Artificial Intelligence as a New Category of Civil Law
Abstract
This research gives consideration to the legal status of artificial intelligence technology. Artificial intelligence as a future technology is actively expanding its capabilities at the present stage of development of society. In this regard, the concept of ‘artificial intelligence’ and the application of the rule of right in resolving issues of legal responsibility for the operation of artificial intelligence technologies require definition. The main purpose of this study is to define the concept of ‘artificial intelligence’ and determine whether artificial intelligence technologies are the object or subject of right. The article provides the analysis of possible approaches to the disclosure of the concept of ‘artificial intelligence’ as a legal category and its relationship with the concepts of ‘robot’ and ‘cyberphysical system’. The issues of legal responsibility for the operation of artificial intelligence are revealed. For the purposes hereof, the methods of collecting and studying the singularities; generalizations; the methods of scientific abstraction; the methods of cognition of consistent patterns, as well as the method of objectivity, concreteness, pluralism and a whole range of other methods were used. The study has concluded that the artificial intelligence technology is an autonomous self-organizing computer-software or cyberphysical system with the ability and capability to think, learn, make decisions independently, perceive and model surrounding images and symbols, relationships, processes and implement its own decisions. The following general properties of artificial intelligence technologies have been defined: autonomy; the ability to perceive the conditions (situation), make and implement own decisions; the ability to adapt own behavior, to learn, to communicate with other artificial intelligence, to consider, accumulate and reproduce experience (including human experience). Within the present historical period, artificial intelligence technology should be considered as the object of right. The legal responsibility for the operation of artificial intelligence lies with the operator or another person who sets the parameters of its operation and controls its behavior. The creator (manufacturer) of artificial intelligence is also recognized as a responsible person. This conclusion makes it possible to enter the category of artificial intelligence in the legal field and determine the persons responsible for its poor-quality operation.
References
[2] Hayes, A.S. 2016. Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics 34(7): 1308-1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.005
[3] El Bahrawy, A., et al. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2969708
[4] Dwyer, G.P. 2015. The economics of Bitcoin and similar private digital currencies. Journal of Financial Stability 17: 81-91. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2434628.
[5] Guadamuz, A., Guadamuz, M., Christopher, T. 2015. Blockchains and Bitcoin: Regulatory Responses to Cryptocurrencies. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2704852.
[6] Herrera-Joancomartí, J. 2015. Research and Challenges on Bitcoin Anonymity. InData Privacy Management, Autonomous Spontaneous Security, and Security Assurance. DPM 2014, QASA 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17016-9_1.
[7] Eyal, I. 2017. Blockchain Technology: Transforming Libertarian Cryptocurrency Dreams to Finance and Banking Realities. Computer 50(9): 38-49. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2017.3571042
[8] Kirillova, E.A., Pavlyuk, A.V., Zulfugarzade, T., Mikhailova. I.A. 2018. Bitcoin, lifecoin, namecoin: the legal nature of virtual currency. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9(1): 119-126. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v9.1(31).16.
[9] Japanese Financial Markets: Junichi Ujiie Elsevier President and CEO Nomura Holdings, Inc.: Woodhead publishing limited Cambridge England. 2002.DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2019.59.7.154-16
[10] Peck, M.E. 2017. Blockchains: How they work and why they'll change the world. IEEE Spectrum 54(10): 26-35.
[11] Liu,Q., Li, K. 2018. Decentration Transaction Method Based on Blockchain Technology. Intelligent Transportation Big Data and Smart City (ICITBS) 2018 International Conference, 416 – 419. DOI: 10.1109/ICITBS.2018.00111.
[12] Treleaven, P., Brown, R.G., Yang, D. 2017. Blockchain Technology in Finance. Computer 50(9): 14-17. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2017.3571047.
[13] Wright, A., De Filippi, P. 2015. Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia. March 10, 2015. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2580664.
[14] Zheng,Z., Xie,S., Dai,H.N., Chen, X. 2018. Huaimin Wang Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services (IJWGS) 14(4): 352 – 375. DOI: 10.1504/IJWGS.2018.10016848.
[15] Law No. 54 ‘On Payment Services’. June 24, 2009. Retrieved from: https://www.e-gov.go.jp/sorry.html.
[16] Abramowicz, M.B. 2015. Cryptocurrency-Based Law. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper 2015-9. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2573788.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.