An Obligation of Corporate Criminal Liability in the Case of Non-Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS)
Abstract
Cases of industrial accidents occur as a result of corporations ignoring or not caring about the terms and conditions of occupational health and safety (OHS) according to Law Number 1 of 1970 concerning Occupational Safety (UUKK). The purpose of this research is to analyze the responsibility of corporate criminal liability if the OHS protection of workers/laborers is not implemented in the workplace. The research method used is legal research (normative juridical) with a statutory approach. The results of this study conclude that corporations must be liable for criminal liability for OHS workers' protection on the grounds that due to the bitter history of the conditions of Indonesian labor protection since the colonial era, protection is a concretization of Pancasila values, neglect of OHS protection is a violation of workers human rights at work, neglect of workers protection as an abuse of economic power and as a form of corporate crime. For the future, expectations this research contributed to knowledge and stakeholders aware of the importance of corporations burdened with criminal liability in the event that the protection of workers. Of personal skills, expected characteristics include the ability to protected workers and the ability to perform the renewal of the formulation of corporate criminal liability policies in accordance with the development of corporate punishment and living values in society.
References
[2] Amirulloh, et al. 2019. The Implementation of Legal Certainty Principle In Trademark Law With Regards To The Right Of Famous People To Sue Cybersquatter In Indonesia. Journal Of Advanced Research In Law And Economics, 10, No. 1.
[3] Ali, Mahrus. 2008. Kejahatan Korporasi, Kajian Relevansi Sanksi Tindakan Bagi Penanggulanagan Kejahatan Korporasi. Arti Bumi Intaran.
[4] Arief, Barda Nawawi. 1992. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Alumni.
[5] Arlen, J. 2015. Corporate criminal liability: theory and evidence. Research Handbook on the Economics of Criminal Law.
[6] Asikin, Zainal. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
[7] Box, S. 2003. Power, Crime, and Mystification. Tavistock Publication.
[8] Christiani, T.A. 2016. Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219. https://https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816300660
[9] Criminal Liability, A person is liable, or responsible, for a crime when he or she has acted with criminal intent, https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-liability.html
[10] Corporate Liability in Indonesia, ‘Corporate liability deriving from criminal activity, https://globalcompliancenews.com/white-collar-crime/corporate-liability-indonesia
[11] Gheorghe, C. 2017. Study regarding the Steps of Occupational Health in Safety Management System . International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 5,
[12] Hanafi. 1997. Reformasi Sistem Pertanggunjawaban Pidana, Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability dalam Hukum Pidana. Universitas Indonesia.
[13] Hassan, Kamal Halili. 2015. Corporate Liability Under Malaysian Occupational Safety And Health Legislation. International Journal of Business and Society, 16, No. 2, .http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/repository/pdf/Vol16-no2-paper8.pdf.
[14] Hatrik. 1996. Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.Rajawali Pers.
[15] Hatrik, H. 1996. Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability). Rajawali Pers.
[16] Herring, J. 2016. The basis of criminal liability. Law Trove.
[17] Ketenagakerjaan, Lima Permasalahan Ketenagakerjaan Di Tahun 2018, https://politik.rmol.id/read/2018/01/04/320850/.
[18] Kecelakaan Kerja, Data Kasus Kecelakaan Kerja di Indonesia. https://sadkes.net/2018/12/30/data-kasus-kecelakaan-kerja-di-indonesia.
[19] Hanafi. 1997. ReformasiSistemPertanggunjawabanPidana, Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability dalamHukumPidana. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. 1997.
[20] Ibrahim, J. 2005. Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.
[21] International Labor Organization. 2013. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kereja: Sarana untuk Produktifitas. ILO.
[22] Jeumpa, I.K. 2010. Perumusan Ketentuan Pidana dalam Undang-Undang 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (The Insertion od Criminal Rules into the Act Number, 32, 2009 regarding the Protection and Management of the Environment. Kanun.
[23] Jimenez, G.A. 2019. Corporate Criminal Liability: Toward a Compliance-Oriented Approach. Indiana University Press.
[24] Schofield, K.E. et al. 2015. Management Commitment to Safety and Risk of Workplace Injury: A Workers’ Compensation Insurance Perspective. Journal of Safety, Health and Environmental Research, 11, No.1, https://www.assp.org/docs/default-source/jsher/jsher_v11_n11.pdf?sfvrsn=8.
[25] Kumar, S. 2019. Corporate Criminal Liability - White Collar Crime’. Indiana.
[26] KNKG, Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. 2006. Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG), Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia.Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. KNKG.
[27] Lilly. 2015. Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences, (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
[28] Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto, Sri. 2007. Penelitian Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[29] Marzuki, P.M. 2010. Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Group.
[30] Metin, B., Ünğan, M.C., Ardıç, K. 2016. The relationships between OHS prevention costs, safety performance, employee satisfaction and accident costs. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 23, No.2,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10803548.2016.1226607?src=recsysandjournalCode=tose20
[31] Moeljatno. 1983. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertangungjawaban dalam Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara.
[32] Muhwezi, Matsiko Godwin. 2016. The Case For Corporate Criminal Liability .’Journal of Corporate Criminal, 2, No.1, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309041784_the_case_for_corporate_criminal_liability/link/57ff63d608ae6b2da3cbaf9b/download
[33] Muladi. 2003. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam BUMN Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. The Habibei Center.
[34] Nzau, Mumo. 2010. Africa’s Industrialization Debate: A Critical Analysis. The Journal of Language, Technology and Entrepreneurship in Africa, 2. www.ajol.info.
[35] OECD. 2015. Liability of Legal Persons for Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. OECD Anti-Corruption Network for Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
[36] Paulson, Kasoulides, S. 2014. Occupational Health and Safety, Corporate Liability and the Regulation of Officers. Faculty of Law Victoria University Wellington.
[37] Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: Per-028/A/JA/10/2014 tentang Pedoman Penanganan Perkara Pidana dengan Subjek Hukum Korporasi, dikeluarkan pada tanggal 1 Oktober 2014.’
[38] Ray, Kiely. 2007. Development theory and industrialisation: Beyond the impasse. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 24, 2, https://pdfslide.net/documents/development-theory-and-industrialisation-beyond-the-impasse.html
[39] Reksodiputro, Mardjono. 1994. Kemajuan Ekonomi dan Kejahatan.Universitas Indonesia.
[40] Saleh, Muhammad Roeslan. 1980. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar Dalam Hukum Pidana. Aksara Baru.
[41] Saleh, Muhammad Roeslan. 1982. Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggungan Jawab Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.
[42] Satjipto Rahardjo. Citra Aditya Bakti. 1991.
[43] Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2007. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. PT. Grafiti Pers.
[44] Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2017. Ajaran Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korporasi and Seluk Beluknya. Kencana.
[45] Maradona. 2018. Corporate Criminal Liability in Indonesia: Regulation, Implementation and Comparison with The Netherlands’. PhD diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam, 104-160, 228.
[46] Fox, Hazal. incorporating the Quarterly of the Society of Comparative Legislation and International Law and the Transactions of the Grotius Society. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 39, 2, (30 Dsecember 1990. DOI:10.1017/S0020589300051514
[47] Sulistyani, Muladi, Diah. 2016. Kompleksitas Perkembangan Tindak Pidana dan Kebijakan Kriminal. PT. Alumni.
[48] Sunggono, Bambang. 1997. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rajagrafindo Persada.
[49] Suparman, Marzuki. 2018. Dimensi Kejahatan Korporasi dan Reaksi Sosial. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
[50] Susanto, I.S. 2003. Kejahatan Korporasi. Badan Penerbit Undip.
[51] The Supreme Court Regulations No. 13 Year 2016.
[52] Undang-Undang Keselamatan Kerja jis. Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3, Pasal 4 huruf c dan d, Pasal 86 jo. Penjelasan umum.
[53] Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
[54] Undang-Undang Nomor 4 tahun 2004 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 8, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4358) menggantikan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 tahun 1970 tentang Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok.
[55] Wagner, R. 2020. Corporate Digital Responsibility. Journal of Corporation Law, 2, No.1, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006.
[56] Yunara, E. 2013. Pertanggungjaaban Pidana Korporasi Terbatas (PT) di Indonesia, PhD diss, Universitas Sumatera Utara.
[57] Zerk, J. 2015. Corporate liability for gross human rights abuses. A report prepared for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.