, V.D. Popkov, T.N. Radko, I.N. Senyakin, Yu.A. Tikhomirov, and A.F. Cherdantsev. 1998. General Theory of State and Law: Theory of Law. Zertsalo.
[4] Braginsky, M.I., and V.V. Vitryansky. 2003. Contract Law: General Provisions. Book 1. Statut.
[5] Braginsky, M.I., and V.V. Vitryansky. 2011. Contract Law. Book One: General Provisions. Statut.
[6] Bulatetskiy, Yu.E. 2004. Commercial Law. International Centre for Financial and Economic Development.
[7] Chegovadze, L.A. 2004. The Structure and State of Civil Relations. Statut.
[8] Civil Code of France (Napoleon Code) of 21.03.1804. 1804. https://lawbook.online/gosudarstva-zarubejnogo-pravo/grajdanskiy-kodeks-frantsii-1804-kodeks-73899.html
[9] Egorova, M.A. 2010. Unilateral Refusal to Perform a Civil Contract. Statut.
[10] Egorova, M.A. 2011. Termination of obligations due to termination of acts of law. Law and Economics 1: 29-35.
[11] Filippova, S.Yu. 2011. Private Law Means of Organizing and Achieving Legal Goals. Statut.
[12] Gongalo, Yu., A. Gryadov, K. Krief-Semitko, E. Kuznetsov, I. Medvedev, and V. Yarkov. 2008. Civil Code of France. Prospekt.
[13] Ioffe, O.S. 1975. Law of Obligations. Yuridicheskaya literatura.
[14] Ioffe, O.S. 2000. Selected Works on Civil Law. From the History of Civilistic Thought. Civil Relationship. Criticism of the Theory of ‘Commercial Law’. Statut.
[15] Karapetov, A.G. 2011. The Main Tendencies in the Legal Regulation of Termination of a Violated Contract in Foreign and Russian Civil Law. Russian School of Private Law.
[16] Kazantsev, M.F. 2005. Contractual Regulation. Civilistic Concept. Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
[17] Kazantsev, M.F. 2008. The Concept of Civil Law Contractual Regulation. Ural State Law Academy.
[18] Khalfina, R.O. 1954. The Meaning and Essence of the Contract in Soviet Socialist Civil Law. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
[19] Kolomenskaya, E.V. 2006. Functions of the Contract in Trade. M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
[20] Korelsky, V.M., and V.D. Perevalov (Eds.). 2002. Theory of State and Law. NORMA Publishing House.
[21] Koretsky, A.D. 2001. Theoretical and Legal Foundations of the Doctrine of the Contract. Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
[22] Krasavchikov, O.A. 2001. Civil Contract: Concept, Content and Functions. Anthology of the Ural Civilistics, 1925 – 1989. Statut.
[23] Krasavchikov, O.A. 2005. Legal Facts in Soviet Civil Law. Statut.
[24] Kukushkin, A.A., and M.V. Subbotin. 2009. Unilateral refusal to perform the contract as a basis for termination of the contract. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=docandbase=CJIandn=36553#06665891496241119
[25] Lunts, L.A., and I.B. Novitsky. 1950. General Doctrine of Obligation. Gosyurizdat.
[26] Marchenko, M.N. 2004. Private law contract in the mechanism of legal regulation. Bulletin of Moscow University 2: 3-16.
[27] Meyer, D.I. 1997. Russian Civil Law. Statut.
[28] Ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016 portant réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations. 2016. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000032004939andcategorieLien=id
[29] Pobedonostsev, K.P. 2003. Civil Law Course: Contracts and Obligations. Statut.
[30] Pokrovsky, I.A. 2013. The Main Problems of Civil Law. Statut.
[31] Puginsky, B.I. 2008. Theory and Practice of Contractual Regulation. IKD Zertsalo-M.
[32] Razu, M.L., and I.V. Tsvetkov. 2005. Contractual Labor: Organization, Technology, Management. FBK-Press Publishing House.
[33] Rogov, Yu.V. 2015. Contract as a Means of Ensuring the Stability of Civil Transactions. Statut.
[34] Shershenevich, G.F. 1995. Textbook of Russian Civil Law. According to the Publication of 1907. Iskra.
[35] Skripilev, E.A. 1984. Digest of Justinian. Selected Fragments in Translation and with Notes by I.S. Peretersky. Nauka.
[36] Somenkov, S.A. 2002. Termination of the Contract in Civil Transactions: Theory and Practice. M3 Press.
[37] Vienna convention on contracts for the international sale of goods of April 11, 1980. 1980. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_003
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.