Technological Stratification of the Large Business Enterprises’ Development
Abstract
Large business enterprises currently form the basis of both businesses in general and social development. The paper notes that the target existence of a large business enterprise is the ability to accumulate funds and create innovative products. It is noted that on the whole such elements are consolidated and gradually implemented in the social and economic environment of the state. The work uses econometric methods that allow fully revealing the reasons for differentiation of large business enterprises and determining the index parameters of the demand for development for the subsequent infrastructural transformation. It is pointed out that the effect of such activity is achieved not only as the profit received, but also in the overall perception of the commodity market. The novelty of the research is the indicators that the largest technological and structural companies that implement the majority of innovations at the core level of their system were analyzed and indices that evaluate in a comprehensive manner all possible types of innovations and the level of their implementation are provided. The direction of further research is the calculation of the possible institutional transformation of large business objects into state entities or objects with such characteristics.
References
[2] Atanelishvili, T. and Silagadze, A. 2018. Formation of Economic Views in the Ancient Era. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 2(1): 191-196.
[3] Bell, S. 2008. International Brand Management of Chinese Companies: Case Studies on the Chinese Household Appliances and Consumer Electronics Industry Entering US and Western European Markets. Physica-Verlag HD.
[4] Beranová, M., Tabas, J. and Vavřina. J. 2016. Key aspects of competitiveness: Focus on European small and medium-sized enterprises. In P. Huber, D. Nerudová, and P. Rozmahel (Eds.). Competitiveness, Social Inclusion and Sustainability in a Diverse European Union: Perspectives from Old and New Member States. New York: Springer International Publishing, 121-143.
[5] Bergsteiner, H. and Avery, G.C. 2012. When ethics are compromised by ideology: The global competitiveness report. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4): 391-410. DOI:10.1007/s10551-011-1136-y
[6] Bondaletov, V.V. 2016. Political mechanisms to improve the manageability of the public sector. Materials of the Afanasiev Readings, 4(17): 7-13.
[7] Buley, N.V., Demchenko, T.S., Bondaletov, V.V., Bondaletova, N.F. and Makushkin, S.A. 2017. Management policy promotion as element of complex of commercial organizations marketing. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(12): 307-316.
[8] Carroll, T. 2014. The international finance corporation’s transformation of development in the Asia-Pacific: working on, through and around the state. In T. Carroll and D.S.L. Jarvis (Eds.), The Politics of Marketing Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 43-70.
[9] Cho, D.H. and Shim, H.S. 2011. A study on IT organization redesign with IT governance: focusing on k public corporation in Korea. In J.J. Park, L.T. Yang, and C. Lee (Eds.). Future Information Technology: 6th International Conference, Proceedings, Part I. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 426-436.
[10] Cortenraad, W.H.F.M. 2000. The quest for remedies: markets, monitoring and managerial liability. The Corporate Paradox: Economic Realities of the Corporate Form of Organization. New York: Springer, 179-212.
[11] Crouch, G.I., and Ritchie, J.R.B. 2012. Destination Competitiveness and Its Implications for Host-Community QOL. In M. Uysal, R. Perdue, and M.J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research: Enhancing the Lives of Tourists and Residents of Host Communities. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 491-513.
[12] Davis, S.T. 2016. From insularity to integration: the reformulation of socially responsible business in Japan. In S.O. Idowu (Ed.), Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Dimension of CSR in Corporate Entities. New York: Springer International Publishing, 279-302.
[13] Deavers, K.L. 1997. Outsourcing: A corporate competitiveness strategy, not a search for low wages. Journal of Labor Research 18(4): 503-519. DOI: 10.1007/s12122-997-1019-2
[14] Flohr, A., Rieth, L., Schwindenhammer, S. and Wolf, K.D. 2010. The Role of Business in Global Governance: Corporations as Norm-Entrepreneurs. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[15] Gurieva, L.K., Akhmetshin, E.M., Savicheva, A.N., Kataeva, V.I. and Norkina, A.N. 2016. Theoretical foundations of management of the organization: Development, types of structures, management methods of control. International Business Management, 10(10): 5406-5416.
[16] Hawdon, D. 1986. Market competitiveness. In P. Stevens (Ed.), International Gas: Prospects and Trends. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 14-33.
[17] He, Y., Dong, J. and Bai, R. 2011. The evaluation model of financial competitiveness in telecom enterprises. In Q. Zhou (Ed.), Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development: International Symposium, Proceedings, Part II. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 24-32.
[18] Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9): 834-864. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.26
[19] Konzelmann, S.J. and Birecree, A.M. 2000. Alternative work systems and the competitive process. The dynamics of wage relations in the new Europe. New York: Springer.
[20] Lawton, T.C. and Hodges, M.R. 1999. Promoting competitiveness: inward investment incentives and enterprise policy. In T.C. Lawton (Ed.), European Industrial Policy and Competitiveness: Concepts and Instruments. London: Macmillan Education UK, 204-225.
[21] Li, M. 2013. Basic Theories of Industrial Security Research on Industrial Security Theory. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[22] Millstein, I.M., and P.W. MacAvoy. 2003. The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[23] Noh, K.-S. 2016. A study on the position of CDO for improving competitiveness based big data in cluster computing environment. Cluster Computing, 19(3): 1659-1669. DOI:10.1007/s10586-016-0610-9
[24] Ogrean, C. and Herciu, M. 2015. A Dynamic Model for the Global Corporation: The Triad Networks ‒ Coevolution ‒ Competitiveness. In A.A. Camillo (Ed.), Global Enterprise Management: New Perspectives on Challenges and Future Developments. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 79-96.
[25] Pearce, R. 1997. Global Competition and Technology: Essays in the Creation and Application of Knowledge by Multinationals. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[26] Pilinkienė, V., Deltuvaitė, V., Daunorienė, A. and Gaidelys, V. 2017. Creation and Maintenance in the Postal Services Industry: A Lithuanian Case Study. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
[27] Ștefănescu, L., Ștefănescu, A., Ciora, I.L, Bogdănoiu, C. 2010. Economic feasibility of the reengineering projects. Journal of Advanced Research in Management, Volume I, Summer, 1(2):120-126.
[28] Shin, K.-Y. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[29] Walters, B., Hardin, T. and Schick, J. 1995. Top executive compensation: Equity or excess? Implications for regaining American competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3): 227-234. DOI:10.1007/bf00881437
[30] Zhao, X., Li, G.-H., Liu, J.-Y. and Xu,H. 2013. Study on the performance evaluation of the parent-subsidiary corporation’s financial management and control. In E. Qi, J. Shen, and R. Dou (Eds.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Engineering Economics Management. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 781-789.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.