Comparative Analysis of Russian and Foreign Experience in Managing Enterprises' Intellectual Property

  • Olga Nicolaevna BYKOVA Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russia
  • Andrey Petrovich GARNOV Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russia
  • Dmitry Evgenievich MORKOVKIN Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia
  • Pavel Victorovich STROEV Center of Regional Economy and Inter-Budgetary Relations Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russia
  • Lyudmila Gennadievna RUDENKO Faculty of Economics and Finance, Moscow Witte University, Russia
  • Alevtina V. ZONOVA Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit Vyatka State University, Russia
  • Rimma V. LIVANOVА Russian State Agrarian University named after K.A.Timiryazev, Russia
  • Natalia Ivanovna ISAICHYKOVA Gomel State Technical University named after P.O. Sukhoi, Belarus

Abstract

The objective of the research is to study Russian and foreign experience in managing intellectual property in the authorized capital, as well as to develop ways to improve the approaches to the capitalization of an enterprise’s intellectual property.


Methods: The role and quantity of the results of intellectual activity as a company's competitive advantage are increasing in the modern world. Intellectual capital is the main resource for a company. In Russian practice, there is a lack of awareness about the proper maintenance of accounting and effective management of intellectual property. Therefore, the authors, first, conducted a comparative analysis of Russian and foreign practices and identified the ways and areas for improvement. Second, the authors considered the specifics of creating an intellectual property management system at an enterprise. Third, they developed the methods for adapting foreign experience to the Russian economy. Fourth, the prospects for accounting the intellectual property items in the authorized capital of enterprises were considered.


Recommendations were made for accounting and tax accounting. In cases when intangible assets are included in the turnover, an acceptable cost should be guaranteed, and the maximum value should be set for the commercialization of intellectual property. Second, special attention should be paid to the development of recommendations aimed at improving the results of the use of intellectual property and intellectual rights, which will lead to an increase in productivity and speed of work. The study results will allow improving the financial condition of a company through the capitalization of an organization’s intellectual property from the perspective of foreign experience. The proposed methods will help organizations to improve their financial condition through the capitalization of their intellectual property items.

References

[1] Akmaeva, R.I. 2012. Innovative management of a small enterprise operating in the scientific and technical area. Study guide. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix.
[2] Barkhatov, A.P. 2002. Intangible assets: accounting and audit. Moscow: Publishing House Dashkov and K., 155.
[3] Brooking, E. 2001. Intellectual capital. St. Petersburg: Peter, 288.
[4] Bulyga, R.P. 2008. Audit of intangible assets of a commercial organization. Legal, accounting and methodological aspects. Moscow: UNITY-DANA, 343.
[5] Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. 1997. Working Knowledge: Haw Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 224.
[6] Edwinsson, L. 2005. Corporate Longitude. Navigation in a knowledge-based economy. Moscow: INFRA-M, 247.
[7] Hrivnak, M., Melichova, K., Fazikova, M. and Rohacikova, O. 2019. University graduates, knowledge spill-overs and localization of knowledge intensive ventures - case of post-socialistic country. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1): 146-165. DOI: http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(12)
[8] Leontiev, B.B. 2009. Approaches to the assessment of intellectual property. Evaluation activity, 3: 58-62.
[9] Lukin, B.V., Belousova, N.M. and Panova, N.A. 2014. Intellectual Property Management: The study guide. Moscow: MSUPA named after Ivan Fedorov.
[10] MacDonald, B. 2013. Intellectual Property Proceedings in US Federal and Administrative Courts with Regarding the Innovations of Patent Law. Intellectual Property Court Journal 1: 2-4.
[11] Mukhopad, V.I. 2010. Commercialization of Intellectual Property. Moscow: Publishing House Master: INFRA-M, 512.
[12] Novoseltsev, O.V. 2008. Intellectual property in the civil law system: problems of legal understanding. Intellectual property. Actual problems of theory and practice: collection of scientific works. Moscow: Yurayt.
[13] Raudeliūnienė, J., Davidavičienė, V. and Jakubavičius, A. 2018. Knowledge management process model. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(3): 542-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(10)
[14] Sagiyeva, R., Zhuparova, A., Ruzanov, R., Doszhan, R. and Askerov, A. 2018. Intellectual input of development by knowledge-based economy: problems of measuring in countries with developing markets. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6(2): 711-728. DOI: http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(17)
[15] Semerikov, V.N. 2014. The specifics of using intellectual property rights as a contribution to the authorized capital of a joint venture. In E.V. Koroleva (Ed.), The materials of the sectional meeting of the Third All-Russian Forum "Intellectual Property - the XXI Century" April 20-23, 2014. Moscow: The Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property.
[16] Stuart, T. 2007. Intellectual capital: A new source of wealth for organizations. Moscow: Generation, 366.
[17] Taylor, F.W. 1991. Principles of Scientific Management. Moscow: Journal Controlling, 104.
[18] Zarutskaya, N.V. 2018. Accounting for the contributions of the founders in the authorized capital. Materials of the sectional meeting of the seventh all-Russian forum “Intellectual Property - XXI Century” April 22–26, 2018. Moscow: Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property.

*** Civil Code of the Russian Federation. 2006. Part Four dated Dec. 18, 2006 No. 230-FZ: adopted by the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Nov. 24, 2006: approved by the Council of Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Dec.8, 2006: enacted by Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated December 18, 2006 No. 231-FZ. Retrieved March 3, 2019 from: https://rg.ru/2006/12/22/grazhdansky-kodeks.html
*** Decree of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation N 153n. December 27, 2007 "On approval of the Accounting Regulations", "Accounting for intangible assets" (AR 14/2007)". Available at: https://rg.ru/2008/02/02/buhuchet.html
*** Decree of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation of November 19, 2002 N 114n "On approval of the Accounting Regulations", "Accounting of calculations for income tax of organizations" (AR 18/2002)". Available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102096615&intelsearch=114%ED.
*** Federal Law No. 209-FZ. July 24, 2007. “On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation”. Legal reference system “Consultant Plus”. Retrieved March 27, 2019 from https://rg.ru/2007/07/31/biznes-doc.html
*** Russian Venture Company. 2015. The concept of institutional environment formation in the field of intellectual property. Date of access: 29.03.2018. Retrieved from https://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/56a/201512_concept_ of_institutional_environment.pdf
Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
BYKOVA, Olga Nicolaevna et al. Comparative Analysis of Russian and Foreign Experience in Managing Enterprises' Intellectual Property. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 1046-1054, june 2019. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/4715>. Date accessed: 22 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.4(42).06.