Development of the Institution of Arbitration in Kazakhstan: Problems of Theory and Practice

  • Ardak SHAIMENOVA Faculty of Law, Karaganda State University of the name of academician E.A. Buketov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
  • Gulzhazira ILYASSOVA Faculty of Law, Karaganda State University of the name of academician E.A. Buketov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
  • Yevgeniya KLYUYEVA Faculty of Law, State University of Infrastructure and Technologies, Kiev, Ukraine
  • Ainura KHASHIMOVA Faculty of Law, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

Abstract

The article discusses current issues of the application of the legislation of Kazakhstan on arbitration, provides statistical data on the results of consideration of cases on the cancellation of arbitral awards, on the enforcement of arbitral awards and identifies some problems of theory and practice in this area.


The aim of the study is a comprehensive analysis of judicial practice on the abolition of arbitral awards, as well as issues related to their enforcement, proposals have been developed on the formation of a uniform judicial practice and improvement of legislation. The work uses general scientific and special research methods: analysis, synthesis, abstraction, induction, deduction, logical and comparative legal method. As a result of the study, the author came to the conclusion that, in general, the norms of the Law of Kazakhstan ‘On Arbitration’, the Civil Procedure Code of Kazakhstan on the procedures for canceling arbitration decisions, recognition and enforcement of decisions of foreign arbitrations are consistent with international treaties.

References

[1] Nazarbayev N.A. 2012. Social modernization of Kazakhstan: twenty steps to the society of universal labor. Astana. https://www.zakon.kz.
[2] Sabikenov, S.N. 2015. A modern analysis of modern and classic international law. Bulletin of KazNPU named after Abay. International life and politics, 1 (43): 11-14.
[3] Greshnikov, P. 2015. Arbitration court: legislation, theory and experience. Almaty: Legal. 116.
[4] Skvortsov, O.Yu. 2017. Arbitration of business disputes in Russia: problems, trends, prospects. M.: Walters Clover. 240.
[5] Bruntseva, E.V. 2018. International commercial arbitration. SPb. 225.
[6] Neshataeva, T.N. 2001. Arbitration and state courts. Bulletin of Perm University, 2 (10): 77-91.
[7] Popov, M.A. 2018. Theoretical and practical problems of the Russian model of regulation of arbitration courts. Moscow. 39.
[8] Minakov, A.I. 2016. Arbitration agreement and practice of consideration of foreign economic disputes. Moscow: Yurid. 57.
[9] Suleimenov, M.K., Duysenova, A.E. 2018. Interaction of courts and arbitration in the field of alternative dispute resolution. International civil process. Training course. Astana. 173.
[10] Law of Kazakhstan. 2016. On Arbitration. https://www.zakon.kz.
[11] Civil Procedure Code of Kazakhstan. 2015. http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1500000377.
[12] Review of the arbitration practice of Kazakhstan International Arbitration. 2014. https://www.zakon.kz.
[13] Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan. 2019. https://www.zakon.kz.
[14] Actual directions of development of international arbitration. 2015. Center for Arbitration and Third Arbitration of the National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of Kazakhstan. Astana. 59.
[15] United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. 1958. New York. http://base.garant.ru/10164637/.
[16] European Convention on Foreign Trade Arbitration. 1961. Geneva. http://base.garant.ru/10164136/.
[17] Washington Convention. 1965. On the procedure for resolving investment disputes between states and foreign individuals. https://online.zakon.kz/ Document /? doc_id = 30219652 # pos = 1; 45.
[18] Federal Constitutional Law. 1995. On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation. http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx? Rgn = 1730.
[19] Department of analytics of the Karaganda regional court. 2016. Generalization of judicial practice in cases of recognition and enforcement, on the abolition of arbitral awards for 2016, 2017 and the 1st quarter of 2018. http://krg.sud.kz/rus.
[20] Belyanevich, E.A. 2017. On violation of public order as the basis for the nullity of the transaction. Civil law. Comments Practice: Favorites. Almaty, 5 (16): 277-294.
[21] Constitutional Law of Kazakhstan. 2000. On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges of Kazakhstan. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/? Doc_id = 1021164.
[22] Lowenfeld, A.F. 1993. International Litigation and Arbitration. St. Paul. 339.
[23] Morozov, M.E., Shilov, M.G. 2018. Commentary on the Federal Law ‘On Arbitration Courts of the Russian Federation’. Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Novosibirsk. 204-205.
[24] Mann, F.A. 2016. Private Arbitration and Public Policy. Civil Justice. 257.
Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
SHAIMENOVA, Ardak et al. Development of the Institution of Arbitration in Kazakhstan: Problems of Theory and Practice. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 169 – 186, mar. 2020. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4769>. Date accessed: 05 dec. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.1(47).21.