Balance of Interests as a Principle of Civil Law: Some Aspects of Legal Consciousness
Abstract
The research considers the category of reasonable balance of interests in the context of civil relations. The authors of the article highlight the need to restrict permissibility as a method of civil regulation aimed at protecting the rights and interests of the weaker party in some legal relations. A reasonable balance of interests is ensured by laws and agreements, whose conditions become the subject of a judicial dispute in the absence of a mandatory rule. The authors have analyzed judicial acts conditioned by the need to maintain a reasonable balance of interests. As a result, they have determined that the first condition for applying the fair balance principle is the equivalence of counter-performance in the absence of both excessive benefits and excessive losses for the parties. The second condition is the party-related division in some civil relations. The authors have concluded that the risks of negative consequences should not be borne only by the weaker party if the latter could not reasonably foresee the consequences upon concluding the relevant agreement. Methods. The study is based on the comparative analysis of the Russian scientific doctrine and judicial practice. The main approach to the analysis of the legal tools in question is the method of system analysis. In addition, the authors used the structural-functional method and general scientific methods of cognition. The study aims at determining the principle of a reasonable balance of interests in civil law, its essence, necessity and expediency in the system of law enforcement. The authors aim to define conditions for applying legal norms to achieve a reasonable balance of interests among all parties in disputed legal relations. Results. The study results let the authors claim that the risks of negative consequences should not be borne only by the weaker party if it could not reasonably foresee such consequences upon concluding the agreement and the imbalance of interests among parties in civil-legal relations is caused by the violation by one or another party of the principles of fair practice and reasonableness. Although a reasonable balance of interests is a counterweight to the principles of contractual freedom and free will, courts should apply it to ensure the right of justice.
References
[2] Ershov, V.V. 2013. Pravovoe i individualnoe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii kak parnye kategorii [Legal and individual regulation of social relations as dual categories]. Rossiiskii sudya 2: 15-17.
[3] Kirpichev, A.E. 2015. Bezvozmezdnost grazhdansko-pravovogo dogovora [The gratuitousness of a civil law contract]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie 10: 22-29.
[4] Kulakov, V.V. 2016. Razumnyi balans interesov kak tsel grazhdanskogo-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Reasonable balance of interests as an objective of civil regulation]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie S1: 174-185.
[5] Pokrovskii, I.A. 2001. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Main challenges of civil law]. Moscow: Statut.
[6] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 02.06.2015 № 21 ‘O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii zakonodatelstva, reguliruyushchego trud rukovoditelei organizatsii i chlenov kollegialnogo ispolnitelnogo organa organizatsii’ [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 21 dated June 2, 2015 ‘On some issues experienced by courts applying the legislation regulating the work of chief executive officers and board of directors’]. https://legalacts.ru/doc/postanovlenie-plenuma-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-02062015/.
[7] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 26 dekabrya 2017 goda No. 58 ‘O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva ob obyazatel'nom strahovanii grazhdanskoj otvetstvennosti vladel'cev transportnyh sredstv’ [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 58 dated December 26, 2017 ‘On the application by the courts of legislation on compulsory third party liability insurance of vehicle owners’]. https://legalacts.ru/sud/postanovlenie-plenuma-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-26122017-n-58/.
[8] Zorkin, V.D. 2008. Rossiya i Konstitutsiya v XXI veke [Russia and its Constitution in the 21st century]. Moscow: Norma, 56 pp.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.